Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrianna Greene Modified over 7 years ago
1
Presented by: Ms. KAMINI GUPTA CSIR-Central Road Research Institute
PROVISION OF SUSTAINABLE ROAD TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURES: A CASE STUDY OF URBAN CORRIDOR IN DELHI Presented by: Ms. KAMINI GUPTA CSIR-Central Road Research Institute New Delhi, India Authored by: Ms. Kamini gupta, Dr. Ch. Ravi sekhar, Dr. B. Kanaga Durai & Dr. Ravindra Kumar 15th International conference foe women Engineers & Scientists, Adelaide Convention Centre, Adelaide, Australia, 19th-22nd July, 2011
2
Outline of the Presentation
Introduction Sustainable Transportation System & its necessity Study area Characteristics Identified Problems in the Study Area Methods of Data Collection Data Analysis and Discussion Provision of Various Infrastructure facilities Evaluation of sustainability under various strategies Driving Cycle Patterns & Fuel Consumed Conclusions and Recommendation
3
Introduction on Sustainable Transportation Measures
Social: Reduce Congestion: improve mobility and reliability Enhance Safety: reduce crash rates and traffic incidents Economic: Expand Economic Opportunity: Optimise land use and improve vehicular movement Preserve Value of Transportation Assets: maintain pavement condition, capacity addition etc Environmental: Improve Air Quality: reduce green house gas emissions Ref: NCHRP 8-74 and Zietsman Josias et.al 2008
4
Necessity of the Present Study
No quantitative research and implementation of sustainable transportation infrastructures concept for road networks. To evaluate sustainability of road transportation system for current and future transportation system scenarios.
5
Objective of the Study To evaluate sustainability of road transportation system by Provision of Various Road Infrastructures.
6
Applications of Sustainable Measures
Route Guidance Travel Time Information Sustainable Transportation system Measures Commuters Transportation System Planners/ Policy Makers Freight Operators Road Network Operations Road Network Planning Routing Scheduling
7
Review of Travel Time Reliability Measures
Statistical Measures Standard deviation , and Travel time window. Coefficient of variation Reliability Measures 95th or 90th % Travel Time: Travel time on some of the heaviest traffic days.
8
Case Study - Urban Corridor on NH 2
Study Area: Urban Corridor on NH 2 ( Ashram Jn. to Apollo Hospital)
9
Study Area Characteristics
The total Traffic Volume (both directions) of this corridor near CRRI is about 1,37,569 vehicles per day. ( CRRI Report 2009). Badarpur to Ashram direction was observed bit more than the other direction ( vehicles). On an average 7% of the total traffic was observed during morning peak hours and evening peak hours. This indicates that during the periods from 9.00 am to 8.00 pm the travel time is very uncertain because of high amount of traffic. In this study mainly emphasized for measuring the travel time variability for the morning hours 8.30am to 10.30am and 4.00pm to 6.00pm. Traffic Composition (Badarpur to Ashram ) Traffic Composition (Ashram to Badarpur) Time versus Percentage of Total Traffic
10
Definition of Problems in the Study Area
Section 1: From Ashram Chowk to Grandly Junction ( about 1.50 km length) Intersection Spacing: Two signalized junctions are with in km road stretch. The spacing between these signals is about km. Traffic Incidents: Signal failures, vehicle breakdown, cleaning, marking etc during rush hours. Right turning traffic: Traffic behavior at Matamandir Intersection and Grand lay Intersection.
11
Problem definitions in the study Area
Section 2: From Grandly Junction to CRRI Bus Stop ( 1.40 Km length) Merging and Diverging behavior: at Modi Mill flyover Pedestrian crossing: Crossing at un pedestrian signal Bus Stops: Unauthorized bus stop near merging of the ramp on NH2 U turn: Medium and Large size buses taking U turn in front of CRRI median opening from inner lane during rush our.
12
Problem definitions in the study Area
Section 3: From CRRI Bus Stop to Apollo Hospital ( Length 1.4 Km) Pedestrian crossing: High number of Pedestrian crossing during peak hours at signalized junctions in front of CRRI (often manually operated at this signal) Pedestrian signal : Specially at Okhla tank, traffic stops for 12 sec creating congestion during peak hours Location of Bus Stops: Location of CRRI Bus stop is immediately after junction.
13
Structure of Travel Time (TT) Fluctuation for Study Area
Demand Side Factors With in day and day-to-day demand fluctuation External Factors TT Fluctuation adverse weather Supply Side Factors vehicle Break down, traffic accident, signal failure, roads works, pedestrian crossing at unsignalised location etc.
