Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SWITCHING TO INNOVATIVE STRATEGY: THE PHANTOM MENACE

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SWITCHING TO INNOVATIVE STRATEGY: THE PHANTOM MENACE"— Presentation transcript:

1 SWITCHING TO INNOVATIVE STRATEGY: THE PHANTOM MENACE
Angel Barajas Elena Shakina

2 Motivation Intuition Previous studies
one can observe different strategies of companies on the same market some companies introduce innovations others follow innovative leaders under turbulent conditions companies might change their behavior Previous studies Cincera et al., 2011 European project - R&D in crisis Archibugia et al., 2012 Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation? Zouaghi et al., 2015 Has the global financial crisis had different effects on innovation performance in the agri-food sector by comparison to the rest of the economy?

3 Motivation In the paper “Status quo vs new strategy in intangibles” we have developed a theoretical model found out that a company decides to switch to intangible-intensive strategy under certain conditions formulated a golden rule – optimal investment when maximum value is reached on the next step is interesting to learn about real patterns of companies' strategic behavior reveal switching to innovative strategy learn about drivers of this switching and its consequences

4 Research Questions Do companies switch to innovative strategy when performance of the “status quo” strategy is high? Do companies switch in favorable environment – stable economic conditions? Is switching to innovative strategy reasonable in crisis?

5 Research strategy 1st stage
identify companies that switch to innovative strategy investment in R&D resulted in IA increase 2nd stage find out factors that drive companies to switch (increase probability of switching) factors related to previous performance economic conditions: crisis/prosperity 3rd stage examine corporate performance after switching whether new innovative strategy brings greater return on average whether this effect is sensitive to the time chosen to switch

6 Pr y it =1 = exp α i +β∙ X it 1+ exp α i +β∙ X it ,
Methodology Identification of switching if intangible assets increase: any increase, 25% increase, 50% increase, 75% increase, doubling if a company invested in R&D in 1 or 2 years before Estimation of the probability to switch yit- switching to innovative strategy Xit-vector of factors: profit from the “status quo” strategy, crisis, size effect Estimation of the moderation effects of switching to innovative strategy 𝑦 𝑖𝑡= 𝛼 𝑖 + 𝛽∙𝑥 𝑖𝑡 +𝛾∙ 𝑥 𝑖𝑡 ∙ 𝑧 𝑖𝑡 +𝜇∙ 𝑥 𝑖𝑡 ∙ 𝑧 𝑖𝑡 ∙ 𝑡 𝑐 , yit- performance indicator xit- intangible assets in previous year zit-dummy variable: switching tc-dummy variable: crisis Pr y it =1 = exp α i +β∙ X it exp α i +β∙ X it ,

7 Data 1000 listed Russian companies observed from 2004 till 2014
corporate performance, items of the balance sheet, intangible resources financial reports, annual reports, crawling of corporate webpages and sources of analytical agencies

8 Switching by years

9 Results: probability of switching
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) VARIABLES switch switch25 switch50 switch75 switch100 Lagged EVA 6.71e-05 7.37e-05 7.35e-05 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Book value -5.39e-05 8.69e-05 9.99e-05 (5.77e-05) (6.20e-05) (6.82e-05) (8.59e-05) (8.92e-05) Crisis -3.675*** -3.603*** -3.436*** -3.993*** -3.912*** (0.587) (0.714) (0.713) (1.005) Observations 2,274 1,583 1,451 1,333 1,239

10 Results: moderation effect of switching to innovative strategy in crisis

11 Results: moderation effect of switching
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVA Lagged intangible assets 0.193*** 0.293*** 0.259*** 0.257*** (0.0371) (0.0366) (0.0362) (0.0361) (0.0369) Crisis -1.224 -2.567 -5.179 -4.765 -3.521 (6.300) (6.318) (6.253) (6.243) (6.068) Book Value 0.0460*** 0.0476*** 0.0558*** 0.0561*** 0.0354*** ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of switching (25%) 1.234*** (0.187) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (25%) -6.261*** (0.353) Moderation effect of switching (50%) 3.245*** (0.219) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (50%) -5.218*** (0.392) Moderation effect of switching (75%) -38.83*** (1.878) Moderation effect of switching (100%) -41.00*** (1.932) Moderation effect of switching 2.160*** (0.0734) Moderation effect of switching in crisis -1.765*** (0.201) Constant -16.60*** -19.66*** -22.20*** -22.63*** -10.97*** (3.120) (3.118) (3.085) (3.081) (3.017) Observations 8,141 R-squared 0.183 0.179 0.195 0.198 0.243 Results: moderation effect of switching Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

