Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Revision reflects an evolution, not a revolution

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Revision reflects an evolution, not a revolution"— Presentation transcript:

1 Revision reflects an evolution, not a revolution
LCSP Outline v2.0 Revisions are made to: Reflect new statute/policy Incorporate lessons learned Clarify guidance Expand the Funding section to include O&S Cost Estimates, Should Cost Initiatives, and Affordability Stress the tailorability of the document Introduce “Critical Thinking Questions” Reference appropriate DAG sections (future) Plan is to make the LCSP outline stable (ie, update infrequently), while the DAG will evolve to capture new content, best practices, lessons learned, etc. (12-18 month content review). Revision reflects an evolution, not a revolution

2 Comparison of LCSP Outlines
LCSP Outline v1.0 (2011) Introduction Product Support Performance Product Support Strategy Product Support Arrangements Product Support Package Status Regulatory/Statutory Requirements Influencing Product Support Integrated Schedule Funding Management Supportability Analysis Additional Sustainment Planning Factors LCSP Annexes LCSP Outline v2.0 (2017) Introduction Product Support Performance Product Support Strategy Product Support Package Status Design and Sustainment Requirements Integrated Schedule Cost and Funding Management Supportability Analysis LCSP Annexes Incorporated into Section 3 Section renamed Expanded into Cost and Funding to include O&S cost estimates, Should Cost Initiatives, and Affordability Strategy What's Driving What’s Done Where Performance Measures Weapon System Supply Chain Programmatics Requirements -> Contract Management Approach Implementation Status Schedule Reviews Test Results Financial Funding Should Cost Critical thinking questions added to illustrate the thinking required to ensure that sustainment planning is comprehensive, cohesive, and actionable.

3 Implementation ASD(L&MR)Memo to the Components
Review and Approval process unchanged from DoDI (Enclosure 1, Table 2) Timeline New programs and programs in acquisition: Decision reviews more than 9 months away must transition to revised outline Decision review less than 9 months away, may use 2011 outline but must transition to revised outline for subsequent decision reviews Programs in sustainment are not required to transition their sustainment planning document to the revised outline format.


Download ppt "Revision reflects an evolution, not a revolution"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google