Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Hyo Jong Kim Division of Gastroenterology Department of Internal Medicine Kyung Hee University Medical Center
3
CRC in Korea
4
CRC in Korea 2004년 사망원인통계연보, 통계청
5
CRC in Korea
6
CRC in Korea 100 Colon cancer 80 60 Lung cancer Stomach cancer 40
Liver cancer 20 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
7
Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence
8
Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence
and Polypectomy 10 yrs X
9
CRC: A Preventable Disease
Common and lethal Long presymptomatic dwell time High cure rate with early detection Safe, accurate diagnostic tests
10
Prevent the Preventable Disease!
11
The Case of George W. Bush
12
Bush Transferred Presidential Power
The New York Times June 30, 2002
13
Bush Returns to Activities
14
Cheney? No More! CNN. Tuesday, November
15
Cheney Gets to be President for 2 hours
16
The Case of George W. Bush
1998 Screening Colonoscopy Polypectomy for benign polyp 1st Follow-up Colonoscopy 1999 Polypectomy for benign polyp 2002 2nd Follow-up Colonoscopy propofol, 20 mins 1.5 ounces of Fleet's phosphosoda, Propofol, 20 mins
17
The Case of George W. Bush
1998 Screening Colonoscopy Polypectomy for benign polyp 1st Follow-up Colonoscopy 1999 Polypectomy for benign polyp 2002 2nd Follow-up Colonoscopy Negative ;1.5 ounces of Fleet's phosphosoda, Propofol, 20 mins
18
Cumulative Incidence of CRC in the National Polyp Study Cohort
Incidence Reduction 90% 88% 76% *; P<0.001 SEER; The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Winawer SJ. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:
19
CRC Screening Options Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) annually
Flexible sigmoidoscopy q 5 yrs FOBT + sigmoidoscopy q 5 yrs Double Contrast Barium enema (DCBE) q 5 yrs Colonoscopy q 10 yrs
20
Evidence for CRC Screening
Strategy Mortality Incidence Reduction Reduction FOBT %-33% % Sigmoidoscopy % FOBT + sigmoidoscopy % DCBE unknown Colonoscopy RR %-60% USPSTF. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:132
21
Colonoscopy versus Sigmoidoscopy
22
Colonoscopy versus Sigmoidoscopy
23
The Michelangelo Code Michelangelo's "Night"
24
The Michelangelo Code Breast Cancer in Michelangelo's "Night"
25
The Michelangelo Code Breast Cancer in Michelangelo's "Night"
26
Sigmoidoscopy =? Single Mammography
Breast Cancer in Michelangelo's "Night"
27
Screening Test Efficacy for CRC
One-Time Testing Detection Rate of Advanced Neoplasia (%) FOBT alone Sigmoidoscopy alone Combined FOBT and sigmoidoscopy DCBE Colonoscopy
28
Recommended Tests and Screening Intervals
Test USPSTF GC ACG ACS KNCC Year of recommendation Sigmoidoscopy recommended q 5 yr q 5 yr q 5 yr interval ? Colonoscopy insufficient q 10 yr q 10 yr † q 10 yr q 5-10 yr evidence *: Persons at average risk for CRC, screening should begin at the age of 50 years, † : preferred strategy USPSTF: US Preventive Services Task Force, GC: Gastrointestimal Consortium, ACG: American College of Gastroenterology ACS: American Cancer Society, KNCC: Korean National Cancer Institute
29
Korean National Guideline†
All persons ≥ 50 y shoud begin regular screening colonoscopy q 5-10yr (preferred) DCBE + sigmoidoscopy q 5-10 yr †;Korean Society of Coloproctology and National Cancer Center, 2001
30
Cost, Resources, and Capacity
Screening
31
Surveillance N Engl J Med 2006;355:2551
32
Korean Population Structure
2002 2020 26.7% 41.7% Male Female Male Female Thousand persons Statistical Handblook of Korea 2002, Korean National Statistical Office.
33
Cost, Resources, and Capacity
Screening Surveillance
34
Diagnostic Yield of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in Men
Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380 17,732 (men=96.8%) N Engl J Med 2001;345:55
35
Diagnostic Yield of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in Men and Women
Tandem study to Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380 1,463 women N Engl J Med 2005;352:2061
36
Sex, Independent Predictor
N Engl J Med 2006;358:1863
37
Number Needed to Screen
N Engl J Med 2006;358:1863
38
Polypectomy
39
Is it too big to remove endoscopically?
