Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Care Coordination for Heart Failure Patients
Karol E. Watson, MD, PhD, FACC Professor of Medicine/Cardiology Co-director, UCLA Program in Preventive Cardiology Director, UCLA Barbra Streisand Women’s Heart Health Program Los Angeles, CA
2
Disclosure Financial relationships with commercial interests listed below are not relevant to the CME activity: Dr. Watson serves as a consultant/speakers bureau member for Boehringer Ingleheim, and a consultant for Amgen
3
The burden of heart failure
21 MILLION adults worldwide are living with heart failure This number is expected to rise.1,2 ECONOMIC BURDEN In 2012, the overall worldwide cost of heart failure was nearly $108 BILLION.3 MORTALITY 50% of heart failure patients die within 5 years from diagnosis4 The burden of heart failure Just looking at these numbers suffices to convince about the burden of heart failure: 21 million adults are currently estimated to suffer from heart failure1,2 Most HF patients have 3 or more comorbidities3 Heart failure is the NUMBER 1 cause of hospitalization for patients aged >65 years4 50% of heart failure patients die within 5 years from diagnosis5 Heart failure did cost 108 billion US dollars in 2012 worldwide6 Mozaffarian D et al. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29-e322. Mosterd A et al. Heart. 2007;93(9): Cowie MR et al. Oxford PharmaGenesis; Accessed February 18, 2015. Fauci AS et al. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008. Cook C et al. Int J Cardiol. 2014;171(3): 1. Mozaffarian D et al. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29-e322. 2. Mosterd A et al. Heart. 2007;93(9): 3. Cook C et al. Int J Cardiol. 2014;171(3): 4. Fauci AS et al. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 17th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008.
4
Learning Objectives Discuss trends in heart failure readmissions and strategies to reduce re-hospitalizations Discuss evidence – based management of chronic Heart Failure and adverse drug events (ADE) associated with HF medications
5
Why are we talking about Readmissions?
6
1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries were rehospitalized within 30 days
Estimated cost to Medicare: $17.4 Billion (2004) Jencks et. al. NEJM, 2009
7
Affordable Care Act: Reducing Readmissions
3026: Community Based Care Transitions – 5-year Medicare pilot program available to hospitals identified by the HHS Secretary as having high readmission rates. Under the program, hospitals must engage in at least one evidence based care transition intervention (BOOST?) 3501: By Oct. 1, 2011, the Director of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality shall establish the Center for Quality Improvement and Safety, which will support the Director to “identify, develop, evaluate, disseminate, and provide training in innovative methodologies and strategies for quality improvement practices in the delivery of health care services that represent best practices (referred to as 'best practices') in health care quality, safety, and value 399KK: Quality Improvement Program for Hospitals with a High Severity Adjusted Readmissions 3025: Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. AHA opposes penalties against hospitals
8
Phillips et al. JAMA 2004;291:
9
Important elements for reducing readmissions
Assess risk of readmission based on accepted risk factors Risk Assessment High rate of readmissions due to ADEs, drug omissions, and poor adherence Controlling Medications Use teachback tools; clear patient instructions; empower patient to navigate healthcare system Patient Education/Self Management Anticipate needs; Clear home plan; Involve PCP and cardiologist Clear Care Plan, Follow up appointments made before hospital d/c; Clear plan to share relevant information Communication and Care Coordination
10
Risk Factors for Readmissions
11
Important elements for reducing readmissions
Assess risk of readmission based on accepted risk factors Risk Assessment High rate of readmissions due to ADEs, drug omissions, and poor adherence Controlling Medications Use teachback tools; clear patient instructions; empower patient to navigate healthcare system Patient Education/Self Management Anticipate needs; Clear home plan; Involve PCP and cardiologist Clear Care Plan, Follow up appointments made before hospital d/c; Clear plan to share relevant information Communication and Care Coordination
12
Controlling medications is essential
110 patients recently discharged from an academic medical center. Patients received a phone call from a pharmacist within 2 days of discharged and asked how they were feeling and if they understood all of their medications Pharmacists corrected any medication related problems Pharmacists communicated problems to the care team Am J Med 2001; 111 (9B) 26X
13
Controlling medications is essential
Patient satisfaction Control – 61% Intervention – 86% p=0.007 ED visits within 30 days Control – 24% Intervention – 10% p=0.005 Hospital Readmissions Control 25% Intervention 15% p = 0.07 A key finding was that 19% of patients had difficulty obtaining all of their discharge medications Am J Med 2001; 111 (9B) 26X
14
Important elements for reducing readmissions
