Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

12 Elections and Voting Justin Hayworth/AP Images

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "12 Elections and Voting Justin Hayworth/AP Images"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 12 Elections and Voting Justin Hayworth/AP Images
In order to be elected to Congress, candidates must convince voters to turn out on Election Day. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) appeals to voters as a down-to-earth farm girl in 2014. Justin Hayworth/AP Images

3 12 Learning Objectives We will begin this chapter by taking a historical look at American elections, and dividing elections into four types. Next we will examine procedures for general elections, and contrast presidential and congressional elections. We will learn why incumbents have an advantage. Then we will discuss how voters make choices. Finally, we will consider voter turnout and learn ways that it might be improved. Trace the roots of American elections, and distinguish among the four different types of elections. 12.1 Outline the electoral procedures for presidential and general elections. 12.2

4 12 Learning Objectives Compare and contrast congressional and presidential elections, and explain the incumbency advantage. 12.3 Identify seven factors that influence voter choice. 12.4

5 12 Learning Objectives Identify six factors that affect voter turnout.
12.5 Explain why voter turnout is low, and evaluate methods for improving voter turnout. 12.6

6 Roots of American Elections
12.1 Roots of American Elections The frequency with which Americans select their leaders has undoubtedly contributed to the growing sense of apathy many seem to feel on Election Day. After all, how can anything that happens so often—every November, in fact, if not more often at the local level—be truly remarkable, sacred, and worth the minor inconvenience of leaving for work early or cutting out a little early? Ask citizens of other countries that are not democracies how remarkable they find the fact that Americans hold more elections at all levels of government than any other nation on earth. The number of Americans eligible to vote has grown over time. And yet, for all the blood shed to give all citizens the right to influence their government in this way, only about half of all eligible voters bother to cast a ballot. In this first section, we will examine the purposes of elections and distinguish among different types of elections. Purposes of Elections Types of Elections

7 Purposes of Elections 12.1 Popular election Fill public offices
Provides unique legitimacy to government Proof of popular sovereignty, or consent of the governed Electorate, or citizens eligible to vote, judge those in power. Fill public offices Elections provide voters a choice in policy. Winners claim a mandate or command from the voters to enact their policy platform. While the simple purpose of elections is to fill public offices and organize our government, the heart of elections goes much deeper than that. A popular election grants legitimacy to a government in a way no other political leadership process can. Popular elections offer proof of popular sovereignty, and in doing so reaffirm the idea of consent of the governed. Elections offer the electorate, or those eligible to vote, a choice in direction and policy. Winners of the elections will claim a mandate, or command from the voters to enact their policy platform.

8 Types of Elections 12.1 Primary Elections General Election
The American electoral process has two stages: the primary election stage and the general election stage. In a primary, voters decide which candidate from within a specific party will go on to challenge a candidate of an opposing party. There are several kinds of primaries. In a closed primary, only voters registered with a particular party can cast a ballot. In an open primary, however, independent voters and sometimes even voters registered with the opposing party can vote. Some social scientists suggest that closed primaries are better because they are protected against crossover voting. This means a voter can vote in a primary of a party with which the voter is not affiliated, and not always with good intent. In some states voters may have the chance to vote in a runoff primary—a contest between the top two vote-getting candidates—when the regular primary fails to produce a winner. Following the primary election comes the general election, in which all registered voters may participate. Primary Elections Closed primaries Open primaries Crossover voting Runoff primary General Election

9 Types of Elections 12.1 Initiative and Referendum Recall
In addition to primaries and general elections, there are initiative and referendum elections, in which the electorate votes directly on proposed legislation or state constitutional amendments. An initiative is placed on the ballot by citizens, while a referendum is placed on the ballot by the state legislature. Finally, there is a recall, an election in which voters can remove an incumbent from office prior to the next regular election. Initiative and Referendum Initiative placed on ballot by citizens Referendum placed on ballot by legislature Recall 9

10 12.1 How are ballot measures used?
Citizens and state legislators use ballot measures to make public policy on a wide range of controversial issues. Here, a sign expresses opposition to Amendment One, a 2012 North Carolina ballot measure that prohibited same-sex marriage in that state. Winston-Salem Journal, Walt Unks/AP Images

11 12.1 12.1 When state lawmakers place a proposal on the ballot for voter approval, it is called a(n) What have you learned about the different types of American elections? Open primary Initiative Referendum Recall

