Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chromaticity decay and snapback

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chromaticity decay and snapback"— Presentation transcript:

1 Chromaticity decay and snapback
CERN, LBOC meeting, 17th April 2012 Chromaticity decay and snapback Nicholas Aquilina TE-MSC-MDT Acknowledgements: E. Todesco, M. Lamont, G. Papotti, EICs

2 Overview Chromaticity decay during injection Chromaticity snapback
recall of 2011 situation 2012 beam measurements analysis and proposed model based on 2012 beam measurements Chromaticity snapback Chromaticity decay during flattop 17/04/2012

3 b3 decay and snapback We need to model and correct the b3 component
Chromaticity depends on the b3 (1 unit b3 = 45 Q’) decay snapback snapback decay 17/04/2012

4 Chromaticity decay during injection
Parameter Magnetic measurements 2011 beam measurements 2011 expected at 4 TeV τ‘ (s) 200 1000* - d' 0.66 0.5 c' 20 units 16 units 19 units *First data points were after 15 injection For 2012 operation, energy has been increased from 3.5 to 4 TeV, an increase of 20% is expected in the decay amplitude 17/04/2012

5 2012 beam measurements Fill no 2395 2404 2406 Date 24/03/12 25/03/12
Lattice sextupoles constant Spool pieces constant (no decay, no snapback correction) dynamic (decay and snapback correction) First data point after injection plateau 500 s 210 s 50 s tinj 51 minutes 90 minutes 6 hours Previous cycle tFT 9 hours 17 minutes tprep 24 minutes 17/04/2012

6 Fill 2395 – the “naked” ramp decay decay snapback 17/04/2012

7 Fill 2406 (with dynamic correction)
17/04/2012 FiDeL model was based on this measurement

8 2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406
17/04/2012

9 2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406
17/04/2012

10 2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406
17/04/2012

11 2012 FiDeL model as obtained from Fill 2406
17/04/2012

12 FiDeL model based on Fill 2406 Scaled for a pre-cycle case
2012 FiDeL parameters FiDeL model based on Fill 2406 previous IFT 6740 A previous tFT 17 minutes previous tprep 23 minutes c 20 units d 0.44 tau 600 s Scaled for a pre-cycle case 6740 A 10 minutes 20 minutes 17 units* 0.44 600 s using powering history scaling law *Decay amplitude for pre cycle is 17 units w.r.t. 19 units expected from scaling of 2011 beam measurements 17/04/2012

13 2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395
17/04/2012

14 2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395
17/04/2012

15 2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395
17/04/2012

16 2012 FiDeL model compared with Fill 2395
17/04/2012

17 Implementation of new FiDeL
The new parameters have been used in the CCC since Friday 6th April With new parameters chromaticity is kept within 1 unit (over a duration of 20 – 30 minutes) 17/04/2012

18 Fill 2478 17/04/2012

19 Fill 2479 17/04/2012

20 Fill 2480 17/04/2012

21 Snapback analysis from Fill 2395
17/04/2012

22 Snapback Parameters for snapback correction
Fitting parameters as obtained for the snapback parameter b3 Qh’ b1 b3 Qh’ b2 b3 Qv’ b1 b3 Qv’ b2 ∆b3 0.63 0.66 0.74 0.75 ∆I (A) 11 9 13 12 gSB 0.057 0.072 0.061 delta chroma 28 29 Parameters for snapback correction 2012 gSB 0.06 this implies that the snapback is slower 2011 gSB 0.176 based on series magnetic measurements – but evidence from beam that correction was not perfect 17/04/2012

23 Snapback modelling 2012 FiDeL fit (red curve) versus beam measurements (fill 2395 – the « naked ramp ») 17/04/2012

24 Decay during flattop at 4 TeV
Fitting parameters as obtained for the decay during flattop (Fill 2395) No asymmetry between the vertical and horizontal plane parameter Qh’ b1 Qh’ b2 Qv’ b1 Qv’ b2 c -4.95 -4.73 5.08 4.36 d 0.43 0.51 0.65 0.49 tau 48 63 191 89 vx -11.74 -11.54 -10.69 -10.70 Parameters for decay correction c d tau 4.78 0.52 100 s 17/04/2012

25 Decay during flattop at 4 TeV
17/04/2012

26 Decay during flattop at 4 TeV
17/04/2012

27 Fill 2452 17/04/2012

28 Fill 2466 17/04/2012

29 Conclusions Decay during injection Snapback Decay during flattop
decay amplitude increased by 5% from 2011 operation time constant is around 600 s (more data was available during the first moments of injection) correction is in place and it is working chromaticity decay is kept within 1 unit Snapback gSB is found to be smaller, therefore slower snapback not implemented yet Decay during flattop a correction using the spool pieces is in place and active 17/04/2012


Download ppt "Chromaticity decay and snapback"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google