Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Chapter 1 Economic Models.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Chapter 1 Economic Models."— Presentation transcript:

1 Chapter 1 Economic Models

2 Outline of Microeconomics
Microeconomics: The Allocation of Scarce Resources Models Uses of Microeconomic Models

3 Microeconomics: The Allocation of Scarce Resources
Scarcity implies trade-offs Resources (workers, raw materials, capital, and energy) are available in limited supply. Which goods and services should be produced? How should we produce those goods and services? Who gets to consume those goods and services? Decision-makers Individuals (consumers) Firms Government

4 The Themes of Microeconomics
Trade-Offs CONSUMERS Consumers have limited incomes, which can be spent on a wide variety of goods and services, or saved for the future. WORKERS Workers also face constraints and make trade-offs. People must decide whether and when to enter the workforce. Workers face trade-offs in their choice of employment. Workers must sometimes decide how many hours per week they wish to work, thereby trading off labor for leisure. FIRMS Firms also face limits in terms of the kinds of products that they can produce, and the resources available to produce them.

5 Microeconomics: The Allocation of Scarce Resources
Prices determine resource allocation Which goods? How to produce? Who gets them? Prices answer these important questions by influencing decision-makers. Markets A market is where interactions between consumers, firms, and the government occur. Prices of goods and services are determined in a market.

6 Microeconomic Models Economists use models to describe economic activities A model is a description of the relationship between two or more economic variables. Understanding this relationship allows economists to predict how a change in one variable will affect another variable. Economic models: have assumptions that simplify things relative to the real world make theoretical predictions that we can test empirically involve maximizing something (e.g. consumer satisfaction, firm profits) subject to resource constraints

7 Uses of Microeconomic Models
Predicting individual decisions Does it pay financially to go to college? Should a homeowner purchase a insurance? Predicting firm decisions Should a movie theater charge lower prices for matinee show? Should Coca-Cola advertise more if Pepsi does? How does a mining company’s extraction decision depend on interest rates? Predicting government decisions What is the impact of a new tax on tax revenues raised? How can pollution taxes reduce global warming?

8 Features of Economic Models
Ceteris Paribus assumption Optimization assumption Distinction between positive and normative analysis

9 Ceteris Paribus Assumption
Ceteris Paribus means “other things the same” Economic models explain simple relationships focus on only a few forces at a time other variables are assumed to be unchanged

10 Optimization Assumptions
Many models assume that economic actors are rationally pursuing some goal consumers seek to maximize utility firms seek to maximize profits (or minimize costs) government regulators seek to maximize public welfare

11 Positive-Normative Distinction
Positive economic theories seek to explain the economic phenomena that are observed The truth of a positive statement can be tested. Normative economic theories focus on what “should” be A normative statement contains a value judgment that can’t be tested.

12 Disagreement: Normative versus Positive
Economists sometimes disagree about assumptions and models and also about what policy to use. Some disagreements can be settled by appealing to further facts, but others cannot. Disagreements that can’t be settled by facts are normative statements — statements about what ought to be. Disagreements that can be settled by facts are positive statements—statements about what is. Students sometimes have difficulty sorting out economic facts from economic opinions. One way to cure this problem is to have them cut out articles from a newspaper (possibly The Wall Street Journal, or the New York Times) or copy sections of articles from reliable sources from the Internet. Ask the students to label the headlines as either positive or normative economic statements. Tell them to distinguish the headlines is by asking whether a statement is testable. If it can’t be tested, then it’s normative (a value judgment). Explain that some of the common buzzwords that are tip-offs to a normative statement are: should, must, or ought. The value of models. Help the students to appreciate the power of models as tools for understanding reality. The analogy of a model as a map is easy and convincing. Jim Peach, a fine economics teacher at the University of New Mexico, gets his students to make paper airplanes on the first day of class. After flying their paper planes around the classroom (and picking up the debris!) he gets them to talk about what they can learn about real airplanes from experimenting with paper (and other model) planes.

