Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presented To: 3rd Annual CMMI Technology Conference and User Group

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Presented To: 3rd Annual CMMI Technology Conference and User Group"— Presentation transcript:

1 Presented To: 3rd Annual CMMI Technology Conference and User Group
Impacts of the CMMI November 19, 2003

2 Objective Contribute to the body of knowledge on the impacts of the CMMI Focus on ways to quantify Process baseline Progress Explore traditional and non-traditional measures How to know what state you were in when you started the PI effort?

3 Agenda Breadth of projects covered
A baseline for pre-CMMI process behavior Training feedback Current project monitoring and control measures data Qualitative Impacts

4 Breadth of Projects Covered
Less Systems Engineering Fewer technical skills Less complex More Systems Engineering More technical skills required More complex Government Budget Software Document Management Projects (some were a combination of these types): Proposal project Document scanning and document query and retrieval interface development Financial management software development Network support/OS and network software upgrades/Help Desk Requirements elicitation and analysis consulting/training Project size from 3 staff to 35 Proposal Development Technology Infrastructure System Management

5 Establishing a Baseline for Process Implementation
Audits Lessons Learned Ineffective processes impact Preliminary results, no statistical significance Audit of projects whose period of performance began prior to implementation of the CMMI standard processes and were not involved in the appraisal All major process areas addressed (exceptions were SAM and DAR) In most cases too few data points for statistical significance.

6 Pre-CMMI Process Baseline
Projects already functioning at 33% average compliance Projects 67% non-compliant Projects already functioning at 33% average compliance with the standard processes before they were fully defined (source for best practices for process action teams) On average, projects were not in compliance with 67% of the (to-be) defined processes

7 Pre-CMMI Audit Results
Ordered by least to most compliant Requirements Management Configuration Management Quality Assurance Design, Development and Test Project Management

8 Lessons Learned Objectives Questionnaire and meeting
Process effectiveness Impact of ineffective processes Questionnaire and meeting Cross walk to CMS Defined Process ETVXs Objective: Process effectiveness (not addressed by SCAMPI appraisal) Format: Questionnaire and meeting Questions on: Awareness of standard processes What went right What went wrong What to do differently Separate PM question on effectiveness impact

9 Lessons Learned Results
Shows proportion of comments that addressed each category. X axis reflects cross-walk to CMS defined processes

10 LL Process Ineffectiveness Impact
50% of any cost overrun 25% - 50% of any schedule overrun Estimate is that up to 50% of any cost overrun was due to ineffective process Estimate is that 25%-50% of any schedule overrun was due to ineffective process

11 During CMMI Effort Compliance tracked every two weeks
Sample set = each project type Projects: Proposal project Network support/OS and network software upgrades/Help Desk Financial management software development Requirements elicitation and analysis consulting/training Document scanning and document query and retrieval interface development Place in life cycle impacts engineering products and PMC for those phases more than any other set of work products Work products reflect CMS standard process

12 Progress during PI Effort
Many work products assessed for each process area; not the same number in each process area. M = Month Some early results reflect delay in getting work products to the EPG. Engineering and monitoring tied to life cycle phase and some projects were not far enough along their life cycle to have work products. Support in this definition was confined to DA and a specific DA task or N/A was defined for each project.

13 Training Questionnaire
13 questions Example of results for: Perceived value of training to Managers Time spent on training Value of company-sponsored training Questions for managers on: Value of training Customer support for training Management self-ratings on process strengths and weaknesses

14

15 Post-CMMI Results CMMI Class A SCAMPI Appraisal results
Audits and lessons learned Audits and lessons learned will provide more data on status over time

16 Current PMC Measures EPG Project Process Change Requests Risks
Resource allocations by phase for a month Resource allocations over time Overtime or ‘grief’ index These are examples of current PMC measures

17 PCRs and Risks No distinction made between major and minor PCRs
This is one of the measures reported monthly to the ESC.

18 Project Measures

19 Selected Phase Measures Roll-Up

20 Grief Index This one for fun and to show how creative one can be with data.

21 Results Ineffective processes contribute to cost and schedule overruns
Lack of planning affects other process areas Process training is highly valued Need to plan for QA, CM, Risk, Measures, etc. If not, result is lower ability to execute in those areas throughout the life cycle.

22 Results of Data Analysis
Require additional 25% of staff training by EOY Planning sets the stage Initiate tasks and resource tracking on support organizations Focus training on project planning Although other processes were deficient in the audit results, the foundation for them is laid in planning which analysis confirmed. New hires and new projects can be expected to show similar soft spots

23 Qualitative Impacts Potential increase in revenues and profits: 50%
External perception of CMS project management capabilities increased by a factor of 3 Risk Management- insight from audits improves ability to track risk status 3rd bullet: Can tell from audits if the right staff are going to the courses, if there is use of process work products, if there is support from senior management for status reports, risk tracking, etc.

24 Qualitative Impacts Less sense of the CMMI as ‘bolted on’
True institutionalization of CMMI compliant processes as ‘the way we do business’ Increase in use of best practices across the organization

25 Questions?

26 Contact Information Office: Fax:

27 List of Acronyms AI – Action Item CM – Configuration Management
CMMI – Capability Maturity Model Integration DAR – Decision Analysis and Resolution DD&T – Design, Development and Test EPG – Engineering Process Group PCR – Process Change Request

28 List of Acronyms PMC – Project Monitoring and Control
PP – Project Planning QA – Quality Assurance ROI – Return on Investment RM – Requirements Management TS – Technical Solution


Download ppt "Presented To: 3rd Annual CMMI Technology Conference and User Group"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google