1. Reinventing Performance Management
If you would need to apply this Deloitte way to your company in which you work now (or worked lately or you know of) – what would be the easy and difficult points to implement?
Please comment the article in relation to Saara’s presentation as well – what was common, what was different?

2. Positive in Deloitte way
Way to change the questions
Atmosphere: open discussions
Talking about people’s future and not about the ratings
To encourage employees with formulas – to take some burden away from the employer side
Closest manager

3. Challenge in Deloitte way
Discussion often
easier eg in consulting companies after the project
Difficult to find people
Time consuming, not easy to organise a study within an organisation
Change is always challenge
Is not meeting your closest head/manager a challenge?
Ratings – are they fair?

4. Characteristics of Wärtsilä
Feedback
How more important that what
Behavior and performance both looked at
Very centralised way – local HR handling practicalities and global HR is the developing agency

5. Common with Wärtsilä Concentration on feedback Centralisation
Development thinking
Change from 1970s

6. Different from Wärtsilä
Ranking and salary not linked
Numbers important in Wärtsilä ranking
View of 360, continuous and once a year