Assess risk of readmission based on accepted risk factors Risk Assessment High rate of readmissions due to ADEs, drug omissions, and poor adherence Controlling Medications Use teachback tools; clear patient instructions; empower patient to navigate healthcare system Patient Education/Self Management Anticipate needs; Clear home plan; Involve PCP and cardiologist Clear Care Plan, Follow up appointments made before hospital d/c; Clear plan to share relevant information Communication and Care Coordination
15
All patients with Heart Failure should purchase a scale
16
Home Daily Weights The vascular bed can hold 10 pounds of fluid before it starts to seep out into the tissues 2 pounds = 1 quart of water extra in the circulation Usual recommendation: Report a 2-pound weight gain in 1 day or a 3-pound gain in 1 week
17
Heart Failure Teaching
Monitor Daily weights Same time Same place Same scale 2 lb. increase in 24 hours or 3 lb. increase in 1 week is significant Patients can be taught to adjust their diuretic dose / K+ based on changes in weight Dietary sodium restriction (2-3 gm/d) Routine fluid restriction is NOT necessary Don’t forget to address weight reduction 17
19
Important elements for reducing readmissions
Risk Assessment Assess risk of readmission based on accepted risk factors High rate of readmissions due to ADEs, drug omissions, and poor adherence Controlling Medications Use teachback tools; clear patient instructions; empower patient to navigate healthcare system Patient Education/Self Management Anticipate needs; Clear home plan; Involve PCP and cardiologist Clear Care Plan Follow up appointments made before hospital d/c; Clear plan to share relevant information Communication and Care Coordination
20
Follow-up by Physician Type
GWTG HF Follow up after Hospital Admissions Follow-up by Physician Type Hernandez et al. JAMA , May 5, 2010 – Vol. 303, No. 17
21
GWTG HF Follow up after Hospital Admissions
4.7% of patients died in the 30 days after discharge 30-day mortality was significantly lower among patients admitted to hospitals which had a high rate of early follow-up with a cardiologist Hernandez et al. JAMA , May 5, 2010 – Vol. 303, No. 17
22
Important elements for reducing readmissions
Risk Assessment Assess risk of readmission based on accepted risk factors High rate of readmissions due to ADEs, drug omissions, and poor adherence Controlling Medications Use teachback tools; clear patient instructions; empower patient to navigate healthcare system Patient Education/Self Management Anticipate needs; Clear home plan; Involve PCP and cardiologist Clear Care Plan, Follow up appointments made before hospital d/c; Clear plan to share relevant information Communication and Care Coordination
23
Preventing HF Readmissions: a team effort
Patient Cardiologist Primary Care Provider Heart Failure Nurse Pharmacist Family Others?
24
As HF readmissions are reduced, HF care must remain optimal
JACC Volume 70, Issue 15, October 2017
25
Learning Objectives Discuss trends in heart failure readmissions and strategies to reduce re-hospitalizations Discuss evidence – based management of chronic Heart Failure and adverse drug events (ADE) associated with HF medications
26
Heart Failure (HFrEF) Management
Medications used in virtually all HFrEF patients diuretics (most patients will need) ß blockers ACE inhibitors / ARBs or sacubitril/valsartan Medications used in select HFrEF patients Aldosterone antagonists Hydralazine / Isosorbide Digoxin Ivabradine
27
Diuretics Accepted Clinical Benefit: Diuretics relieve symptoms of dyspnea and edema BUT No good randomized trials Activate RAAS and SNS Electrolyte abnormalities Over diuresis can lead to Renal Failure High Doses correlate with poorer prognosis Aim for minimum effective dose to control symptoms
28
3 key Neurohumoral systems affect HF
SNS RAAS Vasoconstriction Blood pressure Sympathetic tone Aldosterone Hypertrophy Fibrosis RAAS activity Vasopressin Heart rate Contractility β-blockers Natriuretic peptide system Vasodilation Natriuresis/diuresis An imbalance occurs in three key neurohumoral systems Overactivation of the RAAS and SNS is detrimental in HFrEF and underpins the basis of therapy. Activation of the natriuretic peptide system is protective, which can counterbalance the adverse effects due to overactivation of the other two systems. 1. McMurray et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;33:1787–847; Figure references: Levin et al. N Engl J Med 1998;339:321–8; Nathisuwan & Talbert. Pharmacotherapy 2002;22:27–42; Kemp & Conte. Cardiovascular Pathology 2012;365–371; Schrier & Abraham N Engl J Med 1999;341:577–85 Abbreviations ACEI=angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; Ang=angiotensin; ARB=angiotensin receptor blocker; AT1 = angiotensin II type 1; HF=heart failure; HFrEF=heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; MRA=mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NEP=neprilysin; NPs=natriuretic peptides; NPRs=natriuretic peptide receptors; RAAS=renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; SNS=sympathetic nervous system Figure references: Levin et al. N Engl J Med 1998;339:321–8; Nathisuwan & Talbert. Pharmacotherapy 2002;22:27–42 Kemp & Conte. Cardiovascular Pathology 2012;365–71 Schrier & Abraham. N Engl J Med 1999;341:577–85
29
