Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Spring Applied Burndown Options for Control of Glyphosate-resistant Horseweed T.W. Eubank D.H. Poston, V.K. Nandula, D.B. Reynolds, D.R. Shaw, H.R. Robinson,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Spring Applied Burndown Options for Control of Glyphosate-resistant Horseweed T.W. Eubank D.H. Poston, V.K. Nandula, D.B. Reynolds, D.R. Shaw, H.R. Robinson,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Spring Applied Burndown Options for Control of Glyphosate-resistant Horseweed
T.W. Eubank D.H. Poston, V.K. Nandula, D.B. Reynolds, D.R. Shaw, H.R. Robinson, J.B. Blessitt, R.T. Coleman, and T. Evans

2 Horseweed (Conyza canadensis)

3 Horseweed Emergence vs Temp1
Eubank, 2006 1Averaged 3 locations

4 Introduction Horseweed has been documented to be resistant to many herbicide modes of action across the U.S. including, Glyphosate Paraquat ALS Inhibitors Triazines Ureas Heap, 2005

5 Introduction The widespread adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and the advent of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) has created a need for research investigating alternative measures of control for this troublesome weed.

6 Introduction Determining the most efficacious chemical means for controlling horseweed is imperative in reducing possible crop yield losses due to competition.

7 Objectives Determine the most effective chemical burndown options for emerged horseweed populations. Evaluate the impact of various burndown herbicides on horseweed populations.

8 Chemical Control

9 Chemical Control Materials and Methods
RCB, 4 replications Plots: 10 x 40 ft Tractor mounted 15 gal/acre Applied April 5, 2005 and March 15, 2006 Horseweed: 4 – 6 in tall

10 Chemical Control Materials and Methods
Burndown treatments alone/+ tank-mix Roundup 0.77 lb ae/a Gramoxone 0.75 ai/a Ignite 0.42 lb ai/a Burndown treatments alone Roundup 1.12 lb ae/a Gramoxone 0.88 ai/a Ignite 0.53 lb ai/a

11 Chemical Control Materials and Methods
Tank-mixed herbicide treatments lb ae/a lb ai/a lb ai/a 0.5 lb ai/a 1 lb ai/a Harmony lb ai/a Clarity lb ai/a Untreated

12 Chemical Control Materials and Methods
All data analyzed in SAS with the PROC GLM procedure Means separated using Fisher’s protected LSD test (p = 0.05)

13 Horseweed Control with WeatherMax Based Burndown1
1 Treatments shown based on 4 WAT. Horseweed 4-6 in tall lbs ae/a with all tank mixes. Averaged from 2005 – 2006. LSD (0.05) = 8

14 Horseweed Populations with WeatherMax Based Burndown1
1 Horseweed plants/m2 at 6 WAT lb ae/a with all tank mixes. Averaged from 2005 – 2006. LSD (0.05) = 41

15 Untreated 4 WAT

16 WeatherMax 0.77 lb ae/a 2 WAT

17 WeatherMax 0.77 lb ae/a 4 WAT

18 Horseweed Control with Inteon Based Burndown1
1 Treatments shown based on 4 WAT. Horseweed 4-6 in tall lb ai/a with all tank mixes. Averaged from 2005 – 2006. LSD (0.05) = 8

19 Horseweed Populations with Inteon Based Burndown1
1 Horseweed plants/m2 at 6 WAT lb ai/a with all tank mixes. Averaged from 2005 – 2006. LSD (0.05) = 39

20 Inteon 0.75 lb ai/a 2 WAT

21 Inteon 0.75 lb ai/a 4 WAT

22 Horseweed Control with Ignite Based Burndown1
1 Treatments shown based on 4 WAT. Horseweed 4-6 in tall lb ai/a with all tank mixes. Averaged from 2005 – 2006. LSD (0.05) = 5

23 Horseweed Populations with Ignite Based Burndown1
1 Horseweed plants/m2 at 6 WAT lb ai/a with all tank mixes. Averaged from 2005 – 2006. LSD (0.05) = 14

24 Ignite 0.42 lb ai/a 2 WAT

25 Ignite 0.42 lb ai/a 4 WAT

26 Conclusions WeatherMax alone provided only 63 – 73% control of horseweed 4 WAT. The addition of 2,4-D or Clarity improved WeatherMax control to greater than 90% and reduced horseweed populations by 99% compared to the untreated check.

27 Conclusions Inteon alone treated plants quickly recovered and by 4 WAT provided only 55 – 60% control. The addition of 2,4-D or Clarity to Inteon significantly improved control to 83%, however, horseweed populations were reduced by only 44% and 52%, respectively, when compared to the untreated.

28 Conclusions Ignite applied alone provided better than 92% control of horseweed and all tank-mix treatments were generally better than 86%. Horseweed populations were reduced by greater than 88% when Ignite was tank-mixed, while Ignite alone reduced populations only 65%.

29 Conclusions New horseweed emergence, after burndown alone treatments, could be responsible for slight increase in horseweed populations as compared to burndown + tank-mix treatments.

30 Special Thanks V.K. Nandula R.T. Coleman J.B. Blessitt T.H. Gibson
T.A. Evans H.R. Robinson E. Graves

31 Questions?


Download ppt "Spring Applied Burndown Options for Control of Glyphosate-resistant Horseweed T.W. Eubank D.H. Poston, V.K. Nandula, D.B. Reynolds, D.R. Shaw, H.R. Robinson,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google