12 Results: moderation effect of switching
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVA Lagged intangible assets 0.193*** 0.293*** 0.259*** 0.257*** (0.0371) (0.0366) (0.0362) (0.0361) (0.0369) Crisis -1.224 -2.567 -5.179 -4.765 -3.521 (6.300) (6.318) (6.253) (6.243) (6.068) Book Value 0.0460*** 0.0476*** 0.0558*** 0.0561*** 0.0354*** ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of switching (25%) 1.234*** (0.187) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (25%) -6.261*** (0.353) Moderation effect of switching (50%) 3.245*** (0.219) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (50%) -5.218*** (0.392) Moderation effect of switching (75%) -38.83*** (1.878) Moderation effect of switching (100%) -41.00*** (1.932) Moderation effect of switching 2.160*** (0.0734) Moderation effect of switching in crisis -1.765*** (0.201) Constant -16.60*** -19.66*** -22.20*** -22.63*** -10.97*** (3.120) (3.118) (3.085) (3.081) (3.017) Observations 8,141 R-squared 0.183 0.179 0.195 0.198 0.243 Results: moderation effect of switching Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

13 Results: moderation effect of switching
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVA Lagged intangible assets 0.193*** 0.293*** 0.259*** 0.257*** (0.0371) (0.0366) (0.0362) (0.0361) (0.0369) Crisis -1.224 -2.567 -5.179 -4.765 -3.521 (6.300) (6.318) (6.253) (6.243) (6.068) Book Value 0.0460*** 0.0476*** 0.0558*** 0.0561*** 0.0354*** ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of switching (25%) 1.234*** (0.187) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (25%) -6.261*** (0.353) Moderation effect of switching (50%) 3.245*** (0.219) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (50%) -5.218*** (0.392) Moderation effect of switching (75%) -38.83*** (1.878) Moderation effect of switching (100%) -41.00*** (1.932) Moderation effect of switching 2.160*** (0.0734) Moderation effect of switching in crisis -1.765*** (0.201) Constant -16.60*** -19.66*** -22.20*** -22.63*** -10.97*** (3.120) (3.118) (3.085) (3.081) (3.017) Observations 8,141 R-squared 0.183 0.179 0.195 0.198 0.243 Results: moderation effect of switching Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

14 Results: moderation effect of switching
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVA Lagged intangible assets 0.193*** 0.293*** 0.259*** 0.257*** (0.0371) (0.0366) (0.0362) (0.0361) (0.0369) Crisis -1.224 -2.567 -5.179 -4.765 -3.521 (6.300) (6.318) (6.253) (6.243) (6.068) Book Value 0.0460*** 0.0476*** 0.0558*** 0.0561*** 0.0354*** ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of switching (25%) 1.234*** (0.187) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (25%) -6.261*** (0.353) Moderation effect of switching (50%) 3.245*** (0.219) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (50%) -5.218*** (0.392) Moderation effect of switching (75%) -38.83*** (1.878) Moderation effect of switching (100%) -41.00*** (1.932) Moderation effect of switching 2.160*** (0.0734) Moderation effect of switching in crisis -1.765*** (0.201) Constant -16.60*** -19.66*** -22.20*** -22.63*** -10.97*** (3.120) (3.118) (3.085) (3.081) (3.017) Observations 8,141 R-squared 0.183 0.179 0.195 0.198 0.243 Results: moderation effect of switching Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

15 Results: moderation effect of switching
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVA Lagged intangible assets 0.193*** 0.293*** 0.259*** 0.257*** (0.0371) (0.0366) (0.0362) (0.0361) (0.0369) Crisis -1.224 -2.567 -5.179 -4.765 -3.521 (6.300) (6.318) (6.253) (6.243) (6.068) Book Value 0.0460*** 0.0476*** 0.0558*** 0.0561*** 0.0354*** ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of switching (25%) 1.234*** (0.187) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (25%) -6.261*** (0.353) Moderation effect of switching (50%) 3.245*** (0.219) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (50%) -5.218*** (0.392) Moderation effect of switching (75%) -38.83*** (1.878) Moderation effect of switching (100%) -41.00*** (1.932) Moderation effect of switching 2.160*** (0.0734) Moderation effect of switching in crisis -1.765*** (0.201) Constant -16.60*** -19.66*** -22.20*** -22.63*** -10.97*** (3.120) (3.118) (3.085) (3.081) (3.017) Observations 8,141 R-squared 0.183 0.179 0.195 0.198 0.243 Results: moderation effect of switching Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

