Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assay Parameters Affecting Variability Of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube Assay Results Whitworth WC1, Mazurek GH1, Goodwin DJ2 1Centers for Disease Control.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assay Parameters Affecting Variability Of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube Assay Results Whitworth WC1, Mazurek GH1, Goodwin DJ2 1Centers for Disease Control."— Presentation transcript:

1 Assay Parameters Affecting Variability Of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube Assay Results Whitworth WC1, Mazurek GH1, Goodwin DJ2 1Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of TB Elimination, Atlanta, GA, USA; 2United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, USA Introduction Results The QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube test (QFT-GIT), designed to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection, measures the interferon gamma (IFN-γ) response to specific Mtb peptides using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Variability due to differing test parameters may limit test utility. We hypothesized that 1) a lower incubation temperature, 2) a longer delay from blood collection to incubation, and 3) a shorter incubation duration would result in lower IFN-γ levels. 158 subjects were enrolled (Figure 1) 155, 102, 152, and 149 had paired ELISA results available for the control, incubation temperature, incubation duration, and delay to incubation comparisons, respectively. A lower number of subjects were available for the temperature assessment because this objective was added after 50 subjects had been enrolled into the study. Figure 1. Subject enrollment and study design. Experimental parameters are shown in blue. QUALITATIVE RESULTS Results from qualitative comparisons of test interpretations are shown in Tables 2-4 A (crosstabs of interpretations) and Tables 2-4 B (line lists of subjects with discordant results). There was one indeterminate result for the delay (11-12 hr test), duration (16-17 hr test), and control (Test 2) comparisons due to low mitogen responses (same subject for the duration and control comparisons). Tables 5A & 5B: Control. 5A. Crosstab B. Discordants. Test 2 Test 1 Test 2 ID TB Nil TB Resp. Interp. 70 0.775 0.184 0.591 0.496 0.171 0.325 pos/neg 109 0.589 0.186 0.403 0.388 0.138 0.250 146 1.934 0.107 1.827 0.068 0.075 -0.007 37 0.363 0.166 0.197 0.559 neg/pos 103 0.366 0.035 0.331 0.612 0.073 0.539 140 0.338 0.046 0.292 0.675 0.044 0.631 147 0.440 0.116 0.324 0.633 0.558 pos neg 27 3 30 4 120 124 31 123 154 Methods Test 1 Tables 2A & 2B: Incubation temperature. 2A. Crosstab B. Discordants. Subject Selection Subjects recruited at two sites as part of a larger study investigating QFT-GIT reproducibility Inclusion: self-reported prior-positive TST to enrich the number of positives (prior unpublished assessments in similar cohorts have found that 40% to 50% of persons with self-reported prior-positive TST results were positive by QFT-GIT vs. <3% for the general U.S. population) Exclusion: TST in the past 3 years or < 18 years old QFT-GIT Testing and Experimental Design Subjects were seen at 2 visits: 1) Visit 1, 6 to 9 am on Day 1 and 2) Visit 2, 6 to 9 pm on Day 7 At each visit, blood was collected into three sets of QFT-GIT tubes (three tests), each set consisting of one Nil (Nil), one Mitogen (phytohemagglutinin A), and one TB antigen (TB) tube for each test Tubes mixed with Stuart rock and roll mixer (Scitech Instruments, Franklin, NJ) for 3 minutes at 33 RPM ELISAs performed on a Triturus automated ELISA workstation (Grifols USA, Miami, FL), using eight IFN-γ calibrators (8, 4, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0 IU/mL) in duplicate to create standard curves [IFN-γ] (IU/mL) calculated from standard curve using software developed at the CDC, and test results interpreted as indicated in the Cellestis package insert and CDC guidelines “TB Response” calculated by subtracting [IFN-γ] from unstimulated blood (Nil) from [IFN-γ] from Mtb antigen-stimulated blood (TB) “Mitogen Response” (positive control) was calculated by subtracting [IFN-γ] from unstimulated blood (Nil) from [IFN-γ] from mitogen-stimulated blood Three assay parameters were intentionally varied and included a control. Paired comparisons of test results using an experimental parameter vs. those using a reference parameter were performed. For each comparison, all test parameters were identical except for the experimental parameter being assessed. Reference parameters were a) 37.0 (± 1.0) oC incubation temperature, b) ≤ 1 hour delay to incubation (at ambient temperature, range 18 oC to 24 oC), and c) 23 to 24 hour incubation duration. 