Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Heavy Ion Physics with the ATLAS Detector

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Heavy Ion Physics with the ATLAS Detector"— Presentation transcript:

1 Heavy Ion Physics with the ATLAS Detector
Pavel Nevski Brookhaven National Laboratory On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

2 From RHIC to LHC Super-hot QCD: Will we see a weakly coupled QGP??
sNN : 200 GeV ,500 GeV Super-hot QCD: Will we see a weakly coupled QGP?? Initial state fully saturated (CGC) Enormous increase of high-pT processes over RHIC Plenty of heavy quarks (b,c) Weakly interacting probes become available (Z0, W) LHC RHIC SPS Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

3 ATLAS as a Heavy Ion Detector is:
An Excellent Calorimetry A large acceptance Inner Tracker A hermetic Muon Spectrometer Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

4 ATLAS as a Heavy Ion Detector
1. Excellent Calorimetry Hermetic coverage up to || < 4.9 High granularity (.025x.025 electromagnetic, .1x.1 hadronic) with fine longitudinal segmentation (~7 sections) Very good jet energy resolution (50%/sqrt(E) in pp) High pT probes (jets, jet shapes, jet correlations, 0) Large Acceptance Muon Spectrometer Coverage up to || < 2.7 Muons from , J/, Z0 decays Inner Detector (Si Pixels and Strips, no TRT used) Large coverage up to || < 2.5 High granularity pixel and strip detectors (o~1%,10%) Good momentum resolution (dpT/pT~3% up to 15GeV) Tracking particles with pT  0.5 GeV/c 1.& 3. Global event characterization (dNch/dη, dET/dη, flow); Jet quenching study 2.+ 3. Heavy quarks(b), quarkonium suppression(J/ ,) Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

5 And it is coming SOON ! Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

6 Studies of the Detector Performance
Constraint: No modifications to the detector, except for trigger and probably very forward region Simulations: HIJING event generator, dNch/dη = 3200 Full GEANT simulations of the detector response Large event samples: |η|< impact parameter range: b = fm (27,000 events) |η|< impact parameter range: b = fm (5,000 events) Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

7 Predicted Detector Occupancies
b = 0 – 1fm Calorimeters ( |η|< 3.2 ) Si detectors: Pixels < 2% SCT < 20% TRT: - High occupancy for tracking - Still visible TR signal for electrons -> Limited usage for AA collisions is under investigation Will be fully useful for pA Muon Chambers: 0.3 – 0.9 hits/chamber (<< pp at 1034 cm-2 s-1) Average ET (uncalibrated): ~ 2 GeV/Tower ~ .3 GeV/Tower Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

8 Day One Physics with ATLAS
Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

9 Global Event Characterization
Day-one measurements: Nch, dNch/d, b, ET, dET/d Single Pb+Pb event, b =0-1fm Nch(|| < 3) Histogram – true Nch Points – reconstructed Nch dNch/d|=0 3200 (HIJING, no quenching) 10% <3% No track reconstruction, only Nhits calibrated with pp Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

10 Correlation of Signals with Flow
Data Type V2 (R)  Hit clusters, Pixel layer 1 0.042 Hit clusters, Pixel layer 2 0.036 Hit clusters, Pixel layer 3 0.032 EM Barrel Calo 0.029 EM EndCap Calo 0.031 EM FCAL Calo HAD FCAL Calo 0.025 V2=0.042 Same properties of Φ production assumed in my simulations. Some properties of Φ generator used may slightly differ: shape of rapidity (or pseudorapidity?) distribution, vertex Z distribution! (strongly affects final rates) Used latest magnetic field and PR01 geometry (fdor AuAu studies). -R v2Truth = 0.05 Distribution of azimuthal angle  (v2) vs true reaction plane position, R Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

11 Jet Physics Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

12 For a 106s run with Pb+Pb at L=41026 cm-2 s-1
Jet Rates For a 106s run with Pb+Pb at L=41026 cm-2 s-1 we expect in |η| < 2.5: ET threshold Njets 50 GeV 30  106 100 GeV 1.5  105 150 GeV 1.9  105 200 GeV 4.4  104 And also: ~106  + jet events ~500 Z0() + jets with ET > 40 GeV Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

13 Jet reconstruction efficiency
Pb-Pb collisions (b= 0 –1 fm) Angular resolution for 70 GeV jets Efficiency Fake rate ~2  resolution in pp Pb-Pb Energy resolution p-p Two jet finder algorithms testet up to now - Sliding Window and Cone Fit For ET > 75GeV: efficiency > 95%, fake < 5% Good energy and angular resolution Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

