Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBernice Bradford Modified over 6 years ago
1
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
High Field Superconducting Magnet Program at Fermilab: R&D for magnets at the 16 T dipole frontier Tengming Shen for Alexander Zlobin and High Field Magnet Program at Fermilab At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders, June 14-17, 2015, Shanghai
2
Present record – 13.8 T in ~35 mm aperture (HD2, LBNL, 2008)
Magnet target parameters for 100-Tev class proton-proton colliders: FCC and SppC FCC B / G (T) / (T/m) Bpeak (T) Bore (mm) Length (units x m) MB 16 16.4 50 4500 x 14.3 MQ 450 13 800 x 6 MQX 225 100 D1 12 60 4x2 x 12 D2 10 10.5 4x3 x 10 Inter-aperture distance ≈ 250 mm; Yoke diameter ≤ 700 mm; Stray field ≤ 100 mT SppC Collision energy B (T) Bore (mm) Circumference (km) 71.2 TeV 12 40-50 80 20 50 Present record – 13.8 T in ~35 mm aperture (HD2, LBNL, 2008)
3
FNAL HFM Program FNAL HFM R&D plan was coordinated with recent P5 recommendations and updated DOE-HEP GARD program Recommendation 24: “Participate in global conceptual design studies and critical path R&D for future very high-energy proton-proton colliders. Continue to play a leadership role in superconducting magnet technology focused on the dual goals of increasing performance and decreasing costs.” In collaboration with the U.S. National laboratories, universities and industry Develop accelerator magnets with world record parameters Small-aperture 15 T Nb3Sn dipole, suitable for FCC, and 2 T HTS insert Large-aperture 15 T Nb3Sn dipole and 5+ T HTS insert with stress management Small-aperture 20 T accelerator dipole based on LTS (Nb3Sn) and HTS (Bi-2212 or YBCO) coils Perform magnet cost optimization studies. Continue superconductor and structural material R&D for T accelerator magnets.
4
FNAL HFM Program Timeline
VLHC HL-LHC LARP FCC Record field 13.8 T HFDA HFDM-LM mm Dipole mirror 10 T dipole TQC TQM-LQM 90 mm 200 T/m Quadrupole quadrupole mirror HFDC (R&W) 40 mm 10 T dipole MBHDP 60 mm 11 T dipole MBHSP MBHSM 60 mm 11 T dipole Dipole mirror FY15-17: Focus on 15 T Nb3Sn dipole demonstrator
5
Magnet Design Choice Coil design: Technology: W&R, R&W
RD3c (LBNL), 10 T, W&R, 2003 DCC017 (BNL), 10 T, R&W, 2007 HFDC (FNAL), ~6 T, R&W, 2004 Coil design: cos-theta block-type common coil Technology: W&R, R&W Mechanical structure: with and w/o collar Stainless Steel or Al shell stress management Field range: T 13.8 T - record since 2008 Focus on the cos-theta (shell-type) design w/o collar MBHSP (FNAL) 11.6 T, MBHDP (FNAL) 11.5 T, 2015 HFDA (FNAL) 10 T, D20 (LBNL), 13.4 T, 1997 HD2 (LBNL), 13.8 T, 2008
6
General considerations
1.9 K Magnet field B ~ λJ×w Bmax~λJc(Bmax,T,…)×w Small aperture dipole (~50 mm) Quench protection: Coil enthalpy can absorb the stored energy in <50% of the coil volume with Tmax=250 K Coil maximum azimuthal stress is ~150 Mpa
7
Strand and Cable Strand Cable R&D RRP 127, 169 or 217
Strand ID – 1 and 0.7 mm Jc(12T, 4.2K) ~2700 A/mm2 Cable N=28 (HFDA) N=40 (MBH) Ic degradation ~5% stainless steel core cable prototypes are available R&D increase Jc(15 T, 4.2 K) increase strand D, cable width reduce filament size RRP RRP RRP-217 Parameter 28-strand 40-strand Number of strands 28 40 Mid-thickness, mm 1.870 1.319 Width, mm 15.10 Keystone angle, deg 0.805
8
Coil Design Study Coil aperture: 60 mm
Coil cross-section: 4 layers, graded Design parameters: Bmax, field quality, coil volume, az. stress Design choice: 4L-5 – minimal coil size and stress
9
15 T Dipole Demonstrator Design concept: Design fields:
Coil bore: 60-mm Coil length: 1 m Optimized design: 4-layer graded coil Interim design: with 11 T coil Cold iron yoke Design fields: Jc(15T, 4.2K)=1.35 kA/mm2 Coil Bmax= 16.3/15.2 T at 4.3 K Bore Bmax= 15.6/14.6 T at 4.3 K + ~1.5 T at 1.9 K Additional margin – higher Jc Optimized graded coil Interim coil design
10
Mechanical Design Lorentz forces Structure: Protection heaters:
Horizontal support Structure: Thin stainless steel coil-yoke spacer Vertically split yoke Stainless steel clamps Bolted skin (from 11 T dipole) Cold mass length: 1 m Cold mass OD<610 mm (VMTF) Protection heaters: Outer-layer Inter-layer (2-3) Up to 80% of coil volume
11
Demonstration of 15-16 T field level Study and optimization of
Test goals Demonstration of T field level Study and optimization of magnet quench performance training, degradation, memory, effect of coil pre-load ramp rate sensitivity operation margin quench protection heater efficiency, radial quench propagation, coil quench temperature field quality geometrical harmonics, coil magnetization, iron saturation, dynamic effects
12
FNAL 15 T 2-in-1 Demonstrator Parameters
Number of apertures 2 Aperture(mm) 60 Aperture spacing (mm) 250 Coil current (A) 11100 Operating temperature (K) 4.3 Max bore field at 4.3 K (T) 16.48 Max coil field at 4.3 K (T) 16.96 Margin along the load line Stored energy (MJ/m) TBD Inductance (mH/m) Yoke ID (mm) 190.8 Yoke OD (mm) 650 1 m diameter “cryostat” envelope
13
Cost reduction strategy:
Magnet Cost Reduction B. Palmer (BNL), 2014 Cost reduction strategy: Reduce magnet cross-section cold mass (coil, structure) cryostat Increase magnet length 15 m => 20 m Reduce component cost superconductor (use NbTi in low fields) structural components Reduce labor number of coil layers Improve performance Bop, Top
14
Conclusion Future p-p colliders needs cost-effective main dipole magnets with nominal operation fields of ~16 T based on Nb3Sn technology Special magnets with operation fields up to 20+ T based on HTS/LTS coils By 2018, demonstration of 16-T-class accelerator quality dipole is a key milestone FNAL has a promising dipole design and a plan to achieve this milestone by 2018 Design Bmax is above 17 with conservative Jc Accelerator quality features Issues to be understood and resolved demonstration of T nominal field and accelerator class parameters, improvement of magnet training, reduction of conductor degradation, magnet cost optimization
15
Infrastructure Use the 11 T dipole components, tooling, and FNAL fabrication and test infrastructure => R&D cost and time reduction
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.