1) Incubation temperature assessment Reference parameter: 37.0 (± 1.0) oC Experimental parameter: 35.0 (± 1.0) oC Both tests using reference delay to incubation of ≤ 1 hour and 23 to 24 hour incubation duration 2) Delay from blood collection to incubation assessment Reference parameter: ≤ 1 hour at ambient temperature Experimental parameter: 11 to 12 hours at ambient temperature Both tests using reference incubation temperature of 37 oC and 23 to 24 hour incubation duration 3) Incubation duration assessment Reference parameter: 23 to 24 hours Experimental parameter: 16 to 17 hours Both tests using reference incubation temperature of 37 oC and delay to incubation of ≤ 1 hour 4) Control (reproducibility, 2 tests from 2 samples collected at the same visit using same parameters) All 3 reference parameters; 1st test also used as reference comparator in the temperature assessment Statistical Methods Subjects with incomplete tests were excluded from each comparison, and subjects with indeterminate results were excluded from qualitative analyses Qualitative (comparison of +/- test interpretations between reference and experimental parameter groups) Comparison of percent positive of all subjects by each test using McNemar’s test Percent discordant and percent positive among discordants Percent of discordant subjects with results the near the QFT-GIT cutoff (±0.25 IU/mL) Quantitative (comparison of IFN-γ concentrations between reference and experimental parameter groups) Distributional differences in Nil, TB, and TB Response using Wilcoxon signed-rank test 268 persons encountered 158 subjects consented 55 persons declined 55 persons not eligible 37 oC 35 oC ID TB Nil TB Resp. Interp. 70 0.775 0.184 0.591 0.527 0.262 0.265 pos/neg 85 0.651 0.080 0.571 0.392 0.061 0.331 145 1.996 0.099 1.897 0.068 0.094 -0.026 146 1.934 0.107 1.827 0.060 0.047 83 2.136 1.990 0.146 3.394 1.602 1.792 neg/pos 138 0.519 0.234 0.285 0.823 0.373 0.450 140 0.338 0.046 0.292 0.524 0.052 0.472 155 0.296 0.040 0.256 0.560 0.073 0.487 35 oC 19.5% (30/154) positive with Test 1 vs % (31/154) positive with Test 2, p = 0.36 Discordance = 4.5% (7/154) Among discordants: 42.9% (3/7) positive with Test 1 vs. 57.1% (4/7) positive with Test 2 71.4% (5/7) with both TB Responses within IU/mL of cutoff (red) pos neg 17 4 21 77 81 102 37 oC Significantly more subjects were positive with a delay to incubation of ≤ 1 hour than with a delay of 11 to 12 hours (25% vs. 21%, p = 0.03). The widest disparities between the two discordant categories, showing more positives for the reference parameters than the experimental parameters, were seen for the delay (8 vs. 2) and duration (6 vs. 2) comparisons. Among discordants, the delay and duration comparisons had fewer subjects with both TB Response values near the QFT-GIT cutoff than the temperature and control comparisons, suggesting a lower likelihood of these effects being attributable to test variation alone. Parameter Visit 1 (Day 1, am collection) Visit 2 (Day 7, pm collection) Temperature 37 oC 35 oC Delay ≤ 1 hr ≤ 1hr 11-12 hrs Duration 23-24 hrs 16-17 hrs 20.6 % (21/102) positive with 37 oC incubation vs % (21/102) positive with 35 oC incubation, p = 1.00 Discordance = 7.8% (8/102) Among discordants: 50.0% (4/8) positive with 37 oC incubation vs % (4/8) positive with 35 oC incubation 62.5% (5/8) with both TB Responses within IU/mL of cutoff (red) Control (Reproducibility) n = 155 Incubation Temperature n = 102 Duration n = 152 Delay to n = 149 Tables 3A & 3B: Delay to incubation. 3A. Crosstab B. Discordants. QUANTITATIVE RESULTS Quantitative results are shown in Table 6. Table 6. Medians and means of test results, IU/mL IFN-γ. Comparisons: ≤ 1 hr 11-12 hr ID TB Nil TB Resp. Interp. 