Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★

Published byRandolph Allen Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★"— Presentation transcript:

1 From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★
Figure 8. Colour–colour diagram showing g − i from the CFHTLS-D1 versus J − K<sub>s</sub> for sources with K<sub>s</sub> < 23.5 in VIDEO. The solid blue line denotes the stellar locus fit from (Baldry et al. 2010) offset by 0.1 mag in J − K<sub>s</sub> colour as described in the text. From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★ Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2012;428(2): doi: /mnras/sts118 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2012 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society 1

Download ppt "From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★"

Similar presentations

Cancer cachexia by J.N. Gordon, S.R. Green, and P.M. Goggin QJM Volume 98(11):779-788 October 17, 2005 © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University.

Cancer cachexia by J.N. Gordon, S.R. Green, and P.M. Goggin QJM Volume 98(11): October 17, 2005 © The Author Published by Oxford University.
© Oxford University Press 2008 9.3 How are the plates moving?

© Oxford University Press How are the plates moving?
Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3 but for x = 5.5.

Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3 but for x = 5.5.
From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation
Figure 1. Orbital evolution of the planetesimals and Jupiter-mass planet in simulation S1. The solid points show the planetesimals. The radii of the planetesimals.

Figure 1. Orbital evolution of the planetesimals and Jupiter-mass planet in simulation S1. The solid points show the planetesimals. The radii of the planetesimals.
Figure 1. HATLAS J (z = 2. 372, marked with vertical line)

Figure 1. HATLAS J (z = , marked with vertical line)
From: Ion chemistry in the coma of comet 67P near perihelion

From: Ion chemistry in the coma of comet 67P near perihelion
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 3. The hybrid simulations results

Figure 3. The hybrid simulations results
Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.

Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.
Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.

Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.
From: Blue-Light Hazard From Gas Metal Arc Welding of Aluminum Alloys

From: Blue-Light Hazard From Gas Metal Arc Welding of Aluminum Alloys
From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge

From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge
Figure 1 Timeline of the project.

Figure 1 Timeline of the project.
Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ2 density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black)

Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ2 density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black)
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups

From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.
Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google