14
Examining Travel Time Reliability on Urban Corridor of NH 2 (Ashram to Apollo)
Traffic Flow Traffic Flow
15
Data Collection Travel Time Estimation (Direct Measurements)
Moving Car Methods (Traditional) : 25th Aug 2009 and 26th Aug 2009 Licence Plate Matching Techniques: 24th Aug 2009 to 28th Aug 2009 and 12th October 2009 to 16th October 2009 Probe Vehicle techniques: (GPS fitted Vehicle): 31Aug 2010 to 2 Sep 2010 and 23rd Jan 2011 to 27th Jan 2011 Traffic Incident Survey: 24th Aug 2009 to 28th Aug 2009 Traffic Accidents Road Works Vehicle Breakdown Cleaning and Falling objects
16
Travel Time Estimation - Moving Car Method
Delay due to events (seconds) Time Travel Time (min) Signal Signal failure Merging and pedestrian C/s Day 1 8.30am 7.00 64 Day 2 6.00 24 8.54am 10.00 155 9.00am 9.00 30 90 51 9.45am 11.00 160 10.05 140 13 Moving car data useful estimate average travel time and delay when there is no uncertainty conditions. The limitation of moving car method is sample size, therefore the travel time estimation by this method are unable to explain travellers experience on the study area.
17
Travel Time Estimation- License Plate Method
Minimum travel time on all the time periods is around 7 minutes. Travel Time highly varies between the morning peak hour 9.00 am and am. Explains that the need travel time uncertainty analysis
18
Statistical Measures- SD and Cv
Morning Hours: SD values are higher (around 7minutes) for the vehicles enter after 9.00 am in the study corridor. Cv values becomes larger for the vehicles enter after am and before am in the morning peak hour
19
Statistical Measures- SD and cv
Evening Hours SD value during evening peak hours varies between 5 and 7 minutes. In the evening hours the Cv varies approximately 0.4 to 0.55 for the entire period.
20
Travel Time Reliability Measures-PT&PTI
Morning hours, before 9.00 am the planning time is around 12 minutes where as between 9.00 am to am is around 25 minutes. Vehicle enter after 9am has to plan double the travel time to reach the destination in time. In the evening hours the planning time is approximately 20 minutes for all the time intervals
21
Travel Time Reliability Measures-BT&BTI
Clear peak values in BT and BTI was observed between am and am. Highest BI value i.e. 1.0 observed during morning period between 9.00 am and 9.15am. Travellers should budget an additional 12 minutes buffer for 25 minutes planning to ensure 90% on time arrival at the destination.
22
Statistical Summary of Travel Time
(Time units in minutes) Just before peak (830 am to 900am) (Sample Size 94) Peak Period (900 am to 1000am) (Sample Size 217) Just After Peak Period (10am-1030am) (Sample Size 56) Minimum Travel Time 6 Mean Travel Time 8.63 13.13 12.13 Median Travel Time 7 10 11 Maximum Travel Time 29 37 33 Variance 14.73 50.40 20.51 Std. Deviation 3.84 7.10 4.53 Coef. of Variation 0.45 0.54 0.37
23
Travel Time Distribution
Just before morning peak period 830 am to 900 am Just after peak 10.00 am to 1030 am Morning peak period 9.00 am to am Goodness-of-fit summary for various distributions Sl.No Type of Distribution Just before peak period 830am to 900 am During peak Period 900 am to 1000 am Just after peak period 1000 am to 1030 am Anderson-Darling test 1 Burr 4.346 2.898 0.713 2 Gen. Extreme Value (GEV) 5.528 4.541 1.256 3 Log-Logistic 4.291 4.146 0.757 4 Lognormal 4.555 4.872 1.304 5 Gamma 11.322 14.620 3.199 6 Normal 13.809 22.711 4.403 From AD test it can be identified that Log-Logistic is the best fit for just before peak period and Burr distribution is best fit for peak period and just after peak period.