5 0.405 0.040 0.364 0.132 0.037 0.095 pos/neg 66 0.493 0.069 0.424 0.299 0.053 0.246 81 0.869 0.071 0.798 0.360 0.291 85 0.691 0.114 0.577 0.086 0.274 123 0.475 0.100 0.375 0.217 0.055 0.162 138 0.957 0.289 0.668 0.521 0.232 140 0.989 0.079 0.910 0.285 0.087 0.198 147 0.845 0.161 0.684 0.241 0.105 0.136 37 0.312 0.236 0.076 0.655 0.154 0.501 neg/pos 83 2.154 3.900 -1.746 1.319 0.074 1.245 11-12 hr pos neg 29 8 37 2 109 111 31 117 148 ≤ 1 hr Nil TB TB Response p-value Parameter Median Mean TB Resp. Temperature 37 oC 0.08 0.11 0.12 1.09 0.05 0.98 0.23 0.57 35 oC 1.12 0.02 1.00 Delay ≤ 1 hr 0.15 1.38 0.04 1.23 0.0009 11-12 hr 0.07 0.10 1.13 0.03 1.03 Duration 23-24 hr 1.45 1.30 0.25 0.002 16-17 hr 1.21 1.08 Control Test 1 0.13 0.93 0.82 0.77 0.69 Test 2 0.96 0.84 Subject characteristics of the 158 subjects are shown in Table 1. Mean/median age of 45/46 years (range 24 to 74) Most born in the United States or Canada (72%) and had lived abroad for ≥ 1 year (58%) Most received therapy for LTBI (72%) Table 1. Subject characteristics, N = 158. 25.0 % (37/148) positive with ≤ 1 hr delay vs. 20.9% (31/148) positive with hr delay, p = 0.03 Discordance = 6.8% (10/148) Among discordants: 80.0% (8/10) positive with ≤ 1 hr delay vs % (2/10) positive with hr delay 30.0% (3/10) with both TB Responses within IU/mL of cutoff (red) Category n (%) Age, years 16 (10.1%) Therapy for LTBI Yes 114 (72.2%) 35 (22.2%) No 43 (27.2%) 45 (28.5%) Unknown 1 (0.6%) 42 (26.6%) ≥ 60 20 (12.7%) Exposure to Active TB 60 (38.0%) 74 (47.1%) Gender M 70 (44.3%) 24 (15.2%) F 88 (55.7%) BCG 32 (20.3%) Race/Ethnicity White, non-Hispanic 79 (50.0%) 112 (70.9%) Black, non-Hispanic 37 (23.4%) 14 (8.9%) Asian/Pacific 18 (11.4%) Hispanic 15 (9.5%) Native American Region of Birth United States/Canada 113 (71.5%) Other 8 (5.1%) Asia Central America/Caribbean 12 (7.6%) Africa 7 (4.4%) Last Positive TST Europe/Russia 4 (2.5%) Pacific 3 (1.9%) Southeast Asia 2 (1.3%) Middle East 65 (41.1%) South America 54 (34.2%) Years Lived Outside USA None 66 (41.8%) 1 - 10 63 (39.9%) Therapy for TB 154 (97.5%) Tables 4A & 4B: Incubation duration. 4A. Crosstab B. Discordants. IFN-γ levels for TB and TB Response were significantly lower with longer delay and shorter incubation. 23-24 hr 16-17 hr ID TB Nil TB Resp. Interp. 5 0.405 0.040 0.364 0.110 0.034 0.076 pos/neg 81 0.869 0.071 0.798 0.309 0.060 0.249 85 0.691 0.114 0.577 0.336 0.098 0.238 119 2.221 2.145 0.387 0.059 0.328 123 0.475 0.100 0.375 0.134 0.039 0.095 151 0.622 0.099 0.523 0.468 0.217 0.251 83 2.154 3.900 -1.746 4.822 1.402 3.420 neg/pos 109 0.411 0.277 0.670 0.158 0.512 16-17 hr Conclusions pos neg 33 6 39 2 110 112 35 116 151 23-24 hr Lower QFT-GIT IFN-γ TB Response levels are observed with longer delays from blood collection to incubation (11 to 12 hrs vs. ≤ 1 hr) despite being within the limits recommended by the manufacturer of within 16 hours, p = These differences translate to a greater number of positive results with a shorter delay of ≤ 1 hr (25%) than with a longer delay of 11 to 12 hrs (21%), p = 0.03. Lower QFT-GIT IFN-γ TB Response levels are observed with shorter incubation duration (16 to 17 hrs vs. 23 to 24 hrs) despite being within the limits recommended by the manufacturer of 16 to 24 hours, p = These differences translate to a greater number of positive results with a longer duration of 23 to 24 hrs (26%) than with a shorter duration of 16 to 17 hrs (23%), but this difference was not significant, p = 0.08. 25.8 % (39/151) positive with hr incubation vs. 23.2% (35/151) positive with hr incubation, p = 0.08 Discordance = 5.3% (8/151) Among discordants: 75.0% (6/8) positive with hr duration vs % (2/8) positive with hr duration 37.5% (3/8) with both TB Responses within IU/mL of cutoff (red) Contact William C. Whitworth, MPH (404) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Case Number: 88ABW , 27 Apr 2012, USAF


Download ppt "Assay Parameters Affecting Variability Of QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube Assay Results Whitworth WC1, Mazurek GH1, Goodwin DJ2 1Centers for Disease Control."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google