1. THEORY OF CRUELTY in the Context of the Death Penalty as a Cruel and Inhumane Punishment Assist. Prof. Dr. Anna-Maria Getoš the Faculty of Law of the University of Zagreb Head of the Max Planck Partner Group for Balkan Criminology

2. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Structure Theory of Cruelty (Trutz von Trotha) Cruelty as a Form of Violence What is Cruelty? Cruelty – State of Art Theory of Cruelty Dispositions of Cruelty Discussion on Death Penalty Arguments On Execution (Wolfgang Sofsky)

3. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) Cruelty as a Form of Violence Trotha's Sociology of Violence [Trutz von Trotha (1997). Zur Soziologie der Gewalt. In: Trutz von Trotha (Ed.), Soziologie der Gewalt. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft 37, 9-56.] "Neue Gewaltforschung" "new research on violence" Ethnographic (Clifford Geertz) and antireductionist "phenomenologically thick description of violence" Focus on violence the how, rather than the why [Trutz von Trotha (2000/01). Gewaltforschung auf Popitzschen Wegen. Antireduktionismus, Zweckhaftigkeit und Körperlichkeit der Gewalt, Gewalt und Herrschaft. Mittelweg 36 9:16, 26-36.]

4. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) What is Cruelty? (p. 14) [Trutz von Trotha (2011). On Cruelty. Conceptual Considerations and a Summary of an Interdisciplinary Debate. In: Trutz von Trotha, Jakob Rösel (Eds.), On Cruelty · Sur la cruauté · Über Grausamkeit. Siegener Beiträge zur Soziologie, Volume 11, 1-67] "Cruelty is the syndrome of dispositions, general human abilities by social actors, and cruel action." Cruelty as an anthropological fact Cruelty as a sociological fact

5. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) Cruelty as an anthropological fact (p. 14) "Cruel action involves an actor with the intention to inflict physical pain or psychological, social, or spiritual suffering on a living being capable of experiencing pain, against the will or resistance of that being. This pain or suffering typically leads to serious damage, up to and including the killing or suicide of the victim. Pain and suffering inflicted upon the victim display an element of excessiveness according to the categories of the respective culture. Pain and suffering experienced by the victim differ from "usual" painful experiences. This includes existential fear of or the experience of physical pain, hopeless helplessness, and existential abandonment."

6. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) Cruelty as a sociological fact (pp. 14-15) "On the other hand, cruelty is the syndrome of cruel action, social practices, and social situations and facilities that promote cruel action, or, in manifold "orders of cruelty," institutionalize and ritualize it." "Established within political and legal institutions, cruelty is among the phenomena with the most serious social consequences." "Cruel action […] is intentional action by responsible actors."

7. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) Cruelty – State of Art (p. 16-17) [Trutz von Trotha (2011). On Cruelty. Conceptual Considerations and a Summary of an Interdisciplinary Debate. In: Trutz von Trotha, Jakob Rösel (Eds.), On Cruelty · Sur la cruauté · Über Grausamkeit. Siegener Beiträge zur Soziologie, Volume 11, 1-67] Lack of… 1.description and definition of cruelty 2.research on correlations in origins and methods of cruelty 3.research and theory on (de)institutionalized cruelty 4.prognosis and treatment of cruelty 5.theory of cruelty

8. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) Theory of Cruelty (pp. 61-67) criticism of cruelty deciphering cruelty in its context a theory of cruelty requires two things: 1.ethnography of cruelty (thick description of cruel action and its political, cultural, social, and economic contexts) 2.institutionalization and de-institutionalization processes of cruelty abolitionist de-institutionalization of individual manifestations of cruelty (torture, death penalty…) by UN, globally acting churches, NGOs… generalizing deinstitutionalization of cruelty (genocide, violent conflicts…)

9. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) Dispositions of Cruelty (pp. 122-146) [Trutz von Trotha (2011). Dispositionen der Grausamkeit. Über die anthropologischen Grundlagen grausamen Handelns. In: Trutz von Trotha, Jakob Rösel (Eds.), On Cruelty · Sur la cruauté · Über Grausamkeit. Siegener Beiträge zur Soziologie, Volume 11, 122-146] cruelty as dissolution of the boundaries of human power relations - unlimited power (Entgrenzung des menschlichen Machtverhältnisses) that leads to the ultimate perfection of power (Vollkommenheit der Macht) cruelty is part of the human nature and is therefore anthropologically rooted

10. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Theory of Cruelty (T. v. Trotha) Dispositions of Cruelty (p. 146) T. v. Trotha localizes the causes of cruelty in two human dispositions: 1.disposition to strive after unlimited power 2.disposition to be fascinated by cruelty

11. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 Discussion - Death Penalty Arguments 1.deterrence argument – death penalty is the ultimate warning 2.retribution argument – it provides closure for victims 3.the death penalty (today) is humane – lethal injection 4.proportionality argument – the best answer to the most heinous crimes

12. International Spring Course, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 24-28 March 2014 On Execution (W. Sofsky) Selected parts in English

13. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! Assist. Prof. Dr. Anna-Maria Getoš agetos@pravo.hr www.balkan-criminology.eu