Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bone Augmented With Allograft Onlays for Implant Placement Could Be Comparable With Native Bone  Khadijeh Al-Abedalla, DDS, MSc, Jesus Torres, DDS, PhD,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bone Augmented With Allograft Onlays for Implant Placement Could Be Comparable With Native Bone  Khadijeh Al-Abedalla, DDS, MSc, Jesus Torres, DDS, PhD,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Bone Augmented With Allograft Onlays for Implant Placement Could Be Comparable With Native Bone 
Khadijeh Al-Abedalla, DDS, MSc, Jesus Torres, DDS, PhD, Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes, DDS, MSc, PhD, Xixi Wu, DDS, MSc, Samer Abi Nader, DMD, MSc, Nach Daniel, DMD, BSc, MSc, Faleh Tamimi, BDS, MSc, PhD  Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  Volume 73, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015) DOI: /j.joms Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 A, Allograft blocks before surgical implantation. B, Alveolar ridge before onlay augmentation. C, Surgical placement of allograft onlays (first surgery). D, Retrieval of bone samples from onlay-augmented surgical sites and implant placements (second surgery). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.joms ) Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 2 A, Histologic section from the allograft group (original magnification, ×2.5). B, Magnified section (A, inset) showing newly formed bone within the allograft material (original magnification, ×10). C, Magnified section (B, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of newly formed bone, living osteoblasts, and empty lacuna of the graft cells (arrows; original magnification, ×20). D, Histologic section from control group (original magnification, ×2.5). E, F, Magnified sections (D, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of original alveolar bone and living osteoblasts (methylene blue and basic fuchsine stains; original magnifications, ×10 for E and ×20 for F). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.joms ) Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 2 A, Histologic section from the allograft group (original magnification, ×2.5). B, Magnified section (A, inset) showing newly formed bone within the allograft material (original magnification, ×10). C, Magnified section (B, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of newly formed bone, living osteoblasts, and empty lacuna of the graft cells (arrows; original magnification, ×20). D, Histologic section from control group (original magnification, ×2.5). E, F, Magnified sections (D, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of original alveolar bone and living osteoblasts (methylene blue and basic fuchsine stains; original magnifications, ×10 for E and ×20 for F). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.joms ) Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions

5 Figure 2 A, Histologic section from the allograft group (original magnification, ×2.5). B, Magnified section (A, inset) showing newly formed bone within the allograft material (original magnification, ×10). C, Magnified section (B, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of newly formed bone, living osteoblasts, and empty lacuna of the graft cells (arrows; original magnification, ×20). D, Histologic section from control group (original magnification, ×2.5). E, F, Magnified sections (D, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of original alveolar bone and living osteoblasts (methylene blue and basic fuchsine stains; original magnifications, ×10 for E and ×20 for F). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.joms ) Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions

6 Figure 2 A, Histologic section from the allograft group (original magnification, ×2.5). B, Magnified section (A, inset) showing newly formed bone within the allograft material (original magnification, ×10). C, Magnified section (B, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of newly formed bone, living osteoblasts, and empty lacuna of the graft cells (arrows; original magnification, ×20). D, Histologic section from control group (original magnification, ×2.5). E, F, Magnified sections (D, inset) showing the lamellar pattern of original alveolar bone and living osteoblasts (methylene blue and basic fuchsine stains; original magnifications, ×10 for E and ×20 for F). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.joms ) Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions

7 Figure 3 Flow diagram of number of participants and implants included in the second part of the study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.joms ) Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions

8 Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier charts representing survival function (success rate throughout follow-up period) of the native alveolar bone, autograft, and allograft groups. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.joms ) Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Bone Augmented With Allograft Onlays for Implant Placement Could Be Comparable With Native Bone  Khadijeh Al-Abedalla, DDS, MSc, Jesus Torres, DDS, PhD,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google