Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Working Memory and Language

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Working Memory and Language"— Presentation transcript:

1 Working Memory and Language
Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learning: The Role of Noticing, Input Enhancement and Working Memory Lucy Atkinson, Division of Psychology, Department of Social Sciences, University of Northampton Noticing Schmidt (1990, 1993, 2001) proposed the "noticing hypothesis” Used “intake” as the part of the present material (input) that is noticed by the learner Input Enhancement Noticing coined the future for IE - grammatical forms enhanced into more engaging visual forms Engaging (and noticeable) visual forms lead learners to learn target forms. Input does not always become intake (Nassaji & Fotos, 2010; Schmidt, 1993) Working Memory and Language WM correlates positively with reading comprehension (Juffs & Harrington, 2011), syntactic processing (Miyake & Friedman, 1998), and vocabulary learning (Juffs, 2006) Harrington (2004) - unusual if the same relationship was not found in input processing i.e. IE being one form of input processing Master’s Research (2011) The Impact of Textual Enhancement and the Relationship with Working Memory in Chinese Second Language Students’ Learning of the English Article System Results Input Enhancement Findings Working Memory Findings The project aimed to look at the effectiveness of textual enhancement, and the relationship with working memory measures (reading span and backwards digit span), on second language acquisition of the English Article System by Chinese students. Mean Scores on Pre-test and Post-test of Form Correction Scores, for all Three Study Conditions. N = 20 per Study Condition, Total N = 60. Graph to Illustrate the Form Correction Scores for all Three Study Conditions and Working Memory Reading Span Scores. N = 20 for Each Group Method: Chinese Masters students with IELTS ≥ 6.5 PRE-TEST STUDY POST-TEST d = 0.13 (0.88, 2.71) d = 0.92 (-1.63, 0.93) d = 0.0 (-0.58, 0.58) The Life of William Shakespeare William Shakespeare was baptized April 26, 1564, in Stratford-upon-Avon, England. From roughly 1594 onward he was an important member of the Lord Chamberlain’s Men company of theatrical players. Written records give little indication of the way in which Shakespeare’s professional life moulded his artistry. All that can be deduced is that over the course of 20 years, Shakespeare wrote plays that capture the complete range of human emotion and Unenhanced d is calculated on the mean difference between pre and post-test scores. CIs are for 95% CI for each study condition. Reliable improvement through IE occurs when WM RS is higher, thus supporting the hypothesis in the current study. Although this should be interpreted with caution as the Ns were very small for the lower WM RS scores (e.g. N = 4 for WM RS score = 3). WM score categories were very unbalanced - bulk of WM test scores were at 5 (N= 27) or 6 (N = 19).Through small N cells - standard errors become large (illustrated above) Reasonable to assume that the very small Ns may have contributed to the non-significant result. Mean Scores on Pre-test and Post-test of Grammatical Judgement Task, for all Three Study Conditions. N = 20 per Study Condition, Total N = 60. By the early 1590s, documents show William Shakespeare was a managing partner in the Lord Chamberlain's Men, an acting company in London. After the crowning of King James I, in 1603, the company changed its name to the King's Men. From all accounts, the King's Men company was very popular, and records show that Shakespeare had works published and sold as popular literature. The theatre culture in 16th-century England was not highly admired by people Enhanced Research questions: What impact does TE have on student’s acquisition of the English article system (the target form) as measured by the form correction task and the GJT? What is the relationship between working memory and benefits when learning with textual enhancement in L2 learners? Grammatical Judgement Task Form Correction Grammatical Judgement Task Form Correction d = 0.16 (-0.65, 1.35) d = 0.90 (0.6192, 1.98) d = 0.15 (-0.42, 0.82) Control NO TEXT Discussion/Conclusion Overall, students in enhanced study condition did appear to gain a better acquisition of the form Merely reading the text produced higher acquisition scores compared to the control group Tentatively, input enhancement in this case did promote noticing Study was small scale, and does not produce fully generalisable conclusions Provided insights of how TE can affect learner’s subsequent target form learning Learner’s characteristics and extensive learning of English of over 13 years, this finding of TE effectiveness is promising and adds support for previous TE studies which found the IE method to be effective Non-significant relationships between WMC and noticing (through TE) suggest scholars are aware of the merits of WM Positive steps being taken to uncover the impact of WM as an ID on SLA Also: Reading Proficiency WM: Backwards digit span WM: Reading span (in English) Form Correction Grammatical Judgement Task in this test, there are two parts please read the instructions and fill in where required try to write down something each time you are asked and make sure your answers are written clearly  Begin  now, please decide whether these sentences are True (T) OR False (F). do they make sense? Children in Italy go to the school when they are 6. I want to go to the university in California. read the sentence numbered, and then choose ONE correct sentence form tick the box for the correct sentence please try to provide a response for each question  Begin I watched the football match last night as I have recently began to enjoy football. I watched a match last night as I recently began to enjoy football. Now I enjoy football I watched an match. I watched football match last night as I have recently began to enjoy football. I watched match last night as I recently began to enjoy the football. PRE-TEST AND POST-TEST PROPOSED RESEARCH FOR PhD Working Title: Cognitive Processes in Second Language Learning: The Role of Noticing, Input Enhancement and Working Memory Proposed Experiments Experiments 1-3 INPUT ENHANCEMENT Experiments 4-5 WORKING MEMORY AND ATTENTION Question Who What Aims 1 Effects with younger, less experience students 15-18 year old Chinese students in China (natural first language setting) Similar to above (masters research) +RULES +COMPREHENSION 4 Investigate predictive value of different working memory tests (in L1 or L2) Proposed Research Investigate whether “noticing” (input becoming intake) is required for second language learning how effective is input enhancement for second language learners, and what factors can impact on the effect input enhancement has? To uncover methodologies and measures used in second language acquisition research with a working memory component and suggest a robust, useful measure for empirical studies researching working memory in second language studies Effects with different types of input enhancement Chinese pre-sessional students in the UK Similar to above +Different types of Input Enhancement +Audio and visual The contributions working memory capacity makes to other L2 tasks 2 5 The contribution working memory capacity makes to input enhancement effectiveness Native Chinese speakers Similar to above +Added working memory load 3 Overall aims of the research: understand the contribution of working memory and attention to a second language learning task; explore ways to better direct learning resources i.e. attention and working memory to the learning process; to document effects of reduced and increased cognitive resources in learning tasks.


Download ppt "Working Memory and Language"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google