14 Jet Quenching Studies To determine medium properties we need to measure jet shapes 3 methods explored so far: Fragmentation function using tracking Core ET and jet profile using calorimeters Neutral leading hadrons using EM calorimeters vacuum in medium Most of energy is radiated inside a narrow cone (Salgado & Wiedemann hep-ph/ ) Quenching may depend on quark flavor: - Tagging of b-jets using impact parameter Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

15 Jet Studies with Tracks dN/djT broader in PbPb than in pp
Jets with ET = 100 GeV Cone radius of 0.4 Track pT > 3 GeV Momentum component perpendicular to jet axis Fragmentation function dN/djT broader in PbPb than in pp (background fluctuations) PbPb  HIJING-unquenched  pp Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

16 Jet ETcore Measurements
Energy deposited in a narrow cone around the jet axis: R < 0.11 (HADCal), R < 0.07 (EMCal) pp PbPb <ETcore> sensitive to ~10% change in ETjet More work is needed to minimize effect of background fluctuations. The background has not been subtracted: <ETcore>PbPb  <ETcore>pp Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

17 Isolated Neutral Hadrons
Select jets that have an isolated neutral cluster along the axis (~1% of the total jet sample) Jets with ET >75GeV embedded into central PbPb events: pp Gauss =4.5% Relative error on the measurement of the neutral cluster ET. Cluster ET sensitive to small change in ETjet Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

18 b-quark Jet Tagging Motivation: Heavy quarks may radiate less energy in the dense medium (dead-cone effect) than light quarks. b-tagging capabilities offer additional tool to understand quenching. To evaluate b-tagging performance: ppWHlbb events overlayed on HIJING background have been used. A displaced vertex in the Inner Detector has been searched for. Rejection factor against u-jets ~ 100 for b-tagging efficiency of 25% Should be improved by optimized algorithms and with soft muon tagging in the Muon Spec. Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

19 Physics with Muon Spectrometer Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

20 +- reconstruction
  +– Muons momenta measured by ID tracks tagged by coincidence with track segment in -spectrometer pT >3 GeV ||  1 ||  2 ||  2.5 Acceptance + efficiency 4.7% 12.5% 17.5% Resolution 123 MeV 145 MeV 159 MeV S/B 0.3 0.2 S/√ S+B 37 46 55 Rate/month 15,000 ||  2 For |η| < 2 (12.5% acc+eff) we expect 15K /month of 106s at L=41026 cm-2 s-1 Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

21 J/+- reconstruction
||  2.5, pT  1.5 GeV ||  2.5 pT > 3 GeV pT > 1.5 GeV Acceptance + efficiency 0.055% 0.530% Resolution 68 MeV S/B 0.4 0.15 S/√ S+B 56 113 Rate/month 11,000 104,000 We expect 8K to 100K J/+- per month of 106s at L=41026 cm-2 s-1 If a trigger is possible forward with a muon pT >1.5 GeV, we gain a factor 4 in statistics…A solution might be to reduce the toroidal field for HI runs Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

22 Other issues Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

23 Ultra-Peripheral Nuclear Collisions Proton-Nucleus Collisions
High-energy - and -nucleus collisions Measurements of hadron structure at high energies (above HERA) Di-jet and heavy quark production Tagging of UPC requires a Zero Degree Calorimeter Ongoing work on ZDC design and integration with the accelerator instrumentation: Proton-Nucleus Collisions Link between pp and AA physics Study of the nuclear modification of the gluon distribution at low xF. Study of the jet fragmentation function modification Full detector capabilities (including TRT) will be available. L~1030 translates to about 1MHz interaction rate (compare to 40 MHz in pp) Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

24 CONCLUSION ATLAS has a very good potential for making a valuable and significant contribution to the LHC’s heavy-ion physics programme: x z y Global variable measurement on Day1 dN/dη, dET/dη, elliptic flow. Jet measurement and jet quenching Quarkonia suppression (J/Ψ, ) p-A physics Ultra-Peripheral Collisions (UPC) More will come Direct information from QGP Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

25 Back-up material Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

26 Heavy Ion Physics with the ATLAS Detector
Pavel Nevski Brookhaven National Laboratory On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