40
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection(ESD) for Rectosigmoid Epithelial Neoplasm
41
Endoscopic Management of ECC†
† ECC: Early Colorectal Cancer
42
ESD for Early Sigmoid Cancer
43
ESD for Early Sigmoid Cancer
44
ESD for Early Sigmoid Cancer
45
ESD for Early Sigmoid Cancer
46
Emerging Screening Tests
CT Colonoscopy Stool DNA testing
47
CT Colonoscopy N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191
48
CT Colonoscopy; Endoview
49
CT Colonoscopy; Filet view
50
Screening CT Colonoscopy
CT colonoscopy and Opitical Colonoscopy for the Detection of Adenomas N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191
51
CT Colonoscopy: Clinical Application
obstructing sigmoid cancer
52
CT Colonoscopy in Unsuccessful Colonoscopy
53
CT Colonoscopy in Unsuccessful Colonoscopy
54
CT Colonoscopy in Unsuccessful Colonoscopy
55
Laparoscopically Assisted Colectomy
56
A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and
Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer n=872 median follow-up; 4.4 yrs P=0.32 P=0.50 Cumulative Incidence of Recurrence Overall Survival N Egnl J Med 2004;350:2050
57
Normal Cell Growth and Carcinogenesis
Inactivation of Tumor Suppressor Genes promotion of cell growth, inhibition of cell death nomal epithelium dysplastic ACF mild dysplasia severe dysplasia invasive tumor Activation of Proto-oncogenes stimulation of cell proliferation
58
Colorectal neoplasia is….
59
…. a Genetic Disease RAS mutation APC mutation and loss p53 mutation
SMAD2/4 DCC loss
60
Molecular Markers in a Single Test
10 mutations in APC 3 muations in K-ras 8 muations in p53 1 microsatellite instability marker, BAT-26 1 long DNA marker
61
Fecal DNA Panel and Occult-Blood Test
Most advanced finding at colonoscopy Group that could be evaluated (N=4404) Analyzed subgroup (N=2507) Positive Fecal DNA Panel Postive occult-blood test Adenocarcinoma 31 31 16/31 (51.6) 4/31 (12.9) Adenocarcinoma + high-grade dysplasia 72 71 29/71 (40.8) 10/71 (14.1) Advanced adenoma 426 403 61/403 (15.1) 43/403 (10.7) Minor polyps 1627 648 49/648 (7.6) 31/648 (4.8) No polyps on colonoscopy 2318 1423 79/1423 (5.6) 68/1423 (4.8) N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1384.
62
Bush’s Note at the 2005 World Summit
“I think I may NEED A BATHROOM BREAK? Is this possible?” U.S. President George W. Bush writes a note to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during a Security Council meeting at the 2005 World Summit and 60th General Assembly of the United Nations in New York September 14,
63
Bush’s Fecal DNA Test
64
Low screening rates 38.7% 29.9% 23.5% 19.4%
Among appropriate populations that receive screening tests CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillnace System (BRFSS),U.S.,2001
65
Among appropriate populations that receive screening tests
Compliance % 100 Pap Test * 80 PSA Test† Mammography * 60 FOBT &/or Endoscopy * 75% 81% Endoscopy* 70% 40 FOBT* 42% 20 40% 17% Selected Tests Among appropriate populations that receive screening tests †;JAMA. 2003;289:1414, *; CDC’s Naional Health Intervew Survey (NHIS) 2000
66
The Case of Katie Couric
67
“Katie Couric Effect” March, 2000
68
Public Awareness Katie Couric, the screening role for colonoscopy
69
``Katie Couric Procedure''
March, 2002
70
Obstacles To Screening Compliance
Public acceptance of screening tests Public awareness Physician awareness of screening
71
Physician Awareness of Screening
1998 Gallup poll (U.S.) <50% of all Americans ≥ 50 yrs have ever had any type of screening 88% of of nonscreened patients said health care provider had not discussed screening by the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable (NCCR)
72
patient care organization succesful screening programs
physician insurer patient care organization succesful screening programs
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.