16 Results: moderation effect of switching
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EVA Lagged intangible assets 0.193*** 0.293*** 0.259*** 0.257*** (0.0371) (0.0366) (0.0362) (0.0361) (0.0369) Crisis -1.224 -2.567 -5.179 -4.765 -3.521 (6.300) (6.318) (6.253) (6.243) (6.068) Book Value 0.0460*** 0.0476*** 0.0558*** 0.0561*** 0.0354*** ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of switching (25%) 1.234*** (0.187) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (25%) -6.261*** (0.353) Moderation effect of switching (50%) 3.245*** (0.219) Moderation effect of switching in crisis (50%) -5.218*** (0.392) Moderation effect of switching (75%) -38.83*** (1.878) Moderation effect of switching (100%) -41.00*** (1.932) Moderation effect of switching 2.160*** (0.0734) Moderation effect of switching in crisis -1.765*** (0.201) Constant -16.60*** -19.66*** -22.20*** -22.63*** -10.97*** (3.120) (3.118) (3.085) (3.081) (3.017) Observations 8,141 R-squared 0.183 0.179 0.195 0.198 0.243 Results: moderation effect of switching Standard errors in parentheses *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

17 Results: moderation effect of switching
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) EBIT Lagged intangible assets 0.426*** 0.585*** 0.557*** 0.555*** 0.172*** (0.0417) (0.0416) (0.0414) (0.0413) (0.0422) Book Value 0.112*** 0.116*** 0.125*** 0.126*** 0.100*** ( ) ( ) ( ) Crisis -6.640 -8.113 -11.78* -11.20 -9.160 (6.887) (6.978) (6.942) (6.934) (6.736) Moderation of switching (25%) 1.220*** (0.211) Moderation of switching in crisis (25%) -9.653*** (0.399) Moderation of switching (50%) 3.416*** (0.250) Moderation of switching in crisis (50%) -8.657*** (0.446) Moderation of switching (75%) -47.05*** (2.135) Moderation of switching in crisis (75%) 23.03** (8.977) Moderation of switching (100%) -49.67*** (2.215) Moderation of switching in crisis (100%) 29.16*** (9.025) Moderation of switching 2.514*** (0.0841) Moderation of switching in crisis -3.014*** (0.230) Constant 18.09*** 12.75*** 9.997*** 9.304*** 23.34*** (3.376) (3.410) (3.391) (3.388) (3.315) Observations 8,749 R-squared 0.439 0.424 0.430 0.431 0.463 Results: moderation effect of switching

18 Intermediate results There are different effects on performance considering the level of switching The interaction effect of switching: any change and at 25 and 50% is positive and significant At 75 and 100% is negative and significant The interaction effect of switching in crisis: any change and at 25 and 50% is NEGATIVE and significant At 75 and 100% is POSITIVE and significant (omitted for EVA) There is a change in the effect of the level of switching on performance.

19 Results: threshold in the switching strategy
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) EVA EBIT Lagged intangible assets 0.247*** 0.551*** 0.124*** 0.374*** (0.0360) (0.0419) (0.0365) (0.0417) Book value 0.0373*** 0.109*** 0.0290*** 0.0961*** ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Switching ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of intangible assets -8.658*** -8.991*** -6.372*** -5.545*** (0.567) (0.660) (0.576) (0.661) Square of the moderation effect of intangible assets 0.0242*** 0.0228*** 0.0227*** 0.0207*** ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of intangible assets in crisis -18.31*** -25.59*** (2.102) (2.337) Square of the moderation effect of intangible assets in crisis 0.0197*** 0.0248*** ( ) Constant -10.64*** 18.21*** -3.222 28.71*** (2.779) (3.117) (2.749) (3.035) Observations 8,141 8,749 R-squared 0.206 0.417 0.244 0.461

20 Results: threshold in the switching strategy
VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) EVA EBIT Lagged intangible assets 0.247*** 0.551*** 0.124*** 0.374*** (0.0360) (0.0419) (0.0365) (0.0417) Book value 0.0373*** 0.109*** 0.0290*** 0.0961*** ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Switching ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of intangible assets -8.658*** -8.991*** -6.372*** -5.545*** (0.567) (0.660) (0.576) (0.661) Square of the moderation effect of intangible assets 0.0242*** 0.0228*** 0.0227*** 0.0207*** ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Moderation effect of intangible assets in crisis -18.31*** -25.59*** (2.102) (2.337) Square of the moderation effect of intangible assets in crisis 0.0197*** 0.0248*** ( ) Constant -10.64*** 18.21*** -3.222 28.71*** (2.779) (3.117) (2.749) (3.035) Observations 8,141 8,749 R-squared 0.206 0.417 0.244 0.461

21 Findings External shocks influence more companies decision to change their strategic behavior Still, internal factors are relevant to provide sufficient level of return from the innovative strategy (is coherent with the theoretical findings set by Shakina et al, 2016) there is a minimum required level of investment in innovations in crisis companies have to invest even more to succeed with innovative strategy


Download ppt "SWITCHING TO INNOVATIVE STRATEGY: THE PHANTOM MENACE"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google