12 12.1 12.1 When state lawmakers place a proposal on the ballot for voter approval, it is called a(n) A measure placed on the ballot by state lawmakers is called a referendum. Open primary Initiative Referendum Recall

13 Presidential Elections
12.2 Presidential Elections Anyone with a television can appreciate the unique character and length of the American presidential election season. Every four years ambitious politicians vie for votes in a series of state contests that run through the winter and spring. They seek first to win delegates to attend their party's national convention in late summer. The candidate who wins the most delegates will go on to face the opposing national party's candidate in November and, the candidate hopes, become the next president of the United States. In this section, we will discuss the primaries and caucuses that lead up to the national convention, and the electoral college that, ultimately, chooses the next president. Primaries and Caucuses Selecting a President: The Electoral College

14 Primaries and Caucuses
12.2 Primaries and Caucuses The Constitution leaves it up to the states to run elections. State political party organizations use several different methods to pick the delegates who will attend the national convention. Some states use the winner-takes-all primary, in which the candidate who wins the most votes in a states secures all of that state's delegates. Democrats no longer use this process, but it is favored by Republicans. Democrats prefer another method, the proportional representation primary, in which candidates who reach at least a minimum percentage of votes secure that same percentage of delegates. This may be fair, but it does tend to lengthen the presidential nomination process. Finally, there are caucuses, which have become more open in recent years but historically were closed-door sessions of party activists. States must select from among these three types of selection processes, and the trend has been moving toward the more open primaries. That trend has been accompanied by another, called front-loading, in which states choose the earliest date possible on the nomination calendar in order to gain the most press attention for their state. This can give the frontrunner candidate an advantage. Methods to select delegates Winner-take-all primary Proportional representation primary Caucus Selecting a system Front-loading

15 12.2 FIGURE 12.1 When do states choose their nominee for president?
These pie graphs show when Republican Party caucuses and primary elections were held in 1976 and The trend toward front-loading is evident. In 2012, for example, most states held their primaries and caucuses in March; in comparison, in 1976, most states held their nominating contests in May. Source: Joshua T. Putnam, frontloading.blogspot.com.

16 Selecting a President: The Electoral College
12.2 Selecting a President: The Electoral College It may seem hard to believe, given all the television ads during presidential election season, but Americans do not directly elect the president. That honor falls to the Electoral College, a uniquely American institution comprised of representatives from each state who cast the final ballots that actually elect the president. The total number of electors for each state is equivalent to the number of senators and representatives the state has. A candidate needs at least 270 votes of the Electoral College to win the presidency. The Electoral College was created as a compromise between Framers who wanted Congress to choose the president and those who wanted a direct, popular election. The system has not been without flaws and challenges. For example, in 1800 Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr received an equal number of Electoral College votes, and the House of Representatives had to break the tie. In 1824, neither Andrew Jackson nor John Quincy Adams received a majority of the votes, and again the House was called in. And in 2000, George W. Bush was declared the winner of the Electoral College vote some five weeks after election, even though it was clear he had lost the popular vote. Historical challenges Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, 1800 John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, 1824 George W. Bush and Al Gore, 2000

17 12.2 How was the 1876 presidential election resolved?
This cartoon from the 1876 presidential election between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel J. Tilden describes the frustration of many Americans with interpreting the constitutional procedures for resolving Electoral College disputes. Ultimately a commission formed by Congress awarded all disputed electors—and the presidency—to Hayes, even though he had lost the popular vote by a 51–48 percent margin. The Granger Collection, NYC

18 Selecting a President: The Electoral College
12.2 Selecting a President: The Electoral College Many questioned whether the Electoral College should be reformed, especially following the 2000 election. Two plans have been suggested. The simplest plan, abolishing the Electoral College and using the popular vote, would require a constitutional amendment and is considered unlikely. The other option, the congressional district plan, would keep the Electoral College but give each candidate one electoral vote for each congressional district he or she wins. Additionally, the overall winner of the popular vote for each state would receive two bonus electoral votes. Should the Electoral College be reformed? Abolish in favor of popular vote Congressional district plan 18

19 12.2 FIGURE How is voting power apportioned in the electoral college? This map visually represents the respective electoral weights of the 50 states in the 2012 presidential election. For each state, the gain or loss of Electoral College votes based on the 2010 Census is indicated in parentheses. Note the loss of seats in the Northeast and the gains in the South and West. Source: CNN,

