Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Beam dump XPOC analysis

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Beam dump XPOC analysis"— Presentation transcript:

1 Beam dump XPOC analysis
Brennan Goddard AB/BT Dump system and its beam instrumentation Diagnostics – some terminology External Post Operation Checks (XPOC) requirements & scope What data Triggering and acquisition Interaction with sequencer, SIS, MCS etc. Archiving and retrieval Implementation With input from Mike, Julian, Jerome, Verena, Adriaan, Jorg, Etienne, … Draft Specification 17 Jan 2007

2 LHC beam dump system (LBDS)
Dump block Dilution kickers Passive diluter Extraction septum Passive diluter Extraction kicker 17 Jan 2007

3 Instrumentation (per ring)
BPMs For circulating beam Regular “lattice” BPMs at Q4 and Q5 L&R (4); Additional warm IR6 BPM MSD exit (1); Dedicated Interlock BPMs at TCDQ and Q4 (4); For extracted beam At entrance to TCDS/MSD and exit of MKB (2); Screens (for extracted beam only) At entrance of TCDS, exit of MKB and entrance of TDE (3); BLMs At MKD, TCDS, MSD, TCDQ and TCS (56 regular and 2 interlock); At MKB, TD vacuum line section changes (18); For TDE secondary shower profile Along and behind TDE (8 per beam) BCTs (for extracted beam only) At entrance to MKB (2) Abort gap monitor Uses signal from IR4 BSRT SR telescope and gated photon counting 17 Jan 2007

4 Correct LBDS operation
Interlock interrupts BIS 10 MHz and detected by LBDS interface Beam orbit in tolerance in IR6 Energy tracking working for kicker charging voltage levels RF rev. frequency signal correct for abort gap synch Trigger and Synch unit in LBDS gives power trigger fan-out All 15 MKD and 10 MKB correctly triggered All magnetic fields on to correct value at end of abort gap Kickers MKD MKB, MSD septa and Q4 quadrupoles Beam extracted and swept onto TDE No quench in Q4 or other IR6 magnets low transverse losses (tail scraping) at TCDS, MSD, TD line Low losses from swept beam in abort gap at TCDQ, Q4 17 Jan 2007

5 LBDS Diagnostics INTERNAL DIAGNOSTICS EXTERNAL DIAGNOSTICS
The internal surveillance of the LBDS system monitors the internal status, and when a fault is detected generates either alarms or beam dump actions depending on type of exception. After each beam dump action the LBDS conducts a series of Internal Post-Operation Checks IPOC, designed to verify that the beam dump hardware operated correctly. Both the internal surveillance and IPOC will be implemented by BT in supervisory systems of the LBDS itself, at PLC level. Act on BIS. No beam needed for these checks. EXTERNAL DIAGNOSTICS Each dump action must be followed by an External Post-Operation Check XPOC which is launched automatically and is designed to verify that the dump with beam was correctly executed. For long-term analysis purposes, comprehensive logging must be made of the data associated with the LBDS operation. The salient transient data associated with each dump action must be recorded by the LHC Post-Mortem system, which will have its own generic retrieval facility for beam fault analysis. Finally, a number of LBDS systems will generate alarms and warnings which must be incorporated into the CERN alarm system. The LHC control system must provide these external diagnostic systems. Only the XPOC is a ‘non-standard’ requirement, and will be implemented by LSA with BT/OP. 17 Jan 2007

6 Importance of XPOC for reliability
Critical subsystems (triggering, energy tracking) analysed numerically for reliability (Failure Mode Effect Analysis) Calculations confirmed that LBDS should reach SIL4 as required LBDS ‘unsafety’ 4.810-7 per year of operation Need to maintain redundancy (elements should not fail blind) Unsafety increases to 2 10-4 per year without POC diagnostics should ideally return the system to a “good as new” state play important role in ensuring the safety of beam dump system LBDS operational state depends on the XPOC result no high intensity beam operation is allowed unless a TRUE XPOC was obtained for the last dump with pilot/safe beam XPOC needs to be RELIABLE and AVAILABLE 17 Jan 2007

7 XPOC functional requirements
Automatically triggered after each dump (server with interface to timing?); Inhibit beam permit via SW channel to BIS when triggered and while busy; Acquire LHC configuration data (energy, intensity, mode, fill pattern, etc.); Acquire equipment data (BTV images, kicker waveforms, BLM signals, etc.); Acquire reference and tolerance data from MCS databases; Check consistency of equipment, configuration and reference data; Build ‘model’ for trajectory and sweep, from configuration/ measured data; Test measured data against model or (configuration dependant) references; Give beam permit via BIS if dump was as expected (XPOC TRUE); Withhold permit to BIS and generate alarm if XPOC returns FALSE; Display a summary of comparison results and allow diagnostic of problem; Provide summary data to LHC logging (and Post-Mortem?) systems; Provide facility to retrieve ‘reference’ and archived dump actions; Maximum time for acquisition + analysis + reaction is about 10 s 17 Jan 2007

