Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 2. Comparative efficacy of thromboprophylaxis interventions in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). (A) Estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95%

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Fig. 2. Comparative efficacy of thromboprophylaxis interventions in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). (A) Estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95%"— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 2. Comparative efficacy of thromboprophylaxis interventions in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). (A) Estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for DVT from network meta-analysis for different thromboprophylaxis interventions, according to a Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects model. The circles and horizontal lines indicate pair-wise OR and 95% CrI, respectively. (B) Rank probability of each treatment arm for the risk of DVT. The number on the horizontal axis is the possible rank of each treatment, from best to worst according to the outcome. The size of each bar corresponds to the probability of each treatment being at a specific rank. LMWH = low-molecular-weight heparin, IPC = intermittent pneumatic compression, UFH = unfractionated heparin. Fig. 2. Comparative efficacy of thromboprophylaxis interventions in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). (A) Estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) for DVT from network meta-analysis for different thromboprophylaxis interventions, according to a Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects model. The circles and horizontal lines . . . J Korean Med Sci Nov;31(11):


Download ppt "Fig. 2. Comparative efficacy of thromboprophylaxis interventions in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). (A) Estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95%"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google