20 12.2 12.2 The numbers of electors from each state to the Electoral College is: Let's see what you have learned about the Electoral College. Equivalent to the number of representatives Equivalent to the number of representatives and senators Equivalent to the number of congressional districts a candidate wins, plus two bonus electors for the overall popular vote winner None of the above

21 12.2 12.2 The numbers of electors from each state to the Electoral College is: Each state sends to the Electoral College a number equivalent to its representatives plus its senators. Equivalent to the number of representatives Equivalent to the number of representatives and senators Equivalent to the number of congressional districts a candidate wins, plus two bonus electors for the overall popular vote winner None of the above

22 Congressional Elections
12.3 Congressional Elections Certainly when compared to presidential elections, battles to pick congressional representatives are held in obscurity. While individual candidates may get media attention because of a special situation—celebrity sports heroes or television stars, for example—most candidates for Congress struggle to build sufficient name recognition to win the election. As you will see in this section, incumbents enjoy an enormous advantage. But they can, and sometimes even do, lose. The Incumbency Advantage Why Incumbents Lose

23 The Incumbency Advantage
12.3 The Incumbency Advantage Staff Support Directly or indirectly support incumbent through constituent service Visibility Easy access to local media Generous travel allowances Scare-off effect Challengers shy away from incumbent's institutional advantage. Without a doubt, candidates who are already in office, also known as the incumbents, have a huge advantage in congressional elections. As a member of the House, incumbents are allowed to hire up to 18 permanent and four non-permanent aides to work in their Washington and district offices. These staffers directly or indirectly promote the incumbent through constituent services, such as tracking a lost Social Security check or helping a veteran receive his or her benefits. Incumbents also have the advantage of visibility. They have ready access to the local media, and a travel budget that allows them to visit the home district frequently. Finally, incumbents also enjoy the so-called “scare- off” effect, in which potential challengers decide not to subject themselves to the incumbent's institutional advantages.

24 12.3 What are some of the advantages of incumbency?
Incumbent office holders enjoy many advantages in their reelection bids because they have greater visibility and recognition. Here, Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) appears with Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) and his wife, former Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, during a rally for his successful 2014 reelection bid to a sixth term. Senator McConnell spent more than $25 million in campaign expenditures, compared to some $15 million spent by his Democratic opponent, Alison Lundergan Grimes. In addition, outside spending on behalf of Senator McConnell reached $20.4 million, more than twice as much spent on behalf of his opponent. Timothy D. Easley/AP Images

25 Why Incumbents Lose 12.3 Redistricting Scandals Presidential Coattails
Can punish incumbents in the out-of-power party Scandals Sexual improprieties Presidential Coattails Incumbent presidential election loss can trickle down Mid-Term Elections Can threaten incumbents of president's party Incumbents do lose. They can be pushed out via redistricting, which occurs every ten years when state lawmakers redraw the districts following the census. Incumbents can lose or even give up their seat mid-term by scandal, particularly if sex scandals are involved. Incumbents can also lose due to trickle-down effects of presidential coattails. If the president is unpopular and fails to win re- election, that could mean the public is unwilling to re-elect others in the president's party. For that same reason, mid-term elections can pose a threat to incumbents who share the president's party.

26 12.3 TABLE 12.1 How does the president affect congressional elections?
Table 12.1 shows how presidents have affected congressional elections from 1948 until 2014. Source: Congressional Quarterly Guide to U.S. Elections, 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press: Updated by the authors.

27 12.3 12.3 Which of the following is not typically a reason for an incumbent to lose an election? Please answer this multiple-choice question to demonstrate what you have learned about the incumbent advantage. Redistricting Presidential Coattails “Scare-Off” Effect Mid-Term Elections

28 12.3 12.3 Which of the following is not typically a reason for an incumbent to lose an election? The scare-off effect is a term for an incumbent's ability to scare away potential challengers due to the incumbent's institutional advantages. Redistricting Presidential Coattails “Scare-Off” Effect Mid-Term Elections

29 Patterns in Vote Choice
12.4 Patterns in Vote Choice Party Identification Ideology Income and Education Race and Ethnicity Gender Religion Issues The act of voting may seem straightforward enough. Voting is considered conventional political participation, or activism that seeks to influence the political process through commonly accepted methods. Voters may also choose to participate in unconventional political participation, which can be unusual or extreme and can include protests, boycotts, and picketing. But how do voters decide how to vote? That is the question we will address in this section. Party affiliate and ideology top the list of influences, but there is also income and education; race and ethnicity, gender, religion, and specific policy issues.

