Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Discussion about Use Case and Architecture in Developer Guide

Published byThomas Manning Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Discussion about Use Case and Architecture in Developer Guide"— Presentation transcript:

1 Discussion about Use Case and Architecture in Developer Guide
Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Norihiro Okui, KDDI, Meeting Date: Agenda Item: <agenda item topic name>

2 Security Functions Authentication Secure Communication Authorization
TLS Handshake MAF Secure Communication SAEF ES Prim & ES Data TLS Authorization Access Control Policy Dynamic Authorization

3 Use Case (Overview) Extended version of Application Developer Guide (TR-0025) Home Device Management Privacy Policy Manager 3rd party service provider Cloud Service Platform Home Gateway Light #1 Light #2

4 Use Case(from TR-0025) The lights are deployed in a home and are attached to a home gateway. The home gateway communicates with a cloud service platform allowing the lights to be controlled remotely by the smartphone. The cloud service platform supports a set of services to enable the smartphone to more easily control the lights in the home. Some examples of services include registration, discovery, data management, group management, subscription/notification etc The smartphone hosts an application used to remotely control the lights in the home and supports the following capabilities: Discovery of lights deployed in the home. Sending commands to change light states i.e. ON and OFF. Retrieval of light states.

5 Additional Use Case 3rd Party requests status of lights to improve their service. From status of lights, service provider can distinguish that a user is in home or not. Delivery service provider can deliver efficiently Privacy risk Status of lights is one of personal data Privacy Policy Manager (PPM) manages access controls for personal data. PPM is defined Dynamic Authorization Server in oneM2M Release2

6 Architecture Privacy Policy Manager 3rd party service provider
IN-AE-2 Privacy Policy Manager 3rd party service provider IN-AE-3 IN-CSE Cloud Service Platform MN-AE MN-CSE Home Gateway IN-AE-1 AND-AE-1 AND-AE-2 Light #1 Light #2

7 Authentication Each entity should be authenticate each other.
Privacy Policy Manager 3rd party service provider Cloud Service Platform Home Gateway Light #1 Light #2

8 Authorization Case Case 1 Case 2 Home Gateway stores status of lights
Cloud Service Platform stores status of lights

9 Authorization (Case1) Privacy Policy Manager
3rd party service provider Evaluate ACPs in Home Gateway and make access decision Cloud Service Platform Home Gateway Update status of light Home Gateway stores status of each lights Light #1 Light #2

10 Dynamic Authorization(Case1)
Privacy Policy Manager Issue a Token or DynamicACPinfo 3rd party service provider Request access control decision Cloud Service Platform Home Gateway Retrieve status of light Light #1 Light #2

11 Authorization (Case2) Evaluate ACPs in Home Gateway and make access decision Privacy Policy Manager 3rd party service provider Cloud Service Platform stores status of each lights Cloud Service Platform Home Gateway Update status of light Light #1 Light #2

12 Dynamic Authorization(Case2)
Retrieve status of light Privacy Policy Manager Issue a Token or DynamicACPinfo 3rd party service provider Cloud Service Platform Request access control decision Home Gateway Light #1 Light #2

Download ppt "Discussion about Use Case and Architecture in Developer Guide"

Similar presentations

SEC Clarification Group Name: WG4 (SEC-2014-xxxx) Decision  Meeting Date: 2014-05-07 Discussion  Source: OBERTHUR Technologies Information  Contact:

SEC Clarification Group Name: WG4 (SEC-2014-xxxx) Decision  Meeting Date: Discussion  Source: OBERTHUR Technologies Information  Contact:
Access Control Mechanism for User Group Name: SEC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: 2013-12-9 Agenda Item:

Access Control Mechanism for User Group Name: SEC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
A Java Architecture for the Internet of Things Noel Poore, Architect Pete St. Pierre, Product Manager Java Platform Group, Internet of Things September.

