Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byByron Samuel Crawford Modified over 6 years ago
1
Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document GlobAlbedo Aerosol Retrieval
Peter North, Andreas Heckel Swansea University L. Guanter, R. Preusker, J. Fischer Free University of Berlin
2
Aims AOT retrieval for all sensors based on common set of aerosol models and RTM Avoid a priori assumptions on surface albedo for AOT retrieval Development of separate inversion constraints to exploit the characteristics of the instruments Per pixel uncertainty estimates for error propagation
3
Spatial interpolation
Algorithm Scheme (A)ATSR RTOA (8 channels) MERIS RTOA (13 channels) VGT RTOA Iterative inversion (image subsets) Atmospheric correction using LUT: F(RTOA, Ma , t550 , O3, H2O, H,S, V, R, ) -> RSURF(,S, V, R, ) Optimise t550 and Ma to minimise EMOD Test fit with surface model: N Y RTOA (Land, cloud-free) Initial estimate: Ma , t550 Auxiliary data: O3,H2O, DEM, Ma, t550 and Dt550 (Sparse grid) Water/cloud masking RTOA (Land, cloud-free) Initial estimate: Ma , t550 Auxiliary data: O3,H2O, DEM, Aerosol Retrieval Ma, t550 and Dt550 (Sparse grid) Spatial interpolation (A)ATSR Ma, t550 Dt550 MERIS Ma, t550 Dt550 VGT Ma, t550 Dt550
4
TOA - SDR Inversion LUT Approximation of the radiative transfer problem Inversion of TOA reflectance to SDRs based on lookup tables Ratm, gl and rl tabulated in lookup tables
5
Aerosol Models LUTs provide atmospheric parameters for a set of 7 different aerosol models Potential to retrieve aerosol type Option to set fixed aerosol model to increase performance and consistency
6
Trace Gas Absorption Fitting of surface models requires correction of trace gas absorptions Additional LUT provide trace gas transmittance tg(AMFgeo)
7
Surface Reflectance Models
Angular Model (ATSR-2,AATSR) Spectral Model (MERIS, VGT) Mixed Model (AATSR) Apply spectral model to AATSR channels Linear combination of angular and spectral models
8
Optimal AOT and Uncertainty
Minimum of error metric determines optimal AOT Aim: tuning of constraints to retrieve same AOT with the different instruments Per-pixel uncertainty is defined as: Emin : Minimum value of error metric a : Curvature at minimum k : scaling (to be defined validation)
9
Tomsk
10
TOA Reflectance
11
Pixel classification Removal of cloudy and non-land pixel
12
Spatial Binning Assumption of smooth AOT field 9x9 pixel bins
“Improves” AATSR co-registration Enables better surface model fits
13
Retrieved AOT Low resolution AOT field with gaps
Gaps larger than in original resolution due to binning Needs gap filling
14
Spatial Interpolation
Gaps interpolated and rescaled to original input resolution
15
Final AOT product Final AOT map with high resolution valid pixel mask applied
16
Preliminary AOT Test Data-Set
AATSR TOA RGB AATSR AOT AATSR DAOT VGT TOA RGB VGT AOT VGT DAOT
17
AATSR Tomsk 15.5.2003 False colour RGB AOT AOT uncertainty
Improved AOT AOT uncertainty
18
Tomsk: Synergy, MERIS Lv2, MODIS
19
Correlation TOA Reflectance VGT - AATSR
20
AOT Validation Quantitative comparison vs. Aeronet measurements
Spatial average 15x15km Temporal overlap 30min Qualitative comparison vs. other satellite products (MERIS L2, MODIS)
21
Summary Draft processor for AOT retrieval of MERIS, VGT and AATSR implemented in BEAM 1 year test data-set of AOT and per-pixel uncertainty of AATSR and VGT processed Known issues / Next steps Refinement of constraints necessary to retrieve homogenous aerosol for all three sensors Single aerosol model only Optimisations of implementation to increase performance
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.