Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Where have we been? Cartography as communication systems: then (linear) and now (cyclical) Geospatial data Visualization Pipeline (Ben Fry) Getting a message.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Where have we been? Cartography as communication systems: then (linear) and now (cyclical) Geospatial data Visualization Pipeline (Ben Fry) Getting a message."— Presentation transcript:

1 Where have we been? Cartography as communication systems: then (linear) and now (cyclical) Geospatial data Visualization Pipeline (Ben Fry) Getting a message to, communicating with, a map user Eye to brain processes How to design maps (eg. groupings, figure ground, visual hierarchies) for effective cartographic communication Audience: motivation, cognition

2 Where are we going today:
Understanding the PURPOSE of the map What Activities are the map user suppose to perform with the map? Detect? Estimate? Measure? Correlate? Visualize? Explore? Link: map use activities with visual processing tasks reading, analysis, interpretation peripheral/foveal = User Centered Design

3 User Centered Design (UCD) From then and static to now and interactive
Readings Board, 1978 “Map reading tasks appropriate in experimental studies in cartographic communication” Canadian Cartographer, vol. 15 (1978): 5 Amy Griffin et al “Designing across map use contexts: a research agenda” International Journal of Cartography 2017 Robert E. Roth, Kevin S. Ross and Alan M. MacEachren. “User-Centered Design for Interactive Maps: A Case Study in Crime Analysis” ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. (2015), 4(1), ; doi: /ijgi

4 Lecture Outline Map Use Activities Map use design methodology
- Board (1978) Map use design methodology HWCastner/SHermansen 3. Interactive Maps: Map Use Context Amy Griffin et al (2017) Roth (2015)

5 1. Map Use Activities a) Map Purpose
What are we suppose to do with the map: Map Reading Map Analysis Map Interpretation

6 Map Reading Lowest order of processing detection discrimination
identification, recognition, verification estimation Board, 1978 “Map reading tasks appropriate in experimental studies in cartographic communication” Canadian Cartographer, vol. 15 (1978): 5

7 Map Analysis Map Interpretation analyze/describe spatial relationships
higher order cognitive processing Map Interpretation seek explanations for the patterns and relationships visualize/imaginations highest order of cognitive process

8 Boards Map use activities
lower Map reading analysis and interpretation activities: Map Reading (navigation, orientation) position, reference, direction, distance Map Analysis - Spatial comparisons: Measurement, nominal counts, ordinal compare and contrast, interval value assessment Map Interpretation Regional delimitations; pattern recognition: visualization Scanning for visual organization, grouping, higher

9 Evaluation What sort of map? For whom is the map intended?
Under what conditions will the map be used? What map reading activities are appropriate for stated purpose?

10 Purpose / Activities / Evaluation
Board wanted cartographers to link Purpose / Activities / Evaluation to Design Past mapping to present mapping? Does this still ‘work’?

11 Visual processing tasks
1970/80: In parallel to Boards research on Map Use Activities and Design… Visual processing tasks Peripheral vision Foveal vision Cognition (experiences, motivation…) Implications for map use design Establishing visual hierarchies Visual contrast Visual groupings

12 Develop links between:
map reading/analysis/interpretation what are our map use activities = evaluation criteria And visual processing tasks For User Centered Design

13 A research Methodology for User Centered Map Design

14 research in map perception
Establish: Map Use Activities and Visual processing Tasks to guide map design Castner and McGrath goal: Link: analysis of map user information needs to research in map perception thereby Designing effective map symbols

15 through an understanding of
Procedure: Clarify map content through an understanding of information needs; which in turn provide design options that relate to the way the map content is seen when using a map

16 Procedure based upon: Map user Activities (Board’s map tasks)
user group analysis of map elements / symbols need necessary to map Visual processing Tasks eye-brain organization/hierarchies Symbol design

17 Example: Nautical Charts
Step1 Interview Pleasure boaters Step2 Determine Activities and associated map elements that support activities Step3: Determine visual processing tasks associated with activities Step4: propose design alternatives

18

19 Thoughts on this Map design methodology for today?

20

21 User Centred Design (UCD) Roth et al 2015
the process of ensuring interface success (map-based or otherwise) by gathering input and feedback from target users throughout the design and development of the interface loops in which target users provided input and feedback on needs and designs (user), prompting revisions to the conceptualization and functional requirements of the interface (utility), and ultimately leading to new mockups and prototypes of the interface (usability) for additional evaluation by target users… etc loop. user→utility→usability

22 User (group) Target the user group: community of map users

23 Utility usefulness of an interface for completing the user’s desired set of objectives Benchmarks Activities and tasks

24 Usability Learnability Efficiency Memorability
Error frequency and severity Subjective satisfaction

25

26

27

28 Interactive crime maps
City of Vancouver Crime map City of Toronto, CBC maps crime

29 Griffin, 2017, International
Journal of Cartography

30 Context and map users Spatial abilities Disabilities
Education, training, jobs (taxi drivers) Limiting factors of technology on spatial abilities (navigation directions) Disabilities Colour blindness Vision impairment Individual differences Gender, age

31 Context and map use environment
What Laptop, mobile, VR, static When Seasonal, day/night With whom Individual collaborative Behaviour profiling Maps adapting to where we are

32 Context and the map Dynamic data Privacy Device Representation
mobile Representation Multi scale, visual analytics alongside Interfaces Different interactions – touch screen, click

33 Examples Point a to b in urban city
1 local, red green colour blindness, time constraint 2 non-local no time constraint Identify similar and different context Based on this, identify relevant design solutions

34

35

36 Summary…

37 Where have we been? Cartography as communication systems: then (linear) and now (cyclical) Geospatial data Visualization Pipeline (Ben Fry) Getting a message to, communicating with, a map user Eye to brain processes How to design maps (eg. groupings, figure ground, visual hierarchies) for effective cartographic communication Audience: motivation, cognition

38 Where are we going today:
Understanding the PURPOSE of the map What Activities are the map user suppose to perform with the map? Detect? Estimate? Measure? Correlate? Visualize? Explore? Link: map use activities with visual processing tasks reading, analysis, interpretation peripheral/foveal = User Centered Design Complications with Context: Static / Interactive


Download ppt "Where have we been? Cartography as communication systems: then (linear) and now (cyclical) Geospatial data Visualization Pipeline (Ben Fry) Getting a message."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google