Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hepatic cases Kathleen Tennant BVetMed Cert SAM Cert VC FRCPath MRCVS

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hepatic cases Kathleen Tennant BVetMed Cert SAM Cert VC FRCPath MRCVS"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hepatic cases Kathleen Tennant BVetMed Cert SAM Cert VC FRCPath MRCVS
Clincial Lead Diagnostic Laboratories Langford Veterinary Services

2

3 Case 1 2 year old Norfolk terrier
Presented depressed, vomiting and lethargic after scavenging in dustbin including baby nappies, chocolate cake and sugar free gum Clinical exam – slightly icteric

4 Haematology Haemoconcentrated (PCV 59 L/L)
Platelet count through the machine 100 (200 – 500 x 10^9/L) Leucocytes unremarkable (numbers and morphology)

5 Test Result Range Units Total protein 65 g/L Albumin 30 Globulins 35 Sodium 155 mmol/L Potassium 4.0 4.1 – 5.3 Chloride 107 Calcium 2.3 2.13 – 2.7 Inorganic phosphorous 3.2 Urea 9.3 3 – 9.1 Creatinine 162 Umol/L Cholesterol 9.0 3.3 – 8.9 Total bilirubin 16 0 – 2.4 AST 402 0 - 28 U/L ALT 4 ALP 2900

6 How do we best interpret the ALT value?
Rules out hepatocellular damage 1. Low due to lack of remaining hepatic parenchyma Likely to be laboratory or technical error 3. There was hepatocellular damage, but this is in the past, hence low ALT but AST still elevated

7 Test Result Range Units Total protein 65 g/L Albumin 30 Globulins 35 Sodium 155 mmol/L Potassium 4.0 4.1 – 5.3 Chloride 107 Calcium 2.3 2.13 – 2.7 Inorganic phosphorous 3.2 Urea 9.3 3 – 9.1 Creatinine 162 Umol/L Cholesterol 9.0 3.3 – 8.9 Total bilirubin 8.2 0 – 2.4 AST 402 0 - 28 U/L ALT 4 ALP 2900

8 Internal consistency AST and ALT often both elevate with hepatocellular damage, with 2 x top of reference interval elevations mild, 4 x moderate and 10 x taken as marked It would be unusual for ALT to be below reference if AST is this elevated in hepatocellular damage as AST generally elevates with more, not less, damage. The half life of AST is actually shorter than that of ALT (< 1 day vs 2 -3 days), so severity and timing play a role in the final values Low ALT due to absence of remaining hepatocytes extremely unusual, and not expected if AST still high AST elevation without ALT may be due to muscle damage No history or suspicion of muscle damage – could use creatine kinase to confirm its presence or absence ? Falsely low ALT

9 Trouble - shooting single dubious results
Check the gross appearance of the sample or machine flags for hemolysis, icterus or lipaemia if these interfere with the assay This sample is icteric – does not affect ALT but: Inorganic phosphorous 3.2 (ref mmol/L) – is affected by icterus – reject result

10 Trouble - shooting single dubious results (ALT)
Check the quality assurance/ quality control for that analyte Usually by checking the machine’s log for low, medium and high control performance Should indicate if there is a problem with reagents, and can be run again if needed to check for a machine glitch (e.g. bubble in the system) Check the results of samples either side of this one In this case – all fine, so re – run to rule out a ‘pipetting’ error Also run in x 10 and x 100 dilution

11 ALT re-run results Neat sample – ALT 0 (13 – 88 U/L)
X 10 dilution - ALT 3502 (13 – 88 U/L) X 100 dilution – ALT 3560 (13 – 88 U/L) Some wet chemistry dynamic assays, confronted with extremely high activity in their target enzyme will ‘miss’ the activity because it’s all over too quickly to measure – default to 0 or a very low level

12 Falsely low readings with high value rate of change assays
Substrate depletion Substrate depletion Absorbence Absorbence delay delay measure measure

13 Test Result Range Units Total protein 65 g/L Albumin 30 Globulins 35 Sodium 155 mmol/L Potassium 4.0 4.1 – 5.3 Chloride 107 Calcium 2.3 2.13 – 2.7 Inorganic phosphorous N/A Urea 9.3 3 – 9.1 Creatinine 162 Umol/L Cholesterol 9.0 3.3 – 8.9 Total bilirubin 16 0 – 2.4 AST 402 0 - 28 U/L ALT 3502 ALP 2900

