Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJasper Bell Modified over 7 years ago
1
Incarcerated Women and Reproductive Health: A Survey of Contraception Services in Correctional Health Facilities Carolyn B. Sufrin, MD, MA Judy C. Chang, MD, MPH; Mitchell D. Creinin, MD University of Pittsburgh APHA Annual Meeting 2007 Women Prisoners: Dignity, Advocacy, and Health November 06, 2007
2
Background 3.2 million women arrested annually Median age 32
Relevance of reproductive health care 7% of inmates in 2005 were women These are women of repro age for whom contraception is impconjugal visits, rape, pre-release. The moment of release from jail or prison is a transitional one. For many women, an unplanned pregnancy might interfere with this process and disempower them as they reconstitute their lives. Because women represent small minority of prison population, their specific health needs have often been ignored. Prison as a source of control/power History of forced sterilization/eugenics on prisoners Potential for reform and window of opportunity for health care of people who are typically marginalized (stats on prisoners) and without insurance. Great window for contraception, esp as women are about to be released. Disparities in rates of unintendedness of pregnancy and contracetpion use; when control for access to care, this disparity exist, and those who are in jail mirror those disparities. 6% of women entering prison are pregnant 4.4% in PA Mostly non-violent crimes (71.8%) These women are of reproductive age and thus have particular health concerns/needs that pertain to them. 70% of incarcerated women have a child at home younger than 18. Greenfeld L, Snell T. Women Offenders. US DOJ 1999:1-14.
3
Background Unique public health opportunity
Population w/ limited health care access Pre-release health care Minimal attention to gender-specific health needs Eighth amendment- against cruel and unusual punishment has been interpreted to guarantee their health care
4
Background National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC)
Some guidelines, few requirements Prenatal care vs. contraception Guidelines do exist and in order to become accredited, a facility has to meet 100% of essential clinical standard services. Prenatal care is one of those essential services, but contraception counseling is not. Despite this accreditation, guidelines are loosely interpreted. Comprehensive services for women’s unique health problems should be provided Counseling on parenting STI screening ‘should receive a pregnancy test on admission’ Mental health, substance abuse No mention of contraception!!! Standards: suggest inquiry into current gyn problems, pregnancy for females and adolescents; recommends pelvic exam and pap smears, but not mandated except in prisons. Comprehensive counseling given to pregnant inmates in keeping with their desires in planning children or abortion or adoption. Theyu should implement intake procedures that include histories on menstruation, pregnancy, gyn problems. Comprehensive services for women’s unique health problems should be provided: Pap and MMX as indicated by ACOG; consider high levels of DV/victimization; parenting sisues; high rates of substance abuse and depression. Intake should include breast exam, pap smear, MMX if indicated. STI screening should be provided. Females should receive a pregnancy test on admission.
5
Background 27% of sexually active women using contraception upon incarceration1 67% likely to be sexually active upon release1 Women more likely to initiate contraception if accessible in facility (OR=14.6) 2 27% of women are using a consistent form of birth control in 3 months prior to incarceration. The remainder either inconsistently use birth control or use none 1)Clarke JG, et al Am J Public Health 2006;96(5):834-9 2)Clarke JG, et al Am J Public Health 2006;96(5):840-5
6
Objective To describe current contraceptive services provided to female inmates in the US Hypothesis: Contraception services are not fully addressed in correctional facilities
7
Methods Cross-sectional survey Correctional health providers
Self-administered Written Mailed
8
Survey design 29 questions Pretesting: Demographics
Screening practices Birth control methods (BCM) Abortion Open-ended (3) Pretesting: Piloted to 10 physicians & 5 nurses in correctional health Questions were designed to measure key behaviors and variables. Pretesting was done with 10 physicians and 5 nurses in corr health. Comments were then incorporated and revisions made accordingly.
9
Sampling Inclusion: Exclusion:
Members of Academy of Correctional Health Providers (ACHP) Exclusion: Dentists, detention officers and wardens, pharmacists, attorneys, administrators
10
Data analysis Descriptive statistics Chi-squared test
Multivariate logistic regression Qualitative extraction of key themes Measures of association were performed using bivariate analysis via chi squared test. Open ended questions were interpreted to extract key themes
11
Response Response rate 44% 286 Surveys analyzed Mailing #1 950
Ineligible 61 Surveys returned 219 No response 664 Mailing #2 664 Male only 29 Surveys analyzed 190 Ineligible 33 Surveys Returned 156 No response 469 Overall response: 391 (45%) 104/391 responses excluded 89 male facilities 15 non-clinical 287 (72%) for analysis Response rate 44% 286 Surveys analyzed Surveys analyzed 96 Male only 60
12
Demographics Age 45 (29-75) Gender Female Male 73% 27% AA White 8% 85%
Race/Ethnicity AA White 8% 85% Hispanic 5% Training RN MD/DO NP 57% 22% 11% Type of facility Jail State Federal Juvenile 64% 22% 1% 9% Time in practice 5-10 yrs >10 yrs 19% 65% Certified Corr. health (CH) 68% No statistically significant differences between males and females and other demographics other than profession: 66% of the doctors were male, and 34% of doctors were female. Similarly, 80% of the women were NP or RN, as opposed to 36% of the men having a nursing degree.
