Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials"— Presentation transcript:

1 Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
Dynamics of the family of complex maps with: Paul Blanchard Toni Garijo Matt Holzer Dan Look Sebastian Marotta Mark Morabito Monica Moreno Rocha Kevin Pilgrim Elizabeth Russell Yakov Shapiro David Uminsky Sum Wun Ellce

2 Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
1. The Escape Trichotomy Cantor set Sierpinski curve Cantor set of circles

3 Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
2. Structures in the dynamical plane All are Sierpinski curve Julia sets

4 Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
3. Structures in the parameter planes

5 These lectures will deal with the dynamics
of the family of complex maps where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Multibrot set

6 These lectures will deal with the dynamics
of the family of complex maps where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Multibrot set But for simplicity, we’ll concentrate for the most part on the easier family

7 Why the interest in these maps?

8 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of

9 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of When but when , the dynamical behavior “explodes.” we completely understand the dynamics of

10 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ?

11 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!):

12 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!): Iterate:

13 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!): Iterate: a singular perturbation of z/2

14 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!): Whenever the equation has a multiple root, the corresponding Newton’s method involves a singular perturbation.

15 Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? Third, we are looking at maps on the boundary of the set of rational maps of degree 2n a very interesting topic of contemporary research.

16 Dynamics of the family of complex maps
The Escape Trichotomy Dynamics of the family of complex maps with: Paul Blanchard Matt Holzer U. Hoomiforgot Dan Look Sebastian Marotta Monica Moreno Rocha Yakov Shapiro David Uminsky

17 A rational map of degree 2n.
Dynamics of complex and A rational map of degree 2n.

18 Dynamics of complex and A rational map of degree 2n. The Julia set is:
The closure of the set of repelling periodic points; The boundary of the escaping orbits; The chaotic set. The Fatou set is the complement of

19 When , the Julia set is the unit circle

20 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

21 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

22 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

23 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

24 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

25 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

26 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

27 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)

28 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

29 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

30 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

31 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

32 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

33 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

34 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

35 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

36 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

37 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

38 When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:

39 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

40 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

41 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

42 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

43 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

44 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

45 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

46 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

47 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

48 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

49 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

50 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

51 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

52 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

53 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

54 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

55 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

56 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

57 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

58 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

59 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

60 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

61 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

62 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

63 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

64 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

65 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

66 When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.

67 When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes

68 When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes A Sierpinski curve

69 When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes Another Sierpinski curve

70 When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes Also a Sierpinski curve

71 The Julia set has 2n-fold symmetry since
Easy computations: The Julia set has 2n-fold symmetry since where is a 2nth root of unity

72 Easy computations: 2n free critical points

73 Easy computations: 2n free critical points

74 Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values

75 Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values

76 Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values

77 Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values But really only 1 free critical orbit since the map has 2n-fold symmetry

78 Easy computations: B is superattracting, so have immediate basin B mapped n-to-1 to itself.

79 Easy computations: B is superattracting, so have immediate basin B mapped n-to-1 to itself. T 0 is a pole, so have trap door T mapped n-to-1 to B.

80 So any orbit that eventually
Easy computations: B is superattracting, so have immediate basin B mapped n-to-1 to itself. T 0 is a pole, so have trap door T mapped n-to-1 to B. So any orbit that eventually enters B must do so by passing through T.

81 There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B:
The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B:

82 There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B:
The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B: B is a Cantor set

83 The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B: B is a Cantor set T is a Cantor set of simple closed curves (this case does not occur if n = 2)

84 The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B: B is a Cantor set T is a Cantor set of simple closed curves (this case does not occur if n = 2) T is a Sierpinski curve

85 parameter plane when n = 3 Case 1: B is a Cantor set

86 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

87 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

88 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

89 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

90 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

91 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

92 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

93 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

94 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

95 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

96 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

97 parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set

98 B is a Cantor set Draw curves connecting the
two critical values to in B

99 B is a Cantor set The preimages are curves
passing through the critical points and connecting c to

100 B is a Cantor set The preimages are curves
passing through the critical points and connecting c to and to 0

101 Choose a large circle in B
is a Cantor set Choose a large circle in B

102 and locate its two preimages
B is a Cantor set and locate its two preimages

103 Construct the regions I0, ... I2n-1
B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Construct the regions I0, ... I2n-1

104 B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij

105 B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij

106 B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij

107 B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij

108 B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij is a Cantor set

109 Case 2: the critical values lie in T, not B
parameter plane when n = 3

110 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 T lies in the McMullen domain

111 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain Remark: There is no McMullen domain in the case n = 2.

