1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – NAGALAND On 09.04.2009
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – NAGALAND On 1

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in NAGALAND (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of unspent balances as on ?
How regular is the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was it disbursed to Districts? What is the level of its utilisation at school level?
How utilisation of food grains and cooking cost is synchronized?
How is the utilisation of foodgrains reconciled with the number of meals served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Desirable stock in hand : 10% (+ or - 5%)
Lifting of food grains as on : 85%
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 77% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is required to be lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost should be synchronous.
State’s AWP&B should be in accordance with MHRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B should be authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. No. of Schools Covered (PY + UP.PY)

7. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
100% Covered
100% Covered
No. of children (In lakh)
100% Covered
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(100%)
No. of Working days
(77%)
(77%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Meals in Q1+Q2+Q3)
100%
Benchmark 77 %
77 % meals served
77% meals to be served
No. of Meal (in Crore)
PAB Approval 08-09
2.15 lakhs. Children X 200 Working days = 4.30 Cr. Meals.
PAB(Q1+Q2+Q3)
2.15 lakhs. Children X 153 Working days = 3.29 Cr. meals (100%)
State(Q1+Q2+Q3)
2.15 lakhs. Children X 155 Working days = 3.33 Cr. meals (101%)

10. Foodgrains Lifting as per G.O.I. (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
100%
Benchmark (77+10)%
84%
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Foodgrains Lifting as per AWP&B 09-10
100%
Benchmark (77+10)%
Foodgrains (in MTs)
81%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Foodgrains Lifting Mismatch (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
3% Less
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Benchmark (77)%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Food grains lifting Month-wise cumulative (Including USB*)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Foodgrains Utilisation (Q1+Q2+Q3)
100%
81%
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Benchmark 77%
Note : Availability (as per the AWP&B ) =
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Cooking Cost Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
100%
77%
Benchmark 77%
23%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Mismatch in Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking cost (District-wise)
NOTE: Foodgrains utilisation is 77% uniformly in all 26 Districts.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Mismatch of Utilisation-AWP&B No of meals served, Cooking Cost, Foodgrains (Q1+Q2+Q3)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
100%
75%
Benchmark 75%
75%
74%
25%
74%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
100%
81%
19%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)
99%
99%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices)
97%
97%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Utilisation
81%
77% 2.
Cooking Cost Utilisation 3.
MME Utilisation
75% 4.
Kitchen Shed construction
99%
100% 5.
Kitchen Devices procurement
97% 6.
QPRs
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. ISSUES
Reply/ATR on PAC para (2007)& CAG Audit paras(2000) are still awaited from the state.
There is excess lifting of foodgrains by the state.
Confirmation of foodgrains lifted by state from FCI for the period MAY to DEC 2008 for Primary & MAY to SEP for Upper Primary is still awaited.
Information sought by the Ministry is not sent in time.

24. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
5% Decreased
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09(UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. No Year As per DISE data As per MDM Sanctions 1 2006-07 178 240 2
No. of School days No
Year
As per DISE data
As per MDM Sanctions 1
178
240 2
182
243 3 NA
200 4
200(State Claim)

30. PAB’s Recommendations (2009-10)
80% of the state demand
Population is decreasing by 4.5%
SSA Enrollment/DISE data 1.33 Lakhs (07-08)

31. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India