24
Operational Efficiency of Urban Corridor on NH2
Time Period Sample Size Statistical Measures Reliability Measures Congestion Measure Std Cov PT (95%) PT (90%) PTI BT BTI TTI Operational Efficiency of NH2 (From Km 8 to Km 12) - Urban Corridor 43 2.92 0.36 16.1 11.9 2.0 3.7 45% 1.37 51 4.46 0.50 17.6 12.8 2.1 3.9 43% 1.54 61 7.63 0.64 32.1 24.4 4.1 12.6 106% 1.85 76 6.90 0.53 26.7 24.9 4.2 11.8 90% 1.70 45 6.16 0.44 27.0 10.8 77% 1.80 35 7.59 0.54 28.1 26.3 4.4 12.2 87% 1.93 28 6.01 0.47 19.0 3.2 6.3 49% 1.90 2.31 0.20 13.9 13.8 2.3 2.4 21% 1.89 95th % travel time for urban corridor is varies between 3.45 to 8 min per km during morning peak hour. This value for rural corridor varies between 1.5 to 1.74 min per km in rural section on NH2.
25
Reliability Measures Vs Congestion Measures
Severity order of congestion represented by the congestion index (TTI) may not be consistently followed with that of reliability index. Travel time reliability measures are capable of measuring the variability in congestion level.
26
Speed Profile during Morning Hours (Survey Period : 31st Aug 2010 to 2nd Sep 2010)
Speed Profile of the Urban Study Corridor at 915 am Speed Profile of the Urban Study Corridor at 830 am Mata Mandir Jn Grand lay Okhla mode Okhla Tank Apollo CRRI Mata mandir Jn Grand lay Okhla mode CRRI Okhla Tank Apollo Speed Profile of the Urban Study Corridor at am Mata Mandir Jn Grand lay Okhla mode CRRI Okhla Tank Apollo
27
Speed and Flow profile on working days and non working day at 8.15 am
Speed and Fuel Flow Profile using Probe Vehicle (survey Period: 23rd Jan 2011 to 27th Jan 2011) Speed and Flow profile on working days and non working day at 8.15 am The travel time on working as well as non working day for the direction of Ashram to Apollo and the opposite direction at 8.15am is varies between 7.3 minutes to 7.7 minutes. The average fuel consumption for each direction is about 390 ml.(diesel)
28
Speed and Fuel Flow Profile using Probe Vehicle
Speed and Flow profile on working days and non working day at 9.10 am The travel time on non working day for the direction of Ashram to Apollo and the opposite direction at 9.10am is about 6.5 min and 8.5 min and the fuel consumption is about 380ml and 390 ml respectively The travel time on working day as for the direction of Ashram to Apollo and the opposite direction at 9.10am is about 11.2min and 14min and the fuel consumption is about 435 ml and 477ml respectively
29
Speed and Fuel Flow Profile using Probe Vehicle
Speed and Flow profile on working days and non working day at 10.00am The travel time on non working for the direction of Ashram to Apollo and the opposite direction at 10.00am is about 7.0 min and 9.4 min and the fuel consumption is about 355ml and 410 ml respectively The travel time on working as for the direction of Ashram to Apollo and the opposite direction at 10.00am is about 13.0 min and 20 min and the fuel consumption is about 465 ml and 570 ml respectively
30
Modeling Travel Time Variability
Traffic Flow Traffic Flow
31
Modeling Travel Time Variation
Variation of travel time during the study period is mainly due to traffic flow variation, delay due to traffic signal and pedestrians interruption to main traffic at un-signalized pedestrian crossing near Okhla Mode Bus Stop. Time Period Average delay due to Traffic Signals (sec) 44 167 212 183 about 146 pedestrians were crossing in every 15 minutes interval at this location during morning hours. on an average about 3minutes delay in 15minutes interval of time
32
Modeling Approach- Stochastic Simulation
Stochastic Response Surface Method (SRSM) Y = a0 + a1ξ1 + a2ξ2 + a3(ξ12-1) + a4(ξ22-1) + a5ξ1ξ2
33
Table Uncertainty ranges of model parameter and response variable
SRSM Analysis Continuous random variable such as Traffic Volume and Pedestrian Volume was considered for SRSM to model travel time distribution. Table Uncertainty ranges of model parameter and response variable Parameter Traffic volume (PCU/15min) Pedestrian Volume (persons/15min) Travel time (seconds) Minimum value 748 83 480 Maximum value 930 206 1080 Average Value 865 140 729 Standard deviation 49 32 135.6 Distribution type Lognormal Distribution parameter
34
SRSM Analysis Contd.. Lognormal Distribution for Traffic Volume Lognormal Distribution for Pedestrian Volume Lognormal Distribution Parameters and 0.058 KS Statistic , AD Statistic Lognormal Distribution Parameters and 0.236 KS Statistic , AD Statistic To check validity of the assumption Goodness of fit test was done by considering Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test and Anderson-Darling (AD) test. Results indicates that no difference between empirical and theoretical cumulative distributions. Lognormal distribution was considered for generating the random data for traffic volume and pedestrian volume respectively in SRSM model.
