Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Alice T. Shaw, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Alice T. Shaw, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine"— Presentation transcript:

1 Evidence-Based Treatment for ALK and ROS1 Rearrangement- Positive NSCLC
Alice T. Shaw, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Director, Center for Thoracic Cancers Paula O'Keefe Endowed Chair in Thoracic Oncology MGH Cancer Center/Center for Thoracic Cancers Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Massachusetts NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

2 About These Slides Please feel free to use, update, and share some or all of these slides in your noncommercial presentations to colleagues or patients When using our slides, please retain the source attribution: These slides may not be published, posted online, or used in commercial presentations without permission. Please contact for details Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Disclaimer: The materials published on the Clinical Care Options Web site reflect the views of the authors of the CCO material, not those of Clinical Care Options, LLC, the CME providers, or the companies providing educational grants. The materials may discuss uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. A qualified healthcare professional should be consulted before using any therapeutic product discussed. Readers should verify all information and data before treating patients or using any therapies described in these materials.

3 Faculty Disclosure Alice T. Shaw, MD, PhD, has disclosed that she has received consulting fees from Ariad, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Genentech, Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Taiho. This slide lists the faculty who were involved in the production of these slides.

4 Case 1: Newly Diagnosed Stage IV NSCLC
45-yr-old female never-smoker nurse with no past medical history Developed fatigue, trace hemoptysis, and wheezing CT/PET demonstrated a 2.3-cm left hilar mass, bilateral pulmonary nodules, enlarged subcarinal nodes, and multiple liver masses; brain MRI negative Bronchoscopy and transbronchial biopsy: undifferentiated high-grade NSCLC Molecular testing: negative for EGFR/KRAS mutations, ALK-positive NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

5 ALK Gene Rearrangements
Most common in younger nonsmokers with adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, and rarely SCC Frequency: 4% overall, 33% in EGFR-negative never-smokers Several ALK variants identified in NSCLC Testing Vysis break apart FISH (> 15% cells with split signal in 50 nuclei scored); ALK IHC also approved ALK next generation sequencing 3 agents now approved for ALK-positive NSCLC (first line and/or after progression) NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; SCC, small-cell carcinoma. Shaw AT, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27: Soda M, et al. Nature. 2007;448: Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

6 PROFILE 1014: First-line Crizotinib vs Pemetrexed/Platinum
PROFILE 1014: First-line Crizotinib vs Pemetrexed/Platinum* in Advanced NSCLC Phase III trial (N = 343) ALK-positive pts with nonsquamous NSCLC and no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease Crizotinib (n = 172) Chemotherapy (n = 171) Median PFS, mos 10.9 7.0 HR (95% CI) 0.45 ( ) P value < .001 ORR, % 74 45 100 80 60 40 20 Crizotinib PFS (%) CT, chemotherapy; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Pts at Risk, n Crizotinib CT Mos *Carboplatin or cisplatin. 65 36 38 12 19 2 7 1 1 0 0 0 Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Solomon BJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:

7 PROFILE 1014: Select AEs of Any Cause With ≥ 5% Difference Between Treatment Groups
AEs (≥ 20%, Either Arm), n (%) Crizotinib (n = 171) Chemotherapy (n = 169) Any Grade Grade 3/4 Higher frequency (≥ 5% absolute difference) in crizotinib arm Vision disorder 122 (71) 1 (1) 16 (9) Diarrhea 105 (61) 4 (2) 22 (13) Edemac 83 (49) 21 (12) Vomiting 78 (46) 3 (2) 60 (36) 5 (3) Constipation 74 (43) 51 (30) Elevated transaminases 61 (36) 24 (14) Higher frequency (≥ 5% absolute difference) in chemotherapy arm Fatigue 49 (29) 65 (38) Neutropenia 36 (21) 19 (11) 26 (15) Stomatitis 34 (20) 2 (1) Asthenia 41 (24) Anemia 15 (9) 54 (32) AE, adverse event. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Solomon BJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:

8 J-ALEX: Alectinib vs Crizotinib as First-line Therapy for ALK-Positive NSCLC
Alectinib (n = 103) Crizotinib (n = 104) Events, n (%) Median, mos (95% CI) P value HR ( % CI) 25 (24.3) NR (20.3-NR) 58 (55.8) 10.2 ( ) 100 < ( ) 80 60 NR PFS (%) 40 NR, not reached; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer. 20 10.2 mos 1 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 Pts at Risk, n Alectinib Crizotinib Mos 93 86 76 65 49 40 36 21 27 14 9 4 1 Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Nokihara H, et al. ASCO Abstract 9007.

