1. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The schematic representation of the life cycle model

2. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The usage time of the retired laptops and the cumulative repair cost ratio (CRCR). The status of laptops is shown at the moment of retirement decision.

3. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The average cumulative repair cost ratio (μCRCR) representing consumers' repair behavior is demonstrated based on the change in the mean threshold (μA) representing consumers' propensity for repair. The baseline for mean threshold is 20%.

4. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The usage time of laptops is estimated based on the change in the consumers' propensity for repair (mean threshold, μA). The baseline for mean threshold is 20%.

5. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The usage time of laptops is estimated based on the change in the cost of spare parts (repair cost ratios). The baseline values for repair cost ratios can be found in Table 1.

6. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The 95% confidence interval of the usage time for designs 1 and 2

7. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The 95% confidence interval of the number of replacement during warranty time for designs 1 and 2

8. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The 95% confidence interval of the number of replacements after warranty time for designs 1 and 2

9. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Environmental impacts for the production stage of design 1, D1 scenario

10. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Single score of sustainability for the production stage of design 1, D1 scenario

11. Date of download: 10/18/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Environmental Evaluation of Product Design Alternatives: The Role of Consumer's Repair Behavior and Deterioration of Critical Components
J. Mech. Des. 2017;139(8): doi: /
Figure Legend:
A comparison between the environmental impacts associated with the entire life cycle of designs 1 and 2, D1 and D2 scenarios—including the production, usage, and waste treatment stages