35
Modeling Travel Time Variation
Model Coefficients Estimated by SRSM a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 Coefficie nts 754.83 75.33 7.41 2.22 0.722 0.1
36
Provision of sustainable Infrastructure
Main contribution factor for travel time uncertainty during study period is demand side variation i. e. about 70% and remaining is due to capacity side variation. The goal/ target for provision of sustainable infrastructure is to reduce traffic volume impact on the study area by providing suitable infrastructure facilities. Following are the provisions of infrastructure to improve travel time uncertainty which provides the sustainable system for the corridor
37
Different options Option 1: Providing following Provisions Provision 1: Provision of subway at two locations (Modi mill flyover and Okhla Tank) Provision 2 : Provision of underpass at Grandly Junction and Provision of signal closing at Mata Mandir. Provision 3 : Provision of additional Lane from on ramp to ashram as space is available (lane extension) Option 2 : Introducing New Mode (at grade )in the Median ( From ….. To Apolo Metro Station)
38
Provision of Subway at Okhla Mode
Providing Subway at Okhla mode the average speed at this section( 200mts) will improve from 10 kmph to 35 kmph. This leads to saving of 30 sec to 60 each of each passenger during morning and evening peak hours. This also saves the fuel consumption approximately 700 lts per hour. ( approximately saves 10.5 crors per year ) Travel time reliability of the corridor will also be improved ( to be estimated)
39
Provision of Underpass
Providing underpass (facility providing for NMT) at Okhla Tank and closing pedestrian signal will improve the average speed at this section (200 mts) from 20 kmph to 40 kmph. This will leads to saving of an average of 30 sec of each passenger during morning and evening peak hours. This also saves the fuel consumption approximately 280 lts per hour. ( approximately saves 4.5 crors per year ) Travel time reliability of the corridor will also be improved ( to be estimated) Further banning of U turn at CRRI Signal will be improved the aveage section speed from 10 kmph to 30 kmph
40
Provision of Slopped Subway
Providing underpass for straight traffic from Badrpur to ashram will improve the average speed at this section (200 mts) from 10 kmph to 40 kmph. This will leads to saving of an average of 60 sec of each passenger during morning and evening peak hours. This also saves the fuel consumption approximately 480 lts per hour ( approximately saves 24 crors per year ) Travel time reliability of the corridor will also be improved ( to be estimated) Further banning of U turn at CRRI Signal will be improved the aveage section speed from 10 kmph to 30 kmph
41
Provision of additional lane contd..
Provision 1: Provision of Under passes at locations (Modi mill and Okhla Tank) Provision 2 : Provision of Subway at Grandly Junction and Provision of signal closing at Mata Mandir. Provision 3 : Provision of additional Lane, ( starting from on ramp to ashram free left turn ,Space is available)
42
Guidance Provided to various Students
Related Publications Dr.Ch.Ravi Sekhar, Dr. B.K Durai, A.Mohan Rao and K.Sitaramanjaneyulu “Toll System Design based on Travel Time Reliability for High Speed Corridors” , IRC PPP seminar, Indian Habitate Center, New Delhi, 28th &29th Aug 2009 Dr.S.Gangopadyay, Dr. Ch.Ravi Sekhar and Dr.B.Kanaga Durai “ Travel Time Reliability Measurement for an urban Corridor-Acase Study”, Indian Highways , May 2010. Dr.Ch.Ravi Sekhar, Dr.B.Kanaga Durai and Dr.S. Gangopadhyay” Modeling Travel Time Variation under Uncertainties: A Case Study of Urban Corridor in Delhi, Conference on Infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning 2010) October 18-20, 2010 (CD ROM) Dr.Ch.Ravi Sekhar, Dr.B.Kanaga Durai and Dr.S. Gangopadhyay “Examining Travel Time Distribution of Urban and Rural Corridor of National Highway in India”, Easter Asia Socity for Tansportation Studies 2011, submited on 7th October 2010 for Journal section. Ms Kamini Gupta, Dr.Ch.Ravi Sekhar, Dr.Ravider Kumar and Dr.B.Kangadurai “ Road Transport Infrastructures provisions for Sustainabile Transportation System” Abstract Accepted for Women conference Guidance Provided to various Students In-Plant Summer Training (Two M.E Students ) Master Thesis (Association with Anna University - On going ) Extension of this Work Proposal selected for CSIR EMPOWER Project.
43
Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.