Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparing shorter with conventional MDR-TB treatment in Uzbekistan 2-month culture conversion rates and treatment outcomes P du Cros1, A Khamraev2, D Lister3,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparing shorter with conventional MDR-TB treatment in Uzbekistan 2-month culture conversion rates and treatment outcomes P du Cros1, A Khamraev2, D Lister3,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparing shorter with conventional MDR-TB treatment in Uzbekistan 2-month culture conversion rates and treatment outcomes P du Cros1, A Khamraev2, D Lister3, A Ronnachit3, C Berry1, J Greig1, N Parpieva4, M Tillyashaykhov 4, G Cooke5, S Dietrich6, T Pylypenko3, Z Tigay2, J Achar1 1 Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Manson Unit, London, UK; 2 Ministry of Health, Nukus, Uzbekistan; 3 MSF, Nukus, Uzbekistan; 4 Ministry of Health, Tashkent, Uzbekistan; 5 Imperial College, London; 6 MSF, Berlin, Germany @dr_jay_a

2 Uzbekistan Included in WHO list of 30 high burden MDR-TB countries
MDR-TB burden New cases 23%; Retreatment 62%* Fluoroquinolone resistance 7.6%# Injectable resistance 18.1%# # Eurosurveillance 18:

3 Aims To test for an association between treatment regimen (SCR or Conventional Care) and: 2-month culture conversion status, and Treatment outcome months after treatment start in patients with pulmonary MDR-TB

4 Short Course Regimen (SCR)
Single-arm prospective observational Three districts Started recruitment September 2013 Regimen: 4-6 HZECmMfxPtoCfz – 5 ZEMfxPtoCfz

5 Shorter Course MDR TB Regimen (SCR)
Inclusion: Pulmonary MDR-TB (MTBDR plus, Xpert® MTB/RIF, MGIT 960) Exclusion: History of treatment with second-line drugs >1 month Resistance to fluoroquinolone or both Km and Cm, or XDR-TB Leaving some text as 22 as easier to read – if 24 then makes slide more congested

6 Methods Comparison groups: SCR CC
recruited into prospective single arm study CC Same programme, different districts, same time period Received WHO-approved 20+ month regimen Ethics approval granted by MSF and Uzbek ERB, and the retrospective analysis met the criteria of the MSF Ethics Review Board for exemption from ethics review

7 Methods 2 month sputum culture conversion Final Outcomes
2 negative sputum cultures >30 days apart Final Outcomes Evaluated months after treatment start: CC Success: evaluated at end of treatment SCR Success: evaluated 12 months after end of treatment

8 Baseline characteristics
CC (%) (N=230) SCR (%) (N=102) P-value (χ2 or ranksum) Sex – Female 108 (47.0) 54 (52.9) 0.31 Age (median, IQR) 29.4 (23.9; 42.8) 31.0 (24.0; 50.8) 0.36 Not employed 204 (88.7) 89 (90.8) 0.57 Reports heavy alcohol use 16 (7.0) 6 (5.9) 0.72 BMI <18.5 101 (43.9) 34 (33.3) 0.07 Has diabetes mellitus 8 (7.8) 0.77 HIV positive 0 (0) 1.00

9 Disease characteristics
CC (%) (N=230) SCR (%) (N=102) P-value (χ2 or ranksum) Has X-ray cavities 117 (51.1) 39 (41.5) 0.12 Baseline smear: negative 108 (47.6) 46 (46.0) 0.18 scanty 25 (11.0) 10 (10.0) 1+ 63 (27.8) 38 (38.0) 2+ 19 (8.4) 3 (3.0) 3+ 12 (5.3) Baseline resistance* Kanamycin 54 (28.1) 28 (27.5) 0.91 * Proportions exclude missing from denominator

10 2-month culture conversion
2m culture conv (%) Unadjusted OR 2m culture conv (95% CI) Fully adjusted OR P-value (Wald) Treatment group CC 109 (52) 1 SCR 61 (69) 2.09 (1.23; 3.55) 1.93 (1.08; 3.43) 0.026 Age (per increasing year) 0.98 (0.96; 0.99) 0.97 (0.96; 0.99) <0.001 Sex Male 77 (53%) Female 93 (61%) 1.41 (0.89; 2.24) 1.60 (0.96; 2.67) 0.07 Baseline smear Neg 84 (75%) Scanty/1+ 72 (55%) 0.40 (0.23; 0.69) 0.37 (0.21; 0.66) 2+/3+ 14 (26%) 0.12 (0.06; 0.25) 0.12 (0.05; 0.26) Small font – how to convey thi information in easily readabcle fashion?

11 Final outcomes Unsuccessful outcome (%)
Unadjusted OR of outcomes (95% CI) Fully adjusted OR of outcomes (95% CI) P-value (Wald) Treatment group CC 73 (31.7) 1 SCR 36 (35.3) 1.17 (0.72; 1.92) 1.17 (0.69; 1.96) 0.56 Age (per increasing year) 1.02 (1.01; 1.04) 0.009 Sex Male 61 (35.9) Female 48 (29.6) 0.75 (0.47; 1.19) 0.72 (0.45; 1.16) 0.18 Cavities on Xray No 50 (29.9) Yes 55 (35.3) 1.27 (0.80; 2.03) 1.20 (0.74; 1.93) 0.46

12 Limitations Bias: Non-randomized
However, similar staff and same lab across both groups Also, very similar models of care across both groups Confounding Potential for confounding from unmeasured variables

13 Conclusions SCR treatment results in higher culture conversion by 2 months Similar final outcomes despite significantly shorter treatment Encouraging results from an established programme

14 Discussion Context of high background rates of second line drug resistance and low HIV prevalence Results may be generalizable to other former Soviet states Shortened treatment could have positive impact on transmissibility, reduced programme work and reduced patient costs RCT study results awaited with great anticipation

15 Acknowledgements Patients, doctors and nurses in Karakalpakstan
MSF field teams Ministry of Health, Uzbekistan Dr Nargiza Parpieva Dr Mirzagalib Tillashaikov Ministry of Health, Karakalpakstan Dr Atadjan Khamraev Dr Zinaida Tigay MSF Team Uzbekistan Add picture


Download ppt "Comparing shorter with conventional MDR-TB treatment in Uzbekistan 2-month culture conversion rates and treatment outcomes P du Cros1, A Khamraev2, D Lister3,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google