27 ATLAS as a Heavy Ion Detector :
Good Tracker Excellent Calorimetry Large Acceptance Muon Spectrometer Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

28 Central Pb+Pb Collision (b<1fm)
Nch(|η|0.5) Scenario with 3,200 charged particle per rapidity unit: About 70,000 stable particles, ~ 40,000 particles in ||  3 CPU for simulations – 6 h per central event (800MHz,G3) Occupancy ~2% in pixels, 20% in strips, Calorimeter in 0.1x0.1: 2 GeV e.m. But only 0.3 GeV in Tile Event size 50MB (without TRT and with no zero-suppression) Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

29 Tracking Performance For pT: 1 - 10 GeV/c: efficiency ~ 70 %
Standard ATLAS reconstruction for pp is used, not optimized for PbPb. Pixel and SCT detectors pT threshold of 1 GeV (used in this preliminary studies) tracking cuts: At least 10 hits out of 11(13) available in the barrel (end-caps) All three pixel hits At most 1 shared hits 2/dof < 4 For pT: GeV/c: efficiency ~ 70 % fake rate ~ 5% Momentum resolution ~ 3% (2% - barrel, 4-5% end-caps) Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

30 Electron-pion separation in TRT
Pion fraction vs electron efficiency In central Pb-PB collisions (3200 ch.particle per rapidity unit) factor 20 in pion rejection can be achieved by selecting a TR threshold corresponding to 50% electron efficiency Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

31 Day-one measurements: Nch, dNch/d, ET, dET/d, b
Global Measurements Day-one measurements: Nch, dNch/d, ET, dET/d, b Constrain model prediction Indispensable for all physics analyses Predictions for Pb+Pb central collisions at LHC (dNch/d)0 Model/data ~ HIJING:with quenching, no shadowing ~ HIJING:with quenching, with shadowing ~ HIJING:no quenching, no shadowing ~ Saturation Model (Kharzeev & Nardi) ~ Extrapolation from lower energy data Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

32 Use 3 detector systems to obtain impact parameter:
Collision Centrality Use 3 detector systems to obtain impact parameter: Pixel&SCT, EM-Cal HAD-Cal Resolution of the estimated impact parameter ~1fm for all three systems. Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

33 ATLAS Calorimeters Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

34 Jet studies PYTHIA jets embedded with central Pb-Pb HIJING events
Reconstruction: - sliding window algorithm ΔΦxΔη =0.4x0.4 with splitting/merging after background energy subtraction (average and local) - ET fitting with Gaussian+constant background Average background 50 ±11 GeV (Pb-Pb Hijing, b=0-1 fm) => threshold for jet reconstruction ~30-40 GeV in calorimeter cf p-p ~ 15 GeV Studies of algorithm optimization is underway Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

35 Quarkonia suppression
Color screening prevents various ψ, , χ states to be formed when T→Ttrans to QGP (color screening length < size of resonance) Modification of the potential can be studied by a systematic measurement of heavy quarkonia states characterized by different binding energies and dissociation temperatures ~thermometer for the plasma Upsilon family (1s) (2s) (3s) Binding energies (GeV) Dissociation at the temperature ~2.5Ttrans ~0.9Ttrans ~0.7Ttrans =>Important to separate (1s) and (2s) Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

36 Upsilon Reconstruction
  +– Overlay  decays on top of HIJING events. Use combined info from ID and μ-Spectrometer Single Upsilons HIJING background (Half ’s from c, b decays, half from π, K decays for pT>3 GeV) Background rejection: 2 cut geometrical    cut pT cut. Momentum resolution is worse at higher rapidity due to material ,: differences between ID and µ-spectrometer tracks after back-extrapolation to the vertex for the best 2 association. Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005

37 Summary Global observables, including elliptic flow, should be accessible from day-one, even with a very low luminosity (early scheme) Jet physics (jet quenching) is very promising, jet reconstruction is possible despite the additional background, possibility to study separately light and heavy q-jets Heavy-quarkonia physics (suppression in dense matter) well accessible, capability to measure and separate  and ’, to measure the J/ using a specially developed  tagging method Ongoing studies: - Optimization of algorithms for high-multiplicity environment - The flow effects and its impact on the jet reconstruction - pA collisions ATLAS has a very good potential for making a valuable and significant contribution to the LHC’s heavy-ion physics programme Pavel Nevski, BNL QM2005


Download ppt "Heavy Ion Physics with the ATLAS Detector"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google