112 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain

113 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain

114 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain

115 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain

116 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain

117 lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain

118 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
v c Why is the preimage of T an annulus?

119 Could it be that each critical point lies in a disjoint preimage of T?

120 Could it be that each critical point lies in a disjoint preimage of T?
No. The map would then be 4n to 1 on the preimage of T.

121 By 2n-fold symmetry, there can then be only
Could it be that each critical point lies in a disjoint preimage of T? No. The map would then be 4n to 1 on the preimage of T. By 2n-fold symmetry, there can then be only one preimage of T

122 Riemann-Hurwitz formula:
F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R

123 Riemann-Hurwitz formula:
F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) *

124 In our case, R is the trap door and D is the
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * In our case, R is the trap door and D is the preimage of T

125 Riemann-Hurwitz formula:
F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * We have deg F = 2n on D, so n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) *

126 and R = T is a disk, so n(R) = 1
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * and R = T is a disk, so n(R) = 1 n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (1 - 2) + (# of critical points in D) *

127 and there are 2n critical points in D
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * and there are 2n critical points in D n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (1 - 2) ( 2n ) = 0 *

128 and there are 2n critical points in D
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * and there are 2n critical points in D n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (1 - 2) ( 2n ) = 0 * so n(D) = 2 and the preimage of T is an annulus.

129 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
v c So the preimage of T is an annulus.

130 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T B and T are mapped n-to-1 to B

131 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T The white annulus is mapped 2n-to-1 to T

132 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T So all that’s left are the blue annuli, and each are mapped n-to-1 to the union of the blue and white annuli.

133 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T So there are sub-annuli in the blue annuli that are mapped onto the white annulus.

134 J is a Cantor set of “circles”

135 J is a Cantor set of “circles”

136 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
then all other preimages of F-1(T) contain no critical points, and F is an n - to -1 covering on each, so the remaining preimages of T are all annuli.

137 J is a Cantor set of “circles”
These annuli fill out the Fatou set; removing all of them leaves us with a Cantor set of simple closed curves (McMullen)

138 Curiously, this cannot happen when n = 2.

139 Reason: Modulus of an annulus
1 r A Any annulus in the plane is conformally isomorphic to a unique round annulus of the form

140 Reason: Modulus of an annulus
1 r A Any annulus in the plane is conformally isomorphic to a unique round annulus of the form Then the modulus of A is

141 Reason: Modulus of an annulus
1 r A Any annulus in the plane is conformally isomorphic to a unique round annulus of the form Then the modulus of A is And if F : A A2 is an analytic n-to-1 covering map, then mod (A2) = n mod (A1)

142 This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain 2-to-1,

143 This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain 2-to-1, so the modulus of is 1/2 the modulus of

144 This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain 2-to-1, so the modulus of is 1/2 the modulus of , same with

145 This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain But then mod ( ) + mod ( ) = mod ( ) so there is no room for the middle annulus

146 Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are When n > 2 we have

147 Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are When n > 2 we have so the critical value lies in T when is small.

148 Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are But when n = 2 we have

149 Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are But when n = 2 we have So, as , and 1/4 is nowhere near the basin of when is small

150 Parameter planes n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain

151 Parameter planes n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain

152 n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain

153 n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain

154 There is a lot of structure around the McMullen domain when n > 2
but a very different structure when n = 2.

155 Case 3: the critical orbit eventually lands in the trap door
is a “Sierpinski curve.”

156 Sierpinski Curve A Sierpinski curve is any planar
set that is homeomorphic to the Sierpinski carpet fractal. The Sierpinski Carpet

157 Topological Characterization
Any planar set that is: 1. compact 2. connected 3. locally connected 4. nowhere dense 5. any two complementary domains are bounded by simple closed curves that are pairwise disjoint is a Sierpinski curve. The Sierpinski Carpet

158 A Sierpinski curve is a universal plane continuum:
More importantly.... A Sierpinski curve is a universal plane continuum: Any planar, one-dimensional, compact, connected set can be homeomorphically embedded in a Sierpinski curve. For example....