9 J-ALEX: Safety AEs (≥ 20%, Either Arm), n (%) Alectinib (n = 103) Crizotinib (n = 104) All Grade Grade 3/4 Constipation 36 (35.0) 1 (1.0) 46 (44.2) Nausea 11 (10.7) 77 (74.0) 2 (1.9) Diarrhea 9 (8.7) 76 (73.1) Vomiting 6 (5.8) 60 (57.7) AST increase 32 (30.8) 5 (4.8) ALT increase 33 (31.7) 13 (12.5) Visual disturbance 57 (54.8) Nasopharyngitis 21 (20.4) 24 (23.1) Dysgeusia 19 (18.4) 54 (51.9) Pyrexia 10 (9.7) 21 (20.2) Decreased appetite AE, adverse event; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase;. 8.7% alectinib discontinuations due to AE vs 20.2% for crizotinib 29.1% alectinib dose interruptions due to AE vs 74.0% for crizotinib Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Nokihara H, et al. ASCO Abstract 9008.

10 ASCEND-4: First-line Ceritinib Vs Chemotherapy for ALK-Positive NSCLC
Randomized, global, open-label phase III study Primary endpoint: PFS Median DoR of 23.9 mos for pts treated with ceritinib Median PFS of 26.3 mos for pts without brain metastases at screening treated with ceritinib Efficacy outcome Ceritinib (n = 189) Chemotherapy (n = 187) HR P Value Median PFS, mos 16.6 8.1 0.55 < .001 ORR, % 72.5 26.7 -- OIRR, % 72.7 (n = 22) 27.3 (n = 22) DoR, duration of response; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; OIRR, overall intracranial response rate Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com De Castro G, et al. WCLC Abstract PL03.07.

11 Case 2: Progressive ALK-Positive NSCLC
66-yr-old female never-smoker diagnosed more than 3 yrs ago with metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC Brain MRI at diagnosis with 2 tiny brain metastases (2-3 mm) She was started on first-line crizotinib and responded both systemically and intracranially However, restaging scans after 7 mos demonstrated worsening bone mets and recurrence of the 2 brain metastases No symptoms of progressive disease NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

12 Response to Ceritinib or Alectinib in Previously Treated ALK-Positive NSCLC
100 Ceritinib Ceritinib (2014) and alectinib (2015) approved for pts with ALK- positive, metastatic NSCLC with disease progression on or who are intolerant to crizotinib 80 60 PD 40 Change From Baseline in SLDs (%) 20 SD -20 -40 -60 PR + CR -80 -100 Alectinib 140 120 Systemic best overall response 100 PD (n = 11) SD (n = 18) PR (n = 35) 80 NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; SLDs, sum of the longest diameters. 60 SLD, Maximum Decrease From Baseline (%) 40 20 -20 -40 -60 -80 -100 Pts Kim DW, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17: Shaw AT, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17: Ou SH, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34: Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

13 Second-Generation ALK Inhibitors
Phase Prior Cri? ORR, % Median PFS, Mos Ceritinib ASCEND-1[1] ASCEND-2[2] ASCEND-3[3] ASCEND-5 [4] 163 83 140 124 231 I II III Yes No 56.0 72.0 38.6 63.7 39.1 6.9 18.4 5.7 11.1 5.4 Alectinib Shaw[5] Ou[6] 87 138 48.0 50.0 8.1 8.9 Brigatinib[7] 222 45.0 (90 mg QD) 54.0 (180 mg QD) 15.6 (90 mg QD) NR (180 mg QD) Cri, ceritinib; NR, not reached. 1. Kim DW, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17: Mok T, et al. ASCO Abstract Felip E, et al. ASCO Abstract Scagliotti G, et al. ESMO Abstract LBA42_PR. 5. Shaw AT, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17: Ou SH, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34: Kim DW, et al. ASCO Abstract 9007. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

14 Key Treatment-Related AEs Associated With ALK Inhibitors
AE, % (All Grades) Crizotinib[1] Ceritinib[2,3] Alectinib[2,4] Brigatinib[2,5] Visual disorders 50-60 NR Liver dysfunction 35-40 15-35 10-25 15 GI effects 40-60 60-85 10-15 25-40 Edema 20-30 15-25 Fatigue 15-30 40-45 25-30 HTN 21 AE, adverse event; GI, gastrointestinal; HTN, hypertension; NR, not reported. Predominantly grade 1/2 Visual disorders: median onset < 2 wks GI effects include diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting 1. Rothenstein JM, et al. Curr Oncol.2014;21: Liao BC, et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2015;7: Kim DW, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17: Ou S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34: Kim DW, et al. ASCO 2016.Abstract 9007. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

15 Second-Generation ALK Inhibitor CNS Activity
100 *No previous ALK inhibitor. 90 80 75.0% 67.0% 70 63.0%* 58.8%* 57.0% 60 Brain ORR (%) 50 39.4% 39.0% 40 36.0% 36.0% 30 20 CNS, central nervous system. 10 (n = 8) (n = 28) (n = 33) (n = 17) (n = 16) (n = 35) (n = 25) (n = 18) (n = 18) Ceritinib (750 mg/day) Alectinib (600 mg BID) Brigatinib (90 or 180 mg QD) Lorlatinib (Various) Kim DW, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17: Mok T, et al. ASCO Abstract Felip E, et al. ASCO Abstract Shaw AT, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17: Ou S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34: Kim DW, et al. ASCO Abstract Solomon BJ, et al. ASCO Abstract 9009. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

