1. 2009/10: Performance of the EPWP Incentive Grant
Standing Committee on Appropriations
18 May 2010 1

2. Introduction and General Observation
This submission is made in terms of Section 3(2)(b)(ii) of the Financial and Fiscal Commission Act 99 of 1997 as amended
The Commission welcomes attempts aimed at addressing employment through Government expenditure programmes
The Commission has in the past recommended that government should avoid using conditional grants to fund what can be funded through the equitable share
Conditional grants come with either positive or negative incentives
The negative incentives may discourage provinces and municipalities from funding job creation initiatives in the hope that these will be funded through the conditional grants (substitution effects)
The management of the EPWP Incentive grant requires significant capacity of the DPW to monitor and evaluate the performance of the program
There is a need for constant availability of data disaggregated at municipal level on the performance of this grant

3. Fiscal Incentives to Provinces and Municipalities
Provinces and municipalities spend their budgets on EPWP projects, thereafter the grant is paid by DPW quarterly, after employment opportunities have been created
There is no guarantee that provinces and municipalities will be reimbursed what they have spent as the formula to divide the grant is not specific and neither is it transparent
Reference is made to allocation criteria but these are not specified to allow for independent assessment
The Commission has in the past requested information on this matter (see FFC Submission on the 2009 DoR Bill) but this never materialised
Expenditure on this grant has been haphazard across provinces
Expenditure reports on the grant performance at local government level could not be ascertained by the Commission on request
Reports by both the National Treasury and DPW on EPWP achievability do not tally

4. EPWP Incentive Grant to Provinces as at 31 December 2009 (NT PFMA S
EPWP Incentive Grant to Provinces as at 31 December 2009 (NT PFMA S.32 Report)

5. EPWP Incentive Grant to Provinces as at 31 February 2010 (NT PFMA S
EPWP Incentive Grant to Provinces as at 31 February 2010 (NT PFMA S.32 Report)

6. EPWP Milestones as at 31 December 2009 (DPW: EPWP Quarterly Report)

7. Challenges with the administration of the grant
The challenge with this grant has been the late disbursement of funds to provinces and municipalities outside the ambits of DoRA
Actual allocations were not finalised when provincial and municipal budgets were appropriated in the legislatures and councils
Planning and implementation of the grant seems not to be done consistently thus the inconsistencies in the data on budgets and outputs between National Treasury and Department of Public Works
More clarity on service level requirements for the grant is required from DPW

8. Grant Design Issues
Is the EPWP Incentive Grant a stand alone or a supplementary grant?
What is the relationship of the grant to MIG, IGP, Rural Household Infrastructure Grant and other infrastructure related grants?
How are EPWP job opportunities created through these grants correlated with this grant?
Planning for the grant ahead of the MTEF Allocations
Targets, Projects and Outputs
Service agreements with provincial and local governments prior to MTEF allocations
Allocations linked to incentives and deliverables