13
BCM assessment 71% ask about BCM at some point
44% at intake only 1% release only 8% intake and release 20% some other time 55% do not allow inmates to continue BCM What’s striking is that although 71% ask about contraception at some point, very few providers do so immediately before release Most providers who permit women to continue BCM do so for ‘medical reason’ 20-40% routine screening for STIs
14
BCM counseling Formal policy on contraception counseling = 30%
Provision of counseling = 70% 19% on intake 11% immediately prior to release 40% upon request only Remainder of counseling occurs when requested (65% when requested) or at other points during incarceration
15
Methods of contraception
38% provide BCM % Very few provide counseling/provision of other hormonal methods Provision of OCPs (either/both)=34% Provision condoms =10% Provision Depo (either/both)=25% Patch counseling: 40% Ring counseling: 35% Depo Counseling: 49% IUD counseling: 33% Tubal counseling 36% Condoms counseling: 59% Abstinence counseling=53%
16
BCM Counseling & Provision Bivariate Analysis
(%) p Provide Jail 179 64 177 31 State Prison 60 82 52 Fed prison 3 33 2 Juvenile 25 96 24 63 Female 204 73 .036 41 NS Male 75 74 30 Continue BCM 125 76 124 57 <.001 BCM counseling -- 194 45 .001 Practice>10yrs 181 71 44 .039 Ab. Not allowed 88 61 .041 89 19 Democrat 113 112 53 Republican 69 67 26 .007 .001 These data show that the type of facility correlates to whether or not providers counsel women on birth control. Female gender also does. NS: type of provider, age, certified in correctional health NS <.001
17
BCM Counseling and Provision: Screening practices
Test Screen & BCM Counsel (%) No screen & BCM Counsel (%) p Screen & BCM Provided (%) No Screen & BCM Provided (%) GC 73 39 .001 40 22 NS CT 44 .003 24 HIV 93 54 .052 19 .043 RPR 95 32 <.001 17 .016 Hep B 87 45 41 25 .026 Hep C 76 48 42 20 Pap 77 33 15 PPD 71 .033 *This slide shows that there is a strong correlation between screening practices and counseling on contraception Providers who screen for STIs, cervical cancer and TB are more likely to counsel on BCM than those who don’t screen, but no more likely to provide. Only 3.5% do not do a PPD. Otherwise, most screening tests are done by 90% of providers, either routine or by request. Pap is not done by 24%. Totals who are screened: GC (254) CT (251) HIV (251) RPR (246) Hep B (218) Hep C (219) Pap (209) PPD (269) Totals who are not screened: No screen (23) (25) (26) (28) (55) (54) (67) (10)
18
Counseling BCM: multivariate analysis
OR p 95% CI Ask about BCM 1.8 .001 Desire BCM education materials 3.0 .013 Syphilis screening 16.5 3.1-90 In multivariate logistic regression, facility and gender are no longer significantly associated with counseling. However, people who ask women about contraception are more likely to counsel them on it. Those who are interested in additional educational materials are also more likely to counsel women. Additionally, syphillis screening was also associated with counseling.
19
Provision BCM: multivariate analysis
OR p 95% CI Ask about BCM 1.1 .046 Allowed to continue BCM 5.4 <.001 Abortion allowed 2.6 .018 Pap screening 4.2 .017 In multivariate logistic regression, facility and gender are no longer significantly associated with counseling. However, people who ask women about contraception are more likely to counsel them on it. Those who are interested in additional educational materials are also more likely to counsel women. Additionally, syphillis screening was also associated with counseling.
20
Text responses: themes
Continue BCM for ‘medical reasons’ Perceive that women not interested Facilities not interested Competing priorities Transient populations, high turnover Not enough time or staff Not enough money Some people gave suggestions for getting around things or felt it was important: “We can reach this audience while they’re incarcerated” “We need a class prior to release regarding contraception” “we also post signs advising the women to start on birth control two months prior to release”
21
Limitations Selection Bias Self-reporting bias
Convenience sampling Non-responses Self-reporting bias Not trackable to facility to verify actual practices Not powered to show SS differences Not prospective so not designed to have power to detect differences ie b/t state and county Eliminated people who listed ‘mental health as their interest/specialty area I didn’t ask about religion Questions don’t address men
22
Conclusions Contraception is addressed, but is inconsistently counseled and prescribed. Minimal counseling & provision occur pre-release. Providers who ask about BCM and screen for STIs are more likely to counsel incarcerated women on BCM. Providers who counsel women on BCM and who report that women can continue BCM or obtain an abortion are more likely to provide women w/ BCM. People who are more committed to preventitive reproductive health concerns are more likely to counsel women on BCM There are no formal policies which presents a loophole for people to introduce a policy. In our current political climate, the fact that no formal national or local policy exists presents an opening for a political rather than a public-health. minded policy to be created. As an example, I was not surprised that abstinence was commonly counseled
23
Future Directions Inmates’ perspectives Program development
Ethnography Program development Cost analysis
24
Incarcerated Women and Reproductive Health: A Survey of Contraception Services in Correctional Health Facilities Carolyn B. Sufrin, MD, MA Judy C. Chang, MD, MPH; Mitchell D. Creinin, MD University of Pittsburgh *supported by the Irene McLenahan Young Investigator Research Fund Award from the Magee-Womens Health Foundation*
25
Extras. . .
27
Abortion permitted: Bivariate
(%) p Jail 179 66 State Prison 59 73 Fed prison 2 50 Juvenile 24 75 Female 202 69 .519 Male 74 62 Continue BCM 90 .077 BCM counseling 191 71 .176 .853 NS: Years in practice, profession, certified in corr. Health
28
n=88 n=116 n=69 p Abortion allowed 49% 79% 72% <.001 Arrange appt 40% 63% 50% .040 Provide transport 96% 87% .010
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.