-Blockers Over 10,000 patients evaluated in long-term placebo-controlled clinical trials (carvedilol, bisoprolol, metoprolol) Decrease in all-cause mortality by 30%-35% (P<.0001) Decrease in combined risk of death and hospitalization by 35%-40% (P<.001); effect shown in 6 individual trials Effect shown in patients already receiving ACE-I
30
ß Blockers Generic Name Trade Name Initial Daily Dose Target Dose Mean Dose in Clinical Trials Bisoprolol Zebeta 1.25 mg qd 10 mg qd 8.6 mg/day Carvedilol Coreg 3.125 mg bid 25 mg bid 37 mg/day Coreg CR 80 mg qd Metoprolol CR/XL Toprol XL mg qd 200 mg qd 159 mg/day Contra-indications: severe, brittle reactive airways disease Cautions: current or recent HF exacerbations; heart block Troublesome interactions: other rate reducing medications
31
Even low doses of B-blockade can have a dramatic effect
Ejection Fraction* ‡ 8 P<.001 † 6 † LVEF (EF units) 4 2 The MOCHA trial in mild to moderate HF showed that clinical benefits with carvedilol begin at 6.25 mg bid.1 As this slide depicts, EF increased incrementally as the dose of carvedilol was increased. Placebo 6.25 mg bid 12.5 mg bid 25 mg bid Carvedilol Patients receiving diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ± digoxin; follow-up 6 months; placebo (n=84), carvedilol (n=261). *Results from the Multicenter Oral Carvedilol Heart Failure Assessment (MOCHA) trial (n=345). †P.005 vs placebo. ‡P.0001 vs placebo. Adapted from Bristow MR et al. Circulation. 1996;94:2807–2816. 1Bristow MR et al. Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investigators. Circulation. 1996;94:
32
ACE Inhibitors ~ 7000 patients evaluated in controlled clinical trials
Improvement in cardiac function, symptoms, and clinical status; equivocal effects on exercise tolerance Decrease in all-cause mortality by 20%-25% (P<.001) and decrease in combined risk of death and hospitalization by 30%-35% (P<.001) Garg and Yusuf, JAMA May 10;273(18):
33
ACE Inhibitor Adverse Effects
Hypotension Renal Insufficiency Hyperkalemia Cough (20 %) Angioedema With captopril especially: neutropenia, nephrotic syndrome, skin rash, taste disturbances (SH group- related) pregnancy risk category C (D in second and third trimesters)
34
Classification of Drug Risks in Pregnancy
Controlled studies show no risk or adequate, well-controlled studies have failed to show risk. B Animal findings show risk but human findings do not, or animal findings are negative with no human studies done. C Risk cannot be ruled out. Human studies are lacking. Animal studies show risk or are lacking as well. D Evidence of risk. Investigational or post-marketing data shows risk to fetus. However, benefits may outweigh risk. X Contraindicated in pregnancy. Studies have shown fetal risks which clearly outweigh any possible benefit to the patient.
35
ACE Inhibitor Drug : Drug Interactions
Digoxin: may increase digoxin level by 15% to 30%. Iithium :increase lithium levels and symptoms of toxicity possible (monitor). Potassium sparing diuretics , K supplements may cause hyperkalemia .(monitor pts closely). Drug-food: salt substitutes containing K : increase K level .
36
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)
Recommendations ARBs are recommended in patients with HF and reduced LVEF who are ACEI intolerant DO NOT USE ACE-I and ARBs TOGETHER ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult
37
ARB Adverse effects Drugs in this class are usually tolerated. Advantage over ACEIs is the low incidence of cough. Angioedema is also rare. Headach. Fatigue. Hyperkalemia. pregnancy risk category C (D in second and thrid trimesters) Cough is improved by switching ACE inhibitor to ARB
38
ARB Drug : Drug Interactions
Drug-drug: K sparing diuretics , K supplements may cause hyperkalemia .(monitor pts closely). Drug-food: salt substitutes containing K : increase K level . DO NOT USE ACE-I and ARBs TOGETHER
39
Background: Neprilysin Inhibition (NI)
Natriuretic peptide system Renin-angiotensin system Natriuretic Peptides Sacubitril X ACE-I ARB X Neprilysin Angiotensin I Inactive Fragments Angiotensin II Vasodilation Natriuresis/diuresis Vasoconstriction Adapted from Bonow RO, et al. Global Cardiology Science and Practice. 2014; 34: dx.doi.org/ /gcsp
40
Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition (ARNI)
Sacubitril: Prodrug that inhibits neprilysin leading to increased levels of natriuretic peptides Valsartan: Direct antagonism of angiotensin II receptors inducing vasoconstriction through aldosterone, catecholamine, arginine vasopressin release
41
Sacubitril/Valsartan (ARNI)
Tablet comes in 3 doses 24mg/26mg 49mg/51mg 97mg/103mg Indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) (NYHA class II-IV) and reduced ejection fraction Recommended starting dose: 49 mg/51 mg BID Target dose: 97 mg/103 mg BID
42
ARNI Precautions Side Effects Hypotension Hyperkalemia Increase serum creatinine Angioedema Cough Contraindications History of angioedema with previous ACE or ARB therapy Use of ACE inhibitors within 36 hours of dose Use with aliskirin Pregnancy allow a 36 hour washout period when switching from or to an ACE inhibitor
43
Reducing Heart Failure Readmission
Readmission of patients with heart failure is common and costly. Reducing HF Readmissions Is a national priority Reducing Readmissions Requires a team approach Hospitals that fail to reduce Readmissions will be penalized Reducing Readmission is just good medicine
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.