14 What else SHOULD have been measured at the beginning, given the clinical history?
Presented depressed, vomiting and lethargic after scavenging in dustbin including baby nappies, chocolate cake and sugar free gum Clinical exam – slightly icteric

15 What else SHOULD have been measured at the beginning, given the clinical history?
Bile acids Glucose PT/APTT D – dimers Ammonia

16 Xylitol toxicity Marked elevation in insulin following ingestion
Initial marked hypoglycaemia may lead to some of the central clinical signs Hepatocellular necrosis, development of D.I.C./ bleeding disorders Marked prolongations in PT and APTT and evidence of bleeding disorder, including petechiation, G.I. bleeding. D – dimers likely to elevate. Although they are likely to be abnormal, bile acids and ammonia should not take precedence over glucose and assessing clotting ability.

17 Case 2 8 y.o. FN Irish Wolfhound
3 week history of vague lethargy, inappetance and intermittent diarrhoea Owners noted a bloated abdomen that morning, followed by collapse – rushed in

18 Clinical findings Poor body condition (3/9)
Fluid thrill in abdomen – structures could not be palpated Tachycardic, bounding pulses

19 Haematology – what describes the red cell picture?
Hb (12 – 18 g/dl) HCT 27 (35 – 55 %) RBC 5.0 (5.4 – 8.0 x 10^12/L) MCV 64 (65 – 75 fl) MCH 21 (22 – 25 pg) MCHC 32.8 (34 – 37 g/dl) This slide takes a while to look at.

20 What best describes the red cell picture?
Mild normochromic anaemia 1. Moderate normochromic normocytic anaemia Mild hypochromic normocytic anaemia 3. Mild hypochromic microcytic anaemia 4. Mild regenerative anaemia 5.

21 Haematology Hb 10.00 (12 – 18 g/dl) Mild anaemia HCT 27 (35 – 55 %)
RBC 5.0 (5.4 – 8.0 x 10^12/L) MCV 64 (65 – 75 fl) Microcytic MCH 21 (22 – 25 pg) MCHC 32.8 (34 – 37 g/dl) Hypochromic

22 Smear examination – red cell morphology

23 What best describes the red cell morphology on the smear?
Unremarkable Microcytic, hypochromic 2. Echinocytes Acanthocytes Schistocytes

24 Erythrocytes in liver dysfunction
Poor iron handling compromises erythroid precursor haemoglobin manufacture – less haemoglobin per cell Slowness in achieving a haemoglobin content threshold allows an extra precursor division, resulting in smaller cells These will generally be picked up by the machine BEFORE they are obvious on the smear No evidence of regeneration in this population – no obvious polychromatophils

25 Acanthocytes and schistocytes
Acanthocytes (black arrows) are red cells with large cytoplasmic projections. These are associated with liver diseases, lipid disorders and shear injury to the red cells Schistocytes (red arrow) associated with shear injury to red cells

26 Test Result Range Units Total protein 65 g/L Albumin 26 Globulins 20 Sodium 146 mmol/L Potassium 4.5 4.1 – 5.3 Chloride 107 Calcium 2.2 2.13 – 2.7 Inorganic phosphorous 1.2 Urea 7.8 3 – 9.1 Creatinine 158 Umol/L Cholesterol 7.2 3.3 – 8.9 Total bilirubin 3.3 0 – 2.4 AST 210 0 - 28 U/L ALT 880 ALP 810

27 Is this more a cholestatic or a hepatocellular damage picture?
Both exactly the same 3.

28 Test Result Range Units Total protein 65 g/L Albumin 26 Globulins 20 Sodium 146 mmol/L Potassium 4.5 4.1 – 5.3 Chloride 107 Calcium 2.2 2.13 – 2.7 Inorganic phosphorous 1.2 Urea 7.8 3 – 9.1 Creatinine 158 Umol/L Cholesterol 7.2 3.3 – 8.9 Total bilirubin 3.3 0 – 2.4 AST x ref 0 - 28 U/L ALT x ref ALP 810 3 x ref

29 Abdominal fluid – sampled through midline
PCV 18 % Plt 5 x 10^9/L Nucleated cell count 3 x 10^9/L Total protein 30 g/L

30 Abdominal effusion – elsewhere on the slide

31 What best describes the nature of the fluid?
Transudate Modified transudate 2. Exudate Iatrogenic haemorrhage superimposed on a transudate Haemorrhagic

32 Abdominal fluid – sampled through midline
PCV 18 % Plt 5 x 10^9/L Nucleated cell count 3 x 10^9/L Total protein 30 g/L Transudates TP < 25 g/L, nucleated cell count < 1 x 10^9/L Not expected here as serum albumin 26 g/L Previous and current haemorrhage….