30 Party Identification and Ideology
12.4 Party Identification and Ideology Party identity and affiliation, and political ideology, are hands-down the most powerful predictors of how a person will vote. Party identity may not fully eliminate ticket- splitting, which is voting for candidates of different parties on the same ticket, but it also can help guide voters on races in which the voters are uninformed. Ideology also motivates voters at the ballot box. Generally speaking, liberals tend to support government involvement in social programs that promote tolerance and social justice. Conservatives tend to support the ideals of individualism and market-based competition. Party Identity Most powerful predictor of vote choice Doesn't fully eliminate ticket splitting Ideology Liberals favor government involvement in social programs. Conservatives favor ideals of individualism and market-based competition.

31 12.4 FIGURE How do demographic characteristics affect voters' choices? Demographic characteristics can be powerful predictors of citizens' choices at the voting booth. Partisanship is the most significant predictor of these decisions. In 2012, for example, 92 percent of Democrats voted for President Barack Obama and 93 percent of Republicans voted for Mitt Romney. Source:

32 Income and Education 12.4 Lower-income voters Higher-income voters
Social scientists have noted that income had been a consistent predictor of voter choice. Put simply, the poor vote Democratic, while the well-off vote heavily Republican. As income and education are connected, it's not surprising that a similar pattern exists for education. The very educated and the least educated citizens tend to vote Democratic, while those with a moderate amount of education, such as a bachelor's degree, tend to vote Republican. Lower-income voters Tend to vote Democratic Higher-income voters Tend to vote Republican Education Most educated and least educated tend to vote Democratic. Voters in the middle, such as those with a bachelor's degree, tend to vote Republican.

33 Race and Ethnicity 12.4 Whites more likely to vote Republican
Distinct voting patterns exist for groups based on their race and ethnicity and their gender. While whites have shown an increasing tendency to vote Republican, the opposite is true for African Americans. They tend to vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. Hispanics also tend to vote for Democrats, but not as consistently as African Americans do. Whites more likely to vote Republican African Americans and Hispanics more likely to vote Democratic

34 Gender 12.4 Women more likely to vote Democratic
When it comes to men and women, the voting gender gap seems alive and well. Women overall tend to lean toward the Democratic side, while men tend to vote more frequently with Republicans. Women more likely to vote Democratic Men more likely to vote Republican

35 12.4 How does gender influence electoral outcomes? Jason Reed/Reuters
The gender gap is one of the most powerful and consistent patterns in American elections. Women are significantly more likely to support Democratic candidates than their male counterparts. Thus, as reflected in this t-shirt, which declares, “Women will decide the election for Obama,” female voters received much of the credit for Democrats' victories in 2012. Jason Reed/Reuters

36 Religion and Other Issues
12.4 Religion and Other Issues Social scientists have long observed patterns in voting among religious groups, but this may be starting to decline. Generally speaking, Jewish voters consistently tend to vote Democratic, while Protestants lean more heavily toward Republicans. Catholics are more divided. Many vote Democratic because they are attracted to the ideals of social justice. But other Catholics are strongly opposed to abortion, and vote Republican in response to that issue. While those strong feelings may influence an individual, there are other issues that motivate voters that are not directly connected to group identity. Often the economy is an issue that motivates individuals to vote a particular way. Voters tend to reward the president's party during good economic times, and punish that party during bad economic times. This is called retrospective judgment because it is based on past performance. At other times, voters use prospective judgement by voting based on what a candidate says he or she will do if elected. Religion Jewish voters strong Democratic Party supporters Protestants more likely to vote Republican Catholics divided Social justice versus abortion Issues Economy often key issue Retrospective judgment versus prospective judgment

37 Issues 12.4 Economy often key issue
While those strong feelings may influence an individual, there are other issues that motivate voters that are not directly connected to group identity. Often the economy is an issue that motivates individuals to vote a particular way. Voters tend to reward the president's party during good economic times, and punish that party during bad economic times. This is called retrospective judgment because it is based on past performance. At other times, voters use prospective judgement by voting based on what a candidate says he or she will do if elected. Economy often key issue Retrospective judgment versus prospective judgment

