Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Interview Interrogation Two way conversation Adversarial questioning

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Interview Interrogation Two way conversation Adversarial questioning"— Presentation transcript:

1 Interview Interrogation Two way conversation Adversarial questioning
Accusatory

2 Interviews Conducted as soon as possible after an incident
Separate witnesses to avoid melding of their recollection of the event The witness talks and you listen – carefully Introduce yourself Have pertinent info about the case or the reason for the questioning before you begin the interview Know as much as you can about the person you are interviewing – if possible

3 Interview Schedule a time if possible – make sure it is enough time for a complete interview Video or audio recording is best – take notes only if you have to Signed statement upon conclusion of interview Interviewee places initials at beginning and end of each paragraph

4 Interrogation Miranda MCJA mandate to record custodial interrogations
“Record” includes… Digital Electronic Audio Video Other recording equipment

5 Custodial Interrogation
A reasonable person would consider that person to be in custody in view of the circumstances The person is asked a question by a LEO that is likely to elicit an incriminating response

6 Serious Crimes At a minimum, all Class A,B and C crimes in: Chapter 9 - Offenses Against the Person Chapter 11 – Sexual Assaults Chapter 12 – Sexual Exploitation of Minors Chapter 13 – Kidnapping and Criminal Restraint Chapter 27 – Robbery Of the Maine Criminal Code and all corresponding juvenile offenses

7 Recording Requirement Exceptions
Not feasible – including equipment malfunction Spontaneous statements not in response to interrogation Statements made in response to questions routinely asked during the booking process Statements made during custodial interrogation when the investigator is unaware that a serious crime has occurred When the person who is the subject of the interrogation refuses to have the interrogation recorded – in writing or on a recording

8

9 Suspect ID Show ups Photo Line up 99.9% of time – don’t do them
Suggestive Photo Line up Sequential – one at a time Simultaneous – all at once Blind administrator – person showing does not know who is the suspect On a scale of one to ten….

10 Reports Notes – dated notebook
Retained if more than what goes into your report - discoverable If all the info is in your report they can be destroyed The person reading it wasn’t there – be descriptive

11 Reports Concise – Accurate – factual, grammar, spelling, phone numbers, DOB’s Complete – elements of the crime Unbiased In chronological order Based on….

12 Reports Witness statements – written by the officer
First person – I went to… Explain abbreviations the first time they are used – Cumberland County Jail (CCJ) Proofread Your reports are how you build a reputation – good or bad

13 Report Wording Be careful in your wording Blood = red/brown stain
Jelly…

14 Court Preparation Presentation – honest, fair & competent
Study your reports prior to testimony Know the case in sequence – but be ready to deviate from it also Presentation – honest, fair & competent

15 Court Know your report & have 2 copies
Defense has a right to review what you are referring to Review any transcripts from previous testimony (hearings or Grand Jury)

16 Court Grand Jury Pretrial interviews with prosecutor
Specific questions Potential defense questions Make them aware of any mistakes Meetings with defense attorney Review of evidence Prosecutor must be aware Pay attention to what they pay attention to

17 Court Testimony Sequestration order in effect Know the courtroom
Dress appropriately – no uniforms allowed in Superior Court Refer to report if necessary – know if there are mistakes in that report Listen to the question then look at the jury – look at the back row and scan Multiple questions – “You’ve asked me several questions – which would you like me answer first?”

18 Court Be calm Think about how the jury is looking at you
You build a reputation with the judges and attorneys based on your testimony Don’t use police lingo – use simple, conversational English Answer what you’re asked – don’t volunteer anything else You are educating the jury

19 Court Be aware of demeanor and body language when completing direct examination and beginning cross examination Don’t become argumentative or confrontational when speaking with the defense attorney Listen to their questions carefully and clarify if necessary DO NOT take it personally – they are trying to knock you off balance

20 Court More than a “yes” or “no” required…
Correct mistakes – with the permission of the judge “To be honest with you…” If the judge talks or an objection is made – stop talking Overly friendly defense attorney = knife in the back Prepare…Present…Leave

21 Mandatory Reporting of Officer’s Use of Deadly Force
Use of physical force that causes death or serious bodily injury Use of physical force under circumstances that in fact create a substantial risk of causing death or serious bodily injury – even if they don’t result Use of physical force when it is the officers intent to cause death or serious bodily injury – whether or not either actually occur

22 Mandatory Reporting of Officer’s Use of Deadly Force
The discharge of a firearm in the general direction of another person or at a moving vehicle; whether or not the projectile hits the person or vehicle Less-lethal not necessary to report Pointing – even loaded & cocked – not necessary to report Ramming an occupied vehicle A roadblock set up to terminate a pursuit when a risk of causing death or serious bodily injury to the fleeing vehicle AND results in either

23 Use of Force in Defense of Premises
A Person In possession or control Or licensed or privileged Of a premise Includes land, private ways and any buildings thereon May use non-deadly force Necessary to prevent or terminate criminal trespass

24 Use of Force in Defense of Premises
A Person In possession or control Or licensed or privileged May use deadly force To prevent arson In defense of a person Within a dwelling place To prevent criminal trespass To prevent the commission of a crime Must demand the trespasser cease Unless doing so would be dangerous

25 Physical Force in Defense of a Person
A person may use a reasonable degree of non-deadly force To defend themselves or a third party from A reasonable belief of the imminent use of unlawful, non-deadly force Except: When the person provoked Unless the person withdrew and communicated that intent The force was a product of agreed combat

26 Physical Force in Defense of a Person
A person is justified in using deadly force upon another person When that person reasonably believes it necessary and reasonably believes such other person: Is about to use unlawful, deadly force against the person or a 3rd person Is (or is about to) commit kidnapping or robbery against the person or a 3rd person Has entered a dwelling place (without consent or authorization) and deadly force is necessary to prevent bodily injury upon the person or a 3rd person

27 Physical Force in Law Enforcement
A LEO is justified in using a reasonable degree of non-deadly force To affect an arrest or prevent escape (reasonable belief) In self-defense or defense of a 3rd person (reasonable belief) A LEO is justified in using deadly force only when the LEO reasonably believes it’s necessary Self-defense or defense of a 3rd person from the reasonable belief of the imminent use of unlawful deadly force

28 Non-deadly Force by LEO
Degree of non-deadly force must be reasonable Reasonable scene not in hindsight Officer must reasonably believe that non-deadly force is necessary to make an arrest or prevent escape If the officer knows the arrest or detention is illegal – NO force is justified

29 Physical Force in Law Enforcement
A LEO is justified in using deadly force only when the LEO reasonably believes it’s necessary To prevent the escape from arrest of a person Who’s committed a dangerous crime And who’s failure to apprehend is likely to result in more violence The LEO must make a reasonable attempt to warn The LEO reasonably believes the escapee knows the LEO is attempting to prevent the escape

30 Parker v. Gerrish (2008) Court upholds jury verdict of $111k for use of excessive force Parker stopped for OUI – overall compliant 3 officers on scene Tased after not immediately unclasping his wrist after one wrist was handcuffed Court decides based on: Seriousness of the offense Didn’t pose an immediate threat to officer safety Not actively resisting or attempting to flee

31 21 Foot Rule “How CLOSE is TOO CLOSE?”
March 1983 issue of SWAT Magazine Shooter and runner stand back to back Runner breaks free and runs away Upon sensing movement the shooter turns to shoot

32 21 Foot Rule 21 feet is a conservative distance
Assumes first shot is on target – not always the case Diagonal movement more effective Practice…practice…practice


Download ppt "Interview Interrogation Two way conversation Adversarial questioning"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google