33 Imaging - appearance of liver

34 Coagulation testing PT patient 9 secs , control 9 secs (expected < 11 s) APTT patient 25 secs, control 18 secs (expected < 21 s) D – dimers 0.5 (0 – 2 mg/dl)

35 Which of these fits best with the coagulation test results?
Coumarin toxicity Liver dysfunction Hemophilia A Hemophilia B Consumptive coagulopathy (prolongation due to factors being used up attempting to stop bleeding from another cause) 5.

36 Coagulopathies and liver disease
May be compromise in absorbing Vitamin K and other fat soluble vitamins Many clotting factors made by liver In some animals with liver disease, APTT may prolong ahead of PT Hemophiliacs often have very prolonged APTT values Can not rule out a consumptive coagulopathy, although often PT and APTT might be expected to prolong together Has anyone noticed we haven’t looked at platelets yet?

37 Platelet count through machine = 60 x 10^9/L, smear estimate 40 – 60 x 10^9/L Likely consumption….

38 Hepatic cytology 100x magnification

39 Hepatic cytology Normal Patient

40 Hepatic cytology 500x

41 What is the cytology most compatible with?
Chronic hepatitis Large cell lymphoma 2. Haemangiosarcoma 3. Hepatoma Hepatic carcinoma

42 Final diagnosis: Hepatic carcinoma - ruptured

43 Cytology correlation with histopathology
Wang et al (2004): 94 cases, dogs and cats – overall agreement between histopathology and cytology in 30% canine and 51% of feline samples. Best agreement in vacuolar hepatopathy (7/11 dogs, 15/18 cats), poor correlation for inflammation (5/20 dogs, 3/11 cats) Kristensen et al (1990): agreement in 66% between histo/ cyto in 44 cases

44 Case 3

45 Case 3 9 y.o. N.F. miniature Dachshund
Intermittent lethargy, abdominal pain, vomiting Recent rapid deterioration – collapse, pyrexia, dehydration, icterus

46 Haematology WBC 35 (5.5 – 17 x 10^9/L)
Neutrophils 32 (3.0 – 11.5 x 10^9/L) Other findings through machine unremarkable Smear shows left shift and toxic change in neutrophils

47 Neutrophils

48 Test Result Range Units Total protein 84 g/L Albumin 26 Globulins 58 Sodium 149 mmol/L Potassium 5.1 4.1 – 5.3 Chloride 111 Calcium 2.3 2.13 – 2.7 Urea 9.3 3 – 9.1 Creatinine 162 Umol/L Cholesterol 13.2 3.3 – 8.9 Total bilirubin 54 0 – 2.4 AST 45 0 - 28 U/L ALT 210 ALP 1283 GGT 56 0 - 15

49 Which of these is true? ALP is a more sensitive or equally sensitive marker compared to GGT for cholestasis in the dog ALP is a more sensitive marker than GGT for cholestasis in the cat 2. Bilirubin is a specific marker for cholestasis in the dog and cat 3. Cholesterol decreases in cholestatic disease

50 Markers for cholestasis
ALP is a sensitive marker for cholestasis in the dog, but in the cat, GGT tends to increase more in hepatic/cholestatic conditions other than hepatic lipidosis Due to potential elevations derived from increased haemolysis, bilirubin is not specific for cholestasis in the dog or cat Cholesterol increases in cholestasis (hence the name!)

51 Further testing Canine Pancreatic Lipase within normal limits
PT/ APTT normal

52 Extracellular bile pigment

53 Gall bladder contents

54 Gall bladder contents

55 Final diagnosis Pure growth of E coli cultured from gall bladder contents aspirate, and from biopsies of liver parenchyma Ascending cholecystitis/ infection

56


Download ppt "Hepatic cases Kathleen Tennant BVetMed Cert SAM Cert VC FRCPath MRCVS"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google