1. © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Effect of various treatments on AUDPC of powdery mildew (Erysiphe pisi var. pisi) of pea in field at IAAS, Rampur,
Chitwan, Nepal
Treatments
AUDPC 1
AUDPC 2
AUDPC 3
Mean AUDPC
Total AUDPC
Cow skimmed
186.66±8.39
206.12±15.72b
182.77±21.1b
191.85±14.2b
575.55±42.7b
171.12±5.4
180.84±5.83bc
151.66±12.1bc
167.87±5.93bc
503.62±17.78bc
conidia/ml
159.44±8.09
161.39±11.62c
118.62±16.91c
146.49±1.04c
439.46±36.13c
Control
191.52±15.1
261.52±12.65a
344.16±13.24a
265.73±10.41a
797.20±31.22a
P-value
0.204 **
***
0.0003**
0.0003***
LSD Ns
40.148
58.248
38.729
CV (%)
12.099
12.397
18.271
12.546
Grand mean
Means in a column having same letter(s) do not differ significantly at 5% probability by DMRT.
LSD = Least Significant Difference.
Ateet Maharjan et al. Efficacy Assessment of Treatment Methods against Powdery Mildew Disease of Pea (Pisum
sativum L.) Caused by Erysiphe pisi var. pisi. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6,
doi: /wjar-3-6-1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.