Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Making Comparisons All hypothesis testing follows a common logic of comparison Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis mutually exclusive exhaustive.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Making Comparisons All hypothesis testing follows a common logic of comparison Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis mutually exclusive exhaustive."— Presentation transcript:

1 Making Comparisons All hypothesis testing follows a common logic of comparison Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis mutually exclusive exhaustive Experimental design and control group “Republicans have higher income than Democrats”?

2 Methods of Making Comparisons
Independent Variable Categorical measures (nominal or ordinal) Continuous measures (interval or ratio) Dependent Variable Cross-Tabulation & (Chapter 7) Chi-square (Chapter 10) Logistic Regression Compare Means & (Chapter 9) Dummy Variables (Chapter 8) Correlation & Linear Regression

3 Cross-tabulation Relationship between two (or more) variables
Joint frequency distribution Contingency table Observations should be independent of each other One person’s response should tell us nothing about another person’s response Mutually exclusive and exhaustive categories

4 Cross-tabulation If the null hypothesis is true, the independent variable has no effect on the dependent variable The expected frequency for each cell Male Female Total Pro- ? 20 Anti- 80 50 100

5 Expected Frequency of Each Cell
Expected frequency in the ith row and the jth column ……… (Eij) Total counts in the ith row ……… (Ti) Total counts in the jth column ……… (Tj) Total counts in the table ……… (N)

6 Inferences about Sample Means
Hypothesis testing is an inferential process Using limited information to reach a general conclusion Observable evidence from the sample data Unobservable fact about the population Formulate a specific, testable research hypothesis about the population

7 Null Hypothesis no effect, no difference, no change, no relationship, no pattern, no … any pattern in the sample data is due to random sampling error

8 Errors in Hypothesis Testing
Type I Error A researcher finds evidence for a significant result when, in fact, there is no effect (no relationship) in the population. The researcher has, by chance, selected an extreme sample that appears to show the existence of an effect when there is none. The p-value identifies the probability of a Type I error.

9 Cross-Tabulation Lambda Cramer’s V gamma Kendall’s tau-b
Independent Variable Nominal measures Ordinal measures Dependent Variable Lambda Cramer’s V gamma Kendall’s tau-b Kendall’s tau-c Somer’s d

10 Measures of Association
Symmetrical measures of association e.g. Kendall’s tau-b and tau-c Asymmetrical measures of association e.g. lambda and Somer’s d Directional measures of association e.g. Somer’s d PRE measures of association


Download ppt "Making Comparisons All hypothesis testing follows a common logic of comparison Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis mutually exclusive exhaustive."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google