Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The 3 prisoners dilemma Inferring more complex values

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The 3 prisoners dilemma Inferring more complex values"— Presentation transcript:

1 The 3 prisoners dilemma Inferring more complex values
Last Tutorial The 3 prisoners dilemma Inferring more complex values

2 The 3 prisoners dilemma - Story
There are currently 3 prisoners on death row - A, B and C. Only one of them is to be executed and the other 2 murders will be released – Cuz’ logic. Prisoner A makes a request to the guard – tell me which of the other 2 would be released. To which he answers – Prisoner B.

3 The 3 prisoners dilemma – Story (2)
Prisoner A thinks to himself – before I asked – I had 33% chance of being executed. Now – those chances have risen to 50% What did I do wrong? I made certain not to ask for any information relevant to my own fate…

4 Definitions 𝐼 𝐵 is the proposition : “Prisoner B will be released”
𝐺 𝐴 is the proposition : “Prisoner A will be executed” Since 𝐺 𝐴 ⇒ 𝐼 𝐵 (If A is executed, B is released) we get 𝑃 𝐼 𝐵 𝐺 𝐴 =1 𝑃 𝐺 𝐴 𝐼 𝐵 = 𝑃 𝐼 𝐵 𝐺 𝐴 𝑃( 𝐺 𝐴 ) 𝑃( 𝐼 𝐵 ) = = 1 2

5 When the bare facts won’t do
When facts are wrongly formulated, we might draw false conclusions Prisoner A might think to himself – If the guard had named C instead of B then by sheer symmetry I would also have 50% of being executed. So I had 50% to begin with. Which is clearly false. This happens because we omit the context – or rather, what was the question in the first place? – If the question was “Would B be executed?” this analysis would have been correct.

6 New context 𝐼 𝐵 ′ = “Guard said that B will be released”
𝑃 𝐺 𝐴 𝐼 𝐵 ′ = 𝑃 𝐼 𝐵 ′ 𝐺 𝐴 𝑃 𝐺 𝐴 𝑃 𝐼 𝐵 ′ = 1 2 ⋅ = 1 3

7 The thousand prisoners problem
Same setting – but now 999 are to be freed, 1 is to be executed. Prisoner A finds a list – containing 998 names of to be freed prisoners. Sadly for prisoner A, his name is not among them.

8 Implications of said list
If all the prisoners in the list were chosen at random – his chances of survival are abysmal. If the query for that list would be – print me 998 right handed, innocent prisoners, while he’s the only left handed prisoner in Jail – he still has 999/1000 chance of survival. Even though we don’t change the information we were given – the likelihood of A being executed changes.

9 Intuition If a prisoner would be given the query (right handed only) before he found the list – the results would not surprise him, since he knows he would not be among them If he found the list before the query – even though the math is exactly the same, psychologically – he would be freaking out. This intuition basically translates into a prior. How so?

10 What else can Bayesian networks compute?

11 Boolean functions of variables
Let’s say we are interested in the value of ( 𝑥 2 ∨ 𝑥 3 )∧ 𝑥 6 We can do so by easily creating new OR and AND nodes. Let 𝑄 ′ =𝑂𝑅( 𝑥 2 , 𝑥 3 ) 𝑄=𝐴𝑁𝐷( 𝑄 ′ , 𝑥 6 ) Finally, we use the same inference tools. 𝑥 1 𝑥 2 𝑥 3 𝑥 5 𝑥 4 𝑄′ 𝑥 6 Figure 4.35 𝑄

12 Fin


Download ppt "The 3 prisoners dilemma Inferring more complex values"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google