38 12.4 12.4 When voters reward or punish a political party at the polls based on past achievements or failures, they are using what? We have discussed many ways that voters make choices at the ballot box. Let's answer a question about one of those methods of decision-making. Ticket-splitting Retrospective judgment Prospective judgment None of the above

39 12.4 12.4 When voters reward or punish a political party at the polls based on past achievements or failures, they are using what? Voters use retrospective judgment when they reward or punish a party for past accomplishments. Ticket-splitting Retrospective judgment Prospective judgment None of the above

40 Voter Turnout 12.5 Income and Education Race and Ethnicity Gender Age
When we speak of voter turnout, we are referring to the proportion of eligible voters that actually cast a ballot. While some states may add additional restrictions for felons, generally speaking, any citizen who is at least 18 years old is eligible to vote. Unfortunately, just because people can vote doesn't mean they do. Voter turnout in the United States, at 40 percent, is much lower than in other industrialized democracies. In this section, we will examine some factors that influence voter turnout, such as income and education, race and ethnicity, gender, age, civic engagement, and interest in politics. Income and Education Race and Ethnicity Gender Age Civic Engagement Interest in Politics

41 12.5 TABLE 12.2 How do states regulate voter eligibility?
Table 12.2 shows how many states place a given restriction on voting. Sources: Pew Center on the States, National Council on State Legislatures, and CIRCLE, Activity: Have students write a think piece in class exploring the question of whether there is ever a valid reason to deny someone the ability to vote. Students should be prepared to share their opinions with other members of the class.

42 12.5 Income and Education Individuals with more money are more likely to believe that the system works for them and are, therefore, more likely to vote. People with incomes over $65,000 vote more than citizens with incomes under $35,000. And college graduates are more likely to vote than those with less education. Those with incomes over $65,000 vote more than citizens with incomes under $35,000. College graduates are more likely to vote than those with less education.

43 12.5 Race and Ethnicity When it comes to race and ethnicity, whites tend to vote more than African Americans, Hispanics and other minorities. Social scientists have pointed to the long-term consequences of voting barriers, especially in areas of the Deep South. It wasn't until the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which did away with discriminatory voting barriers, that African Americans began voting in significant numbers. Whites tend to vote more than African Americans, Hispanics, and other minorities. Long-term consequences of voting barriers

44 12.5 FIGURE How has the racial and ethnic composition of voters changed? Although white Americans continue to constitute a majority of the U.S. electorate, black, Hispanic, and Asian voters have accounted for significant percentages of the electorate during recent campaigns. This diversity alters both the voices heard from the voting booth and the demands placed on government. Source: Data from Pew Research Center, “Dissecting the 2008 Electorate: Most Diverse in U.S. History,” April 30, 2009. and

45 12.5 Gender Besides income, education, race and ethnicity, several key factors influence voter turnout. Those include gender, age, civic engagement, and interest in politics. When it comes to gender, women have begun voting more than men, in contrast to their historically lower turnout. Because women constitute slightly more than 50 percent of the population, women account for a majority of the electorate. Women vote more than men, and account for a majority of the electorate.

46 Age 12.5 Older citizens vote more than younger citizens.
Age is also a key factor—the youngest eligible voters tend to vote with the least frequency. Voter turnout increases for people over 30, and declines again after the age of 70. Older citizens vote more than younger citizens.

47 Civic Engagement 12.5 Members of civic groups vote more.
It likely is no surprise that individuals who are involved in civic groups and those who identify as being very interested in politics tend to have high and consistent voter turnout. Members of civic groups vote more.