159 The topologist’s sine curve
can be embedded inside

160 The topologist’s sine curve
can be embedded inside

161 The topologist’s sine curve
can be embedded inside skip Knaster

162 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

163 Start with the Cantor middle-thirds set
Knaster continuum A well known example of an indecomposable continuum Start with the Cantor middle-thirds set

164 Knaster continuum Connect symmetric points about 1/2 with semicircles

165 Knaster continuum Do the same below about 5/6

166 Knaster continuum And continue....

167 Knaster continuum

168 Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set.

169 Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set. It accumulates everywhere on itself and on K.

170 Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set. It accumulates everywhere on itself and on K. And is the only piece of K that is accessible from the outside.

171 Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set. It accumulates everywhere on itself and on K. And is the only piece of K that is accessible from the outside. But there are infinitely many other curves in K, each of which is dense in K.

172 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

173 Note the Cantor middle-thirds set along the middle horizontal line
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside Note the Cantor middle-thirds set along the middle horizontal line

174 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

175 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

176 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

177 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

178 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

179 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

180 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

181 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

182 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

183 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

184 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

185 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

186 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

187 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

188 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

189 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

190 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

191 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

192 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

193 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

194 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

195 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

196 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

197 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

198 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

199 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

200 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

201 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

202 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

203 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

204 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

205 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

206 The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside

207 Even this “curve” can be embedded inside

208 can be embedded inside Even this “curve” Moreover, Sierpinski curves
occur all the time as Julia sets.

209 lies in a Sierpinski hole
Case 3: the critical orbit eventually lands in the trap door. parameter plane when n = 3 T lies in a Sierpinski hole

210 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

211 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

212 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

213 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

214 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

215 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

216 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

217 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

218 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

219 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

220 lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole

221 To show that is homeomorphic to

222 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s

223 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s Fatou set is the union of the preimages of B; all disjoint, open disks.

224 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s Fatou set is the union of the preimages of B; all disjoint, open disks.

225 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s If J contains an open set, then J = C.

226 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s If J contains an open set, then J = C.

227 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s No recurrent critical orbits, no parabolic points., and F is hyperbolic on J....

228 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s No recurrent critical orbits, no parabolic points., and F is hyperbolic on J....

229 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s J locally connected, so the boundaries are locally connected. Need to show they are s.c.c.’s. Can only meet at (preimages of) critical points, hence disjoint.

230 Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s So J is a Sierpinski curve.

231 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3)

232 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) Reason: The equation reduces to a polynomial of degree (n-1)(2n)(k-3) , and it can be shown that all the roots of this polynomial are distinct. (You can put a Böttcher coordinate on each Sierpinski hole).

233 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) Reason: The equation reduces to a polynomial of degree (n-1)(2n)(k-3) , and it can be shown that all the roots of this polynomial are distinct. (You can put a Böttcher coordinate on each Sierpinski hole). So we have exactly that many “centers” of Sierpinski holes, i.e., parameters for which the critical points all land on 0 and then

234 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 3 2 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3

235 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 3 2 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3

236 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 4 12 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3

237 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 4 12 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3

238 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 4 escape time 3 3 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 4

239 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 4 escape time 4 24 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 4

240 Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 4 escape time 12 402,653,184 Sierpinski holes Sorry. I forgot to indicate their locations. parameter plane n = 4

241 Given two Sierpinski curve Julia
sets, when do we know that the dynamics on them are the same, i.e., the maps are conjugate on the Julia sets? Main Question: These sets are homeomorphic, but are the dynamics on them the same?

242 Given two Sierpinski curve Julia
sets, when do we know that the dynamics on them are the same, i.e., the maps are conjugate on the Julia sets? Main Question: We know when two maps with Sierpinski curve Julia sets are conjugate on their Julia sets (next lecture), but: Problem: What is the different dynamical behavior when two such maps are not conjugate on their Julia sets. Clearly a job for symbolic dynamics.....

