Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Faculty of Agricultural

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Faculty of Agricultural"— Presentation transcript:

1 Faculty of Agricultural
UTILIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL WASTE AND BIOLOGICAL AGENT TO INCREASE RICE YIELD Oktavia S Padmini R.R.R. Brotodjojo Faculty of Agricultural UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta

2 Indonesia is the third largest rice producers after China and India
(FAO, 2008).

3 PROBLEMS INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY LEVELLING OFF PRODUCTIVITY
Prioritize high production Increase the use of high doses of inorganic fertilizer and  ignore organic fertilizer  INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT POLICY Declining soil fertility and distracting soil ecosystem   Low fertilization efficiency Sensitive to pest & diseases LEVELLING OFF PRODUCTIVITY

4

5 RESEARCH METHODS The aims of this research is to determine the influence of the Liquid Organic Fertilizer types (LOF) on plant growth and rice yield. The experiment was done at Bener Village, Ngrampal District, Sragen Regency, from March until November 2011.

6 RESEARCH METHODS This research using single factor and 3 replications . It was arranged according to Randomized Completely Block Design with 5 replicates. The treatments were: LOF“Double”, LOF“Plus”, LOF“Bacteria”, LOF“Bacteria+Plus”, and (Control, no LOF) Control with inorganic fully, that is NPK fertilizer (450 kg/urea +200kg SP KCl) Treatment LOF with semi organic (combining between 1.5 ton/ha organic kg NPK fertilizers) ANOVA and DMRT at 5 % were subjected to the data

7 PRODUCING LIQUID ORGANIC FERTILIZER

8 Table 1. Effect of LOF usage on plant height age 20 to 60 days after transplanting (dat)
TREATMENT Plant height (cm) 20 dat 30 dat 40 dat 50 dat 60 dat LOF ”Ganda” 37,67 a 37,33 b 60,33 ab 79,67 ab 93,67 b ”Plus” 37,00 a 40,33 a 61,33 ab 81,33 ab 95,00 a ”Bakteri” 36,33 a 60,67 ab 80,33 ab 94,00 a ”Bakteri+Plus” 41,33 a 62,67 a 82,33 a 95,67 a Without LOF 31,67 b 35,33 b 59,00 b 78,00 b 92,67 b Note: Numbers followed by similar alphabet each column showed not significantly different at 95% level of confidence

9 Table 2. Effect of LOF usage on leaf number age 20 to 60 days after transplanting
TREATMENT Number of leaf 20 days 30 days 40 days 50 days 60 days LOF ”Ganda” 41,61 a 60,67 ab 122,67 ab ab 110,00 b ”Plus” 40,33 a 61.33 ab 122,33 ab 128,00 ab 112,67 a ”Bakteri” 30,33 a 120,67 b b 110,33 b ”Bakteri+Plus” 62,67 a a 132,33 a 113,00 a Without LOF 36,33 a 59,00 b 119, 33 b 123,33 b 109,67 b Note: Numbers followed by similar alphabet each column showed not significantly different at 95% level of confidence

10 Table 3. Effect of LOF application on yield components
TREATMENT Yield component Number of tiller Number of panicle Length of panicles (cm) Number of grain / panicle Un produc tillers % LOF ”Ganda” 23,33 ab 17,83 ab 25,67 ab 103,67 b 5,50 a ”Plus” 25,33 a 18,17 ab 26,00 a 135,67 a 5,83 a ”Bakteri” 21,67 b 25,17 b 133,00 ab 2,50 b ”Bakteri+Plus 26,50 a 19,83 a 26,17 a 137,00 a 2,17 b Without LOF 20,33 b 15,83 b 24,33 b 107,67 b 6.00 a Note: Numbers followed by similar alphabet each column showed not significantly different at 95% level of confidence

11 Table 4. Effect of LOF application on yield components
TREATMENT Yield component Weight of 1000 grain (g) Weight of grains per hill (g) Weight of grains per plot (g) Weight of grains/ha (ton) LOF ”Ganda” 25,67 a 35,70 b 1402,80 bc 7,07 bc ”Plus” 24,67 a 38,75 ab 1436,20 ab 7,18 ab ”Bakteri” 43,63 a ”Bakteri+Plus” 26,00 a 43,92 a 1536,40 a 7,68 a Without LOF 25,33 a 34,00 b 1302,60 c 6,52 c Note: Numbers followed by similar alphabet each column showed not significantly different at 95% level of confidence

12 CONCLUSION Additional application of LOF to NPK fertilizer resulted in the best growth and yield Application of various LOF did not significantly different among treatments. However, the greater result found with combining LOF bacteri+Plus treatment, and than followed by LOF Plus and LOF bacteri Additional application of LOF “Bacteria” and mixture of “Bacteria + Plus” to NPK fertilizer significantly reduced number of unproductive tillers.

13 THANK YOU

14 Liquid organic fertilizer
A product from the bio-fermentation of vegetables, fruits, and animal urine, coconut water, sprout of rice, fermented with molases and useful microbes. These microbes help to break down nutrients in the material, and making them a potentially valuable nutrient-rich organic source, such as proteins, amino acids, organic acids, major nutrients, minor nutrients, accelerating growth hormones, vitamins, and enzymes All of which are potentially useful for the efficient growth of plants

15 Liquid organic fertilizer (LOF)
LOF was contain Nitrogen (%) : 0,07 Phosphorus (ppm) : 231,89 Potassiun (ppm) : 1288,36 Mn (ppm) : 2,10 Zn (ppm) : 1,51 Mg (ppm) : 157,59 Fe (ppm) : 26,87 IAA (ppm) : 0,71 GA (ppm) : - (<0,52) Resulted from Lab Research analysis UGM Yogyakarta (Number 6517/LPPT-UGM/U/V/2012)

16 CONTENT OF LOR BACTERIAL

17 POTENSI OF LOF BACTERIAL

18 THE ROLE OF LIQUID ORGANIC FERTILIZERS
Bio stimulant Bioprotectan Biofertilizer extend the root surface Pest Resistensi increase nutrient availability to plants Increased absorption of nutrients and water Increase growth and rice yield quality

19 THE ROLE OF BACTEIAL FERTILIZERS
Mayor microbes secondary microbes Tersier microbes Provide  the elements N, P, K, Ca  Produce a food source for the proliferation s create ideal soil conditions Increased absorption of nutrients to plans Increase growth and rice yield


Download ppt "Faculty of Agricultural"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google