13 Competitive versus Noncompetitive Markets
● Perfectly competitive market Market with many buyers and sellers, so that no single buyer or seller has a significant impact on price. Other markets containing a small number of producers Finally, some markets contain many producers but are noncompetitive; that is, individual firms can jointly affect the price.

14 Market Price ● Market price Price prevailing in a competitive market.
In markets that are not perfectly competitive, different firms might charge different prices for the same product. This might happen because one firm is Trying to win customers from its competitors, Customers have brand loyalties that allow some firms to charge higher prices than others. The market prices of most goods will fluctuate over time, and for many goods the fluctuations can be rapid.

15 The Economic Theory of Value
The founding of modern economics The Wealth of Nations is considered the beginning of modern economics Distinction between value and price Value meant “value in use” Price meant “value in exchange”

16 The Economic Theory of Value
Labor theory of exchange value the exchange values of goods are determined by the costs of producing them primarily affected by labor costs diamond-water paradox producing diamonds requires more labor than producing water

17 The Economic Theory of Value
The marginalist revolution the exchange value of an item is determined by the usefulness of the last unit consumed since water is plentiful, consuming an additional unit has a relatively low value

18 The Economic Theory of Value
Marshallian supply-demand synthesis supply and demand simultaneously operate to determine price prices reflect both the marginal valuation that consumers place on goods and the marginal costs of producing the goods

19 The Economic Theory of Value
Water low marginal value low marginal cost of production low price Diamonds high marginal value a high marginal cost of production high price

20 Supply-Demand Equilibrium
The supply curve has a positive slope because marginal cost rises as quantity increases Price Equilibrium QD = Qs D The demand curve has a negative slope because the marginal value falls as quantity increases P* Q* Quantity per period

21 Supply-Demand Equilibrium
What happens to the equilibrium price if either demand or supply shift? A shift in demand will lead to a new equilibrium

22 Supply-Demand Equilibrium
An increase in demand... Price D’ S …leads to a rise in the equilibrium price and quantity. 7 750 5 D Quantity per period 500

23 The Economic Theory of Value
General equilibrium models the Marshallian model is a partial equilibrium model focuses only on one market at a time for more general questions, we need a model of the entire economy must include the interrelationships between markets and economic agents

24 The Economic Theory of Value
Production possibilities frontier can be used as a basic building block for general equilibrium models shows the combinations of two outputs that can be produced with an economy’s resources

25 A Production Possibility Frontier
Quantity of food (per week) Opportunity cost of clothing = 1/2 pound of food 10 9.5 Opportunity cost of clothing = 2 pounds of food 4 2 Quantity of clothing (per week) 3 4 12 13

26 A Production Possibility Frontier
Resources are scarce Scarcity  we must make choices each choice has opportunity costs opportunity costs depend on how much of each good is produced

27 Production Possibility Frontier and Economic Efficiency
Suppose that an economy produces 2 goods: x and y, Labor is the only input. The production function for good x and y can be written: Total labor available is constrained by lx + ly < 200 Construction of the PPF in this economy is:

28 Opportunity Cost Suppose that the production possibility frontier can be represented by Assume that the economy is on the frontier, the opportunity cost of y in terms of good x can be derived by solving for y as Solve for Y to find the slope If we differentiate, we get

29 Concavity of A PPF Suppose that labor is equally divided between x and y, the number of units of When x = 10, y = 20, dy/dx = -4(10)/20 = -2 Suppose labor is allocated as 144 and 56, then outputs are When x = 12, y  15, dy/dx = -4(12)/15 = -3.2 The slope rises as x rises

30 Inefficiency Now the PPF becomes: X Y2 = 180, x = 10, then y output is now y = 17.9. The loss of output 2.1 units of y is a measure of the labor market being inefficient. Again, if equal allocation of labor is being done, then we would have, x= 9.5 and y = 19.


Download ppt "Chapter 1 Economic Models."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google