48 Interest in Politics 12.5 Reliable predictor of voting
It likely is no surprise that individuals who are involved in civic groups and those who identify as being very interested in politics tend to have high and consistent voter turnout. Reliable predictor of voting

49 12.5 All of these are a factor in voter turnout except:
Let's see what you have learned about factors that influence voter turnout. Age and race Income end education Geographic location All of the above

50 12.5 All of these are a factor in voter turnout except:
Geographic location has not been shown to have an impact on voter turnout. Activity: Democratic political systems are defined by the participation of the people in the political process. Yet in a democracy, nonparticipation can also be an effective political strategy. Have your students consider this proposition through the following questions: •Should individuals who choose not to vote have the right to complain about the outcome of an election? •Is nonvoting ever a valid form of political expression? If so, explain how. If not, explain why not. Age and race Income end education Geographic location All of the above

51 Toward Reform: Problems with Voter Turnout
12.6 Toward Reform: Problems with Voter Turnout It can be difficult for elections officials and even candidates to inspire people to actually turn out to vote. That is especially true for mid-term elections, which garner just 40 to 45 percent of eligible voters. Even a presidential election may see just 50 or 60 percent of voters show up. In this final section, we will talk about some of the causes and possible solutions for low turnout. Why Don't Americans Turn Out? Improving Voter Turnout

52 Why Don't Americans Turn Out?
12.6 Why Don't Americans Turn Out? When asked why they didn't make it to the polls, Americans have no shortage of reasons from which to draw. Many say they simply had other commitments, whether work or family, that kept them away from the polls. For others, the process of registering to vote is too complicated. The United States is one of the very few democracies that place the burden of registering on the citizen rather than on the government. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, commonly known as the Motor Voter Act, tried to lesson the burden by allowing people to register to vote at the DMV and other service agencies. Then there is the difficulty of voting itself; in 30 states, voters must show some form of ID. In nine of those states, that has to be a photo ID. Some Americans become overwhelmed by the sheer number of elections and thus don't vote. Voter attitude is also key; some voters may feel alienated, and others are simply apathetic or disturbed by the tone and tactics taken by campaigns. Finally, the political parties are not as effective as they used to be in mobilizing voters and getting them to the polls. Other Commitments Difficulty of Registration Difficulty of Voting Number of Elections Voter Attitudes Weakened Influence of Political Parties

53 12.6 FIGURE 12.5 Why don't people vote?
During November of each federal election year, the U.S. Census Bureau conducts a Current Population Survey that asks a series of questions related to voting and registration. Figure 12.5 shows how, in the November 2008 survey, respondents were asked whether they voted in the election and, if not, what their reasons were for not voting. The most common reason for not voting was being too busy. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, November 2008.

54 12.6 How do citizens vote by absentee ballot?
Citizens who will be unable to make it to the polls on Election Day may file an application to vote by absentee ballot. Local Boards of Elections mail ballots to these individuals; citizens fill out the ballot and return them by mail. Here, election officials sort and organize completed absentee ballots. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images News/Getty Images

55 Improving Voter Turnout
12.6 Improving Voter Turnout A number of solutions have been proposed to boost voter turnout. One is to make Election Day a national holiday, so that fewer people would have work scheduling conflicts. This could backfire, however, if people used it to extend a weekend holiday. Another suggestion is to enable early voting; in fact, 34 states already have some form of early voting. A downside to early voting is that voters might regret their choice if they hear new information about a candidate after they voted but before Election Day. Other suggestions include allowing mail and online voting. Mail-in ballots are already in use in many counties in Washington, California, and Oregon. And some states have begun experimenting with online voting. Further simplifying voter registration has been suggested, as has modernizing the ballot. The latter is intended to avoid the problems that surfaced in Florida in 2000 due to a poor ballot design. Finally, stronger political parties could improve voter turnout, but adopting reforms that would enable party strengthening, such as allowing for increases in finances, raise questions about the role of money in elections. Make Election Day a Holiday Enable Early Voting Permit Mail and Online Voting Make Registration Easier Modernize the Ballot Strengthen Parties

56 12.6 12.6 The most frequently cited reason Americans give for failing to vote is: Why don't Americans vote? Let's see what you have learned about the reasons for low voter turnout. Distrust in government and voter cynicism Overwhelming number of elections Difficulty with voter registration Conflicts with work or family

57 12.6 12.6 The most frequently cited reason Americans give for failing to vote is: The number one reason Americans give for failing to vote is that they are too busy with work and family conflicts. Distrust in government and voter cynicism Overwhelming number of elections Difficulty with voter registration Conflicts with work or family

58 12 Discussion Questions Why don't more Americans vote?
What changes to election procedures might increase voter turnout? What factors influence how Americans make their voting choices?

59 12 Further Review Listen to the Chapter
Study and Review the Flashcards Study and Review the Practice Tests


Download ppt "12 Elections and Voting Justin Hayworth/AP Images"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google