243 Other ways that Sierpinski curve Julia sets arise:
Buried points in Cantor necklaces; 2. Main cardioids in buried Mandelbrot sets; Cantor sets of circles around the McMullen domain; 4. Other families of rational maps; 5. Sierpinski gaskets 6. Major applications

244 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The necklace is the Cantor middle thirds set with disks replacing removed intervals. parameter plane n = 4

245 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There is a Cantor necklace along the negative real axis parameter plane n = 4

246 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
5 5 4 3 4 The open disks are Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 4

247 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
5 5 4 3 4 The open disks are Sierpinski holes; the buried points in the Cantor set also correspond to Sierpinski curves; parameter plane n = 4

248 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
5 5 4 3 4 The open disks are Sierpinski holes; the buried points in the Cantor set also correspond to Sierpinski curves; and all are dynamically different. parameter plane n = 4

249 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
A similar Cantor necklace when n = 2 The parameter plane when n = 2

250 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
A similar Cantor necklace when n = 2 The parameter plane when n = 2

251 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
6 6 5 4 5 A similar Cantor necklace when n = 2 The parameter plane when n = 2

252 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

253 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

254 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; they map to the imaginary axis; A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

255 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; they map to the imaginary axis; and then to the real axis, where the orbit then remains forever. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

256 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; they map to the imaginary axis; and then to the real axis, where the orbit then remains forever. So the critical orbits are non-recurrrent J is locally connected. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

257 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The only Fatou components are B and its preimages since the critical orbits lie in a Cantor set which is not in the Fatou set J is compact and connected. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

258 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There is a Fatou component J is nowhere dense A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

259 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There is a Fatou component J is nowhere dense, and same arguments as before show that the boundary consists of disjoint simple closed curves J is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2

260 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The “endpoints” in the Cantor set (parameters on the boundaries of the Sierpinski holes) do not correspond to Sierpinski curves. A “hybrid” Sierpinski curve; some boundary curves meet.

261 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The “endpoints” in the Cantor set (parameters on the boundaries of the Sierpinski holes) do not correspond to Sierpinski curves. Certain preimages of T touch each other at (pre)-critical points. A “hybrid” Sierpinski curve; some boundary curves meet.

262 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There are lots of other Cantor necklaces in the parameter planes. parameter plane n = 2

263 1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There are lots of other Cantor necklaces in the parameter planes. parameter plane n = 2

264 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. n = 4

265 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. n = 4

266 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. n = 4

267 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

268 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

269 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

270 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

271 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

272 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

273 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

274 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

275 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

276 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

277 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

278 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

279 If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4

280 If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. n = 3

281 If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. n = 3

282 If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. All parameters on these curves correspond to Sierpinski curves. n = 3

283 If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. And all non-symmetrically located parameters on these curves have very different dynamics on J. n = 3

284 If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 2 centers n = 3

285 If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 4 centers n = 3

286 If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 10 centers n = 3

287 If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 28 centers n = 3

288 If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 82 centers n = 3

289 If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. passes through 1,594,324 centers. n = 3

290 If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. As before, all non- symmetrically located centers have different dynamics. n = 3

291 Consider the family of maps
where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Mandelbrot set.

292 Consider the family of maps
where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Mandelbrot set.

293 Consider the family of maps
where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Mandelbrot set.

294 , the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.

295 , the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.

296 , the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.

297 , the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.

298 , the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes. A doubly-inverted Douady rabbit.

299 If you chop off the “ears” of each internal rabbit in each component
of the original Julia set, then what’s left is another Sierpinski curve (provided that both of the critical orbits eventually escape).

300 The (generalized) Sierpinski gasket also occurs
(although rarely) as a Julia set in these families

301 Choose at the tip of the parameter plane on the negative real axis
Parameter plane for n=2, d=1

302 This Julia set is homeomorphic to the gasket

303 If is a Misiurewicz parameter on the boundary of the
connectedness locus, then is a “generalized” gasket. Parameter plane for n=2, d=1

304 If is a Misiurewicz parameter on the boundary of the
connectedness locus, then is a “generalized” gasket. Parameter plane for n=2, d=1

305 If is a Misiurewicz parameter on the boundary of the
connectedness locus, then is a “generalized” gasket. Parameter plane for n=2, d=1

306 None of these other Julia sets are homeomorphic
to the Sierpinski gasket, however.

307 None of these other Julia sets are homeomorphic
to the Sierpinski gasket, however.

308 None of these other Julia sets are homeomorphic
to the Sierpinski gasket, however. T The “triangle” T touches the inner triangle twice, not once.

309 For other values of n and d, the generalized
Sierpinski gaskets are not triangular. T n = d = 2 A “square” gasket

310 For other values of n and d, the generalized
Sierpinski gaskets are not triangular. n = 3, d = 2 A “pentagonal” gasket

311 Here’s the parameter plane when n = 2:

312 and this object appears everywhere.....
Rotate it by 90 degrees: and this object appears everywhere.....

313


Download ppt "Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google