8 Faults the XPOC must detect
LBDS BI Other diagnostic Asynchronous dump BLM,BPM IPOC MKD pre-trigger Missing MKD BPM,BTV MKD energy tracking error BPM,BLM,BTV MKB energy tracking error Missing MKB (dilution failures) Missing MKD redundant branch MKD re-triggering not working correctly MSD energy tracking error Beam emittance too large BLM Orbit in IR6 out of tolerance BIS (ITLK BPM) Direct BLM triggered IR6 access loop broken MSD power convertor trip BIS (FMCM) Over-populated abort gap AGM,BLM TDE over-temperature TDE monitoring TDE over/under pressure TCDQ-beam position out of tolerance SIS (Feedback) Abnormal vacuum pressure in MKD/MSD/TD lines VAC monitoring TCDQ/TCS out of position BIS (TCDQ posn) MKB/D internal diagnostics not working Beam instrumentation not working correctly Alarm? BETS not working correctly BLM, BPM 17 Jan 2007

9 Scope of XPOC comparison checks
Impact position and shape of the swept beam on the BTVDD; Extracted beam trajectory envelope and sweep form; Losses in extraction channel; Synchronization with the particle free gap; Dumped intensity vs circulating intensity; All LBDS sub-system summary status; IPOC correct execution; Origin of the dump request (BIS or LBDS internal); Environmental data (vacuum, cooling, TDE temperature & pressure) Kicker waveform shape (full analysis or summary information); Long-term drift of kicker waveform key parameters. 17 Jan 2007

10 Parameters for dump action model
LHC configuration (from LHC machine LSA database) Beam Energy ( GeV) Bunch intensity (0-100% nominal) Bunch filling pattern (many) Emittance (1 mm – 15 mm) IR6 orbit X,X’,Y,Y’ (X,Y: 0-10 mm, X’Y’: rad) Q4 gradient ( m-1) Beta functions at BTVDD (X,Y) (2500 – 7500 m) Layout data Element lengths and drift distances Kicker magnets MKD energy (x1) ( GeV) Active MKD kickers (x15) MKB energy (x1) ( GeV) Active MKB kickers (x10) Septum magnets MSD energy (x1) ( GeV) Synchronisation and abort gap population 17 Jan 2007

11 Reference data for comparison from MCS
MKD individual magnet reference functions of energy Rise time Current at 3.0 s Current at overshoot 1 Current at overshoot 2 Current at 90 s MKB individual magnet reference functions of energy Current at first maximum Current at first minimum Time for first zero crossing Time for second zero crossing BDI references/tolerances as function of energy Maximum losses Tolerance limits on BTVDD derived values H/V projection width (at half-maximum value) H/V projection centre Sweep length Tolerance limits on BPMD values Interlock BPM trigger thresholds Tolerance limits on extracted current 17 Jan 2007

12 Equipment and beam instrumentation data
MKD/MKB Kickers Kicker waveform summary information Set/read generator charging voltages Set/read generator trigger voltages IPOC results MSD septa MSD measured currents MSD FMCM status Beam Energy Tracking BETS Measured currents from DCCTs BETS Reference energy BETS Reference main voltage for MKB/Ds BETS Reference trigger voltage for MKB/Ds BETS Reference current for MSD/Q4 TCDQ/TCS Jaw up/down set/measured positions Interlock reference function value Cooling status & jaw temperatures TCDS cooling status temperature TDE cooling status, temperature & pressure Vacuum system status & pressures Mains/UPS status Relevant active alarms Beam losses Extraction channel losses during extraction TD line losses during extraction TDE losses during extraction Select LHC ring loss history before/during extraction Direct BLM losses before/during extraction BPMs Machine BPM orbit over ~100 turns Interlock BPM bunch positions over ~100 turns BPMSE bunch positions during extraction BPMD bunch positions during extraction BCT extraction vs circulating intensity measured filling pattern BTV screens BTVDD image & projections BTVD position/status BTVSE position/status Abort Gap Monitor measured gap population Issue: what level of redundancy is needed/desired between XPOC and SIS/BIS?? - e.g. do we check if TCDQ function/position/interlock status are all coherent? - if BIS/SIS fully checked and unchanging, should not be needed! 17 Jan 2007

13 Triggering the XPOC Conditioning of “request PM” event is needed and depends on whether a beam dump has been requested or not – Julian’s talk XPOC needed after EVERY beam dump Needed in cases where there will be NO PM trigger Inject and dump, intermediate beam during injection sequence, EOF,… Use (“request dump” OR “request PM”) events to trigger XPOC XPOC server with HW interface to timing system? 17 Jan 2007

14 Data acquisition In the case of a programmed dump…PM is suppressed
Cannot rely on PM data for the programmed dumps Should use triggered acquisition for equipment data XPOC subscribes to the equipment concerned Trigger Data Acquisition using “request XPOC data” event in timing table In the case of an emergency dump…. No “request dump” event…! Two possibilities: Make dedicated triggered acquisition in all cases….? PM data for E_dump PLUS triggered acquisition of data for programmed dump…? Need to set up and maintain 2 data acquisition pathways More complicated XPOC process (different data structures, response times, …) Unnnnngggggggggghhhh….. Propose (after several iterations) NOT to use PM data for XPOC. Use dedicated acquisition triggered for both E_dump and P_dump cases One data source and pathway with minimum complexity Overcome issue of diagnostics for badly-executed programmed dump with no PM, by extending scope, e.g. key BLMs (collimators, triplets) and BPMs (see JW) Might be easier to issue a “request XPOC data” event EVERY time the BIS loop breaks (while still conditioning the “request PM” event on mode etc.) 17 Jan 2007

