1. <http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i> Linked Data Issues
Building
RDFising process (schema, mapping)
Interlinking (automagically, manual)
Deployment (SPARQL end point, dump, RDFa, etc.)
Using
Provenance, trust, rights, etc.
Access (depending on deployment)
Performance (deref chain, reliability)
Discovery (which is the right LOD dataset for my task ?)

2. User Contributed Interlinking
User Contributed Interlinking (UCI) means end-user manually creates semantic links (Wiki-style)
Based on the work in riese we developed I R S (interlinking of resources with semantics, see also poster session)
I R S features
query, add, remove semantic links (owl:sameAs, rdfs:seeAlso, foaf:topic, etc.)
subject and object can be set by user (restriction: URIs only)
resource preview (debug)
expose data in XHTML+RDFa + SPARQL end point
lookup in for unknown resources
simple provenance tracking through named graphs

3. Discovery
how to determine what a LOD dataset is about (or: find the right LOD dataset for a certain task)
FYN, for sure, but how about a rough categorisation
certain things can be done with the semantic sitemap extension (type of access, etc.)
what about the rest? proposal: metaLOD
metaLOD should cover:
a simple vocabulary
way of accessing information (no centralised registry)
good practice rules for LOD dataset operators
currently we are gathering ideas – consider contributing 