16 Resistance to Second-Generation ALK TKIs
Ceritinib (N = 24) Alectinib (N = 17) Brigatinib (N = 6) WT WT WT TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; WT, wild type. L1196M G1202R E1210K G1202del ALK WT G1269A I1171T/N/S F1174C ≥ 2 ALK mutations C1156Y S1206Y V1180L ALK amplification Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Gainor JF, et al. Cancer Discovery. 2016;6:

17 Lorlatinib Inhibits All Known Crizotinib-Resistance Mutations, Including ALK G1202R
Pt 1: ALK+ NSCLC Previously treated with crizotinib and ceritinib Local molecular testing after ceritinib with ALK G1202R Started lorlatinib at 75 mg QD Dose reduced to 50 mg QD Ongoing at > 16 mos Pt 2: ALK+ NSCLC Previously treated with crizotinib and brigatinib Local molecular testing after brigatinib with ALK G1202R Started lorlatinib at 200 mg QD Dose reduced to 100 mg QD Ongoing at > 12 mos NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Shaw AT, et al. ASCO Abstract 8018.

18 Summary: ALK-Driven Disease
All nonsquamous NSCLC should be tested for ALK mutations Pts tend to develop brain metastases Crizotinib improves response rate and PFS over chemotherapy in first-line and second-line settings Second-generation ALK inhibitors ceritinib and alectinib are approved for secondary refractory disease or intolerance to crizotinib Second-generation ALK inhibitors active in CNS disease Alectinib demonstrated improved response rate and PFS over crizotinib as first-line therapy (J-ALEX) Many ALK-positive pts may derive benefit from multiple sequential ALK inhibitors CNS, central nervous system; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

19 Case 3: Newly Diagnosed Stage IV NSCLC
66-yr-old female with history of light smoking (a few cigarettes/day x 20 yrs) She developed cough, dyspnea, and left lower back pain radiating down the left leg Chest CT revealed a 6-cm left lower lobe mass, innumerable pulmonary nodules, extensive mediastinal lymphadenopathy; PET scan with extensive metastatic disease CT-guided biopsy of the lung mass: poorly differentiated NSCLC, favor adenocarcinoma Molecular testing: EGFR wild type, ALK-negative, ROS1- rearrangement positive; PD-L1 IHC 30% NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer.

20 ROS1 Fusion Most common in younger pts, never-smokers, adenocarcinoma, high-grade histology[1] Frequency: 1.2% to 1.7% overall[2] Several variants identified; clinical significance unknown[3] FIG-, CD74-, SCL34A2-, TPM3-, SDC4-, EZR-, LRIG3, KDELR2-, and CCDC6- Testing: Vysis break apart FISH (> 15% cells with split signal in 50 nuclei scored)[4-6] ROS1 NGS, PCR, IHC (not validated) Crizotinib highly active; FDA approved in March 2016 for ROS1- positive NSCLC[7] NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer. 1. Bergethon K, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30: Davies KD, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18: Takeuchi K, et al. Nat Med. 2012;18: Gu TL, et al. PLoS One. 2011;6:e Birch AH, et al. PLoS One. 2011;6:e Lee J, et al. Cancer. 2013;119: Shaw AT, et al. ASCO Abstract 7508. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

21 Activity of Crizotinib in Pts With ROS1 Fusions: Best Overall Response
Pts With NSCLC Who Tested Positive for ROS1 Fusion (N = 50) 100 PD SD PR CR 80 60 72% ORR Median PFS: 19.2 mos (95% CI: 14.4-NR) 40 20 Change From Baseline (%) -20 NR, not reached; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease. -40 -60 -80 -100 Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Shaw AT, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:

22 Prolonged PFS With Crizotinib in ROS1-Positive NSCLC
1.0 Median PFS: 19.2 mos 0.8 0.6 Probability of PFS 0.4 NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer. 0.2 5 10 15 20 25 Mos FDA approved in 2016 for ROS1-positive NSCLC Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com Shaw AT, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:

23 Summary: ROS1-Driven Disease
All nonsquamous NSCLC should be tested for ROS1 mutations Crizotinib is highly active in patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC ORR of approximately 70% Prolonged PFS Crizotinib is approved by the FDA for pts with ROS1- positive NSCLC and is the guideline recommended first- line therapy option in this setting NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer. Slide credit: clinicaloptions.com

24 Go Online for More CCO Coverage of Lung Cancer!
Online Interactive Treatment Decision Tool CME-Certified Expert-Authored Modules Expert ClinicalThought Commentaries Interactive Virtual Presentation Downloadable Slidesets clinicaloptions.com/oncology


Download ppt "Alice T. Shaw, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google