A Java Architecture for the Internet of Things Noel Poore, Architect Pete St. Pierre, Product Manager Java Platform Group, Internet of Things September.
Service Layer Session Management Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP16 Agenda Item:

Service Layer Session Management Group Name: WG2-ARC Source: IDCC, LGE, ZTE Meeting Date: TP16 Agenda Item:
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource Group Name: WG2/WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: 2013-10-16 Agenda Item: TBD.

Device Management using mgmtCmd resource Group Name: WG2/WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
OneM2M-ARC-2013-0365-Service_examples_and_evolution Service examples and evolution Group Name: WG2 Source: Philip Jacobs, Cisco Systems,

OneM2M-ARC Service_examples_and_evolution Service examples and evolution Group Name: WG2 Source: Philip Jacobs, Cisco Systems,
oneM2M-OIC Interworking Technical Comparison

oneM2M-OIC Interworking Technical Comparison
Step by step approach Group Name: WG2

Step by step approach Group Name: WG2
Draft-qi-i2nsf-access-network- usecase-00 Author: Minpeng Qi, Xiaojun Zhuang.

Draft-qi-i2nsf-access-network- usecase-00 Author: Minpeng Qi, Xiaojun Zhuang.
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: 2013-11-19 Agenda Item:

In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
End-to-End security definition Group Name: SEC WG4 Source: Phil Hawkes, Qualcomm, Meeting Date: 2015-05-18.

End-to-End security definition Group Name: SEC WG4 Source: Phil Hawkes, Qualcomm, Meeting Date:
Application Policy on Network Functions (APONF) G. Karagiannis and T.Tsou 1.

Application Policy on Network Functions (APONF) G. Karagiannis and T.Tsou 1.
Authorization for IoT Group Name: oneM2M SEC WG Source: Francois Ennesser, Gemalto NV Meeting Date: 2014-09-03 Agenda Item:

Authorization for IoT Group Name: oneM2M SEC WG Source: Francois Ennesser, Gemalto NV Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: 2013-11-26 Agenda Item:

In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
TS0001 Identifiers way forward Group Name: WG2 Source: Elloumi, Foti, Scarrone, Lu (tbc), Jeong (tbc) Meeting Date: 2014-06-07 Agenda Item: ARC11/PRO11.

TS0001 Identifiers way forward Group Name: WG2 Source: Elloumi, Foti, Scarrone, Lu (tbc), Jeong (tbc) Meeting Date: Agenda Item: ARC11/PRO11.
WG1 status report to TP#17 Group Name: oneM2M TP17 Source: Shelby Kiewel (iconectiv) Meeting Date: 2015-05-17 to 2015-05-21 Agenda Item: TP#17, Item 10.3,

WG1 status report to TP#17 Group Name: oneM2M TP17 Source: Shelby Kiewel (iconectiv) Meeting Date: to Agenda Item: TP#17, Item 10.3,
Work Group / Work Item Proposal Slide 1 © 2012 oneM2M Partners oneM2M-TP-2012-0007-oneM2M_Work_Group_Work_Item_Proposal Group name: Technical Plenary Source:

Work Group / Work Item Proposal Slide 1 © 2012 oneM2M Partners oneM2M-TP oneM2M_Work_Group_Work_Item_Proposal Group name: Technical Plenary Source:
Supporting long polling Group Name: ARC WG Source: SeungMyeong, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: 2013-0x-xx Agenda Item: TBD.

Supporting long polling Group Name: ARC WG Source: SeungMyeong, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: x-xx Agenda Item: TBD.
Proposal for WG3 & WG5 work area split

Proposal for WG3 & WG5 work area split
Access Control Status Report Group Name: ARC/SEC Source: Dragan Vujcic, Oberthur Technologies, Meeting Date: 09/12/2013 Agenda Item:

Access Control Status Report Group Name: ARC/SEC Source: Dragan Vujcic, Oberthur Technologies, Meeting Date: 09/12/2013 Agenda Item:

Similar presentations

Ads by Google