Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Monitoring in-shoe plantar pressures, temperature, and humidity: Reliability and validity of measures from a portable device  Katrina S. Maluf, MSPT,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Monitoring in-shoe plantar pressures, temperature, and humidity: Reliability and validity of measures from a portable device  Katrina S. Maluf, MSPT,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Monitoring in-shoe plantar pressures, temperature, and humidity: Reliability and validity of measures from a portable device  Katrina S. Maluf, MSPT, Robert E. Morley, DSc, Edward J. Richter, BS, Joseph W. Klaesner, PhD, Michael J. Mueller, PhD, PT  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  Volume 82, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001) DOI: /apmr Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2 Fig. 1 Instrumented shoe insole (A) and portable electronics module (B). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr ) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3 Fig. 2 Example of the pressure change recorded concurrently by Paromed and F-scan sensors under the third metatarsal head during a single step (r =.99). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr ) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4 Fig. 3 Comparison of PP, PTI, and CT measures. Bars represent Paromed pressure sensor recordings from 50 consecutive steps (mean ± SD) collected every 2 hours during an 8-hour wearing trial in a healthy, sensate subject. Mean and SD of measures across all time periods are noted on graphs for each sensor location. Note the similarity of measures across time for each sensor location. Walking velocities for each trial were as follows: 86.0, 83.9, 86.0, 84.6, and 86.0m/min for 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours, respectively. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr ) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

5 Fig. 4 Comparison of in-shoe electronic sensor and thermometer temperature recordings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr ) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

6 Fig. 5 (A-F) Representative examples of pressure distribution patterns during selected weight-bearing activities. Arrow in (D) indicates pivot step. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /apmr ) Copyright © 2001 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Monitoring in-shoe plantar pressures, temperature, and humidity: Reliability and validity of measures from a portable device  Katrina S. Maluf, MSPT,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google