15 Archiving and retrieval
Need to archive (& afterwards retrieve) ALL acquired data… a) Immediately write acquired data to SDDS structures before analysis ? Simplifies retrieval process (same methods for Automatic Analysis and Browse) Time response issues? b) Separate archiving process in parallel with Analysis Analysis XPOC ? May improve time response Two process subscribing to XPOC equipment for relevant data Need a ‘dump browser’ GUI for manual search for faults Look up and load data from any archived dump Regenerate “Model dump” from archived configuration data Reload references from archived data Re-run XPOC analysis on old data? Fiddle with model parameters Need to archive data, configuration and references for each dump Issues of archiving structure, persistency, … Use solutions developed for Post-Mortem? 17 Jan 2007

16 Interfaces CMW: XPOC subscribes to equipment device property for XPOC triggered data LSA LHC machine database: configuration data Sequencer LBDS operational state must be changed to “failed” following a FALSE XPOC result – and must ensure that dump is made without beam and then with pilot to re-validate the system. Must load timing table containing events for dump requests and XPOC data acquisition Alarms Generate FALSE result or warning when values close to tolerance limits) Acquire relevant alarms states (and recent history) MCS: adjustment of references and tolerances SIS: check consistency of references in XPOC and MCS Timing “request dump” and “request PM” events or (“request XPOC data”) trigger XPOC process and acquisition of relevant data Logging/SDDS database need to store all the data associated with each beam dump (SDDS?) Need to write out the XPOC results and ‘reduced/summary’ data (logging DB?) 17 Jan 2007

17 Data volumes Kicker systems Other systems Beam instrumentation
Measured kick waveforms (analysed in FE): ~4 Mb 40 Mb Summary information from IPOC: ~1 kb Other data (voltages, status, …): ~1 kb Other systems TDE, VAC, FMCM, PCs, TCDQ, TCS, … ~1 kb Beam instrumentation BLMs – interested in losses at extraction only ~1 kb BTVs – 1 screen per beam ~1 Mb BPMs – acquire ~100 turns, ~10 monitors per beam ~10 kb BCTs – all bunches, 3-4 monitors per beam ~10 kb Abort gap monitor, ~100 turns, 100 ns bins ~10 kb End up with some Mb dominated by kicker waveforms Kicker waveform analysis may be restricted ONLY to the IPOC in the kicker FEs Can anyway PM and log kicker waveforms – but would be nice to associate with dump event 17 Jan 2007

18 Implementation LSA project framework – Java applications
Shame that cannot directly reuse the LabView PM browsers etc Should at least learn from the concepts and features developed Can some of other components be re-used: SDDS convertors, …? Separation of analysis and dump event browser functionalities Requirements fairly well defined – some stuff still needed Details of equipment device properties and data structures Data reduction algorithms Comparison tests Definition of reference and tolerance tables Impact ‘known’ on sequencer, MCS, logging, triggering, timing, 17 Jan 2007

19 Priorities & timescales
Needed for beam commissioning Priorities for 2007 machine startup (Nov) Minimum XPOC analysis process with main features aimed at 450 GeV Acquire key equipment and configuration data Correct interfacing with CMW, sequencer, SIS, timing, MCS, logging Checks for key parameters BLMs, BPMD, BTVDD IPOC results For 2008 startup (spring) Ready with full system All data, references and configuration acquired Checks for all parameters Full interfacing with all other systems 17 Jan 2007

20 Some issues which spring to mind
Performance adequate with subscription to triggered acquisition? BLM buffers, BPMs for last turns before beam dump Requirements not too stringent: looking only for one or few turns, limited scope XPOC process in server with timing system interface? PM suppression for programmed dump, e.g. open BIC loop triggers RF PM buffer freeze, … Acquisition architecture and data flow? equipconvertorSDDSXPOC or equipXPOCconvertorSDDS Use SDA? Archiving of the data associated with each dump? Reuse of PM system components? LabView vs Java issues… Overlap of functionality with SIS/BIS? Redundancy can be beneficial, but needs to be selective and well documented Check acquiring triggered data in midst of PM data “storm” 17 Jan 2007

21 Fin XPOC  Post-Mortem Needed for programmed dumps when PM may be suppressed Triggered on “request dump” OR “request PM” event Defined and limited functionality: validate operation of dump with beam Seems preferable to have data flow for XPOC based on triggered acquisition of all necessary data, separate to PM Anyway needed for programmed dumps Would otherwise have two sources of data depending on dump type Avoids duplication and extra complexity Should be in a position to finish prototype application and check out the issues in the course of this year Specifications drafted (iteration needed once concept finalised) 17 Jan 2007


Download ppt "Beam dump XPOC analysis"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google