1. Matt Slick Inerrancy Copied from CARM.org under fair use terms:
Inerrancy means without error, non-errant. In Christianity, inerrancy states that the Bible, in its original documents, is without error regarding facts, names, dates, and any other revealed information. Inerrancy does not extend to the copies of the biblical manuscripts.

2. Inerrancy: Critical review
What Matt Slick has failed to state in this section is a very serious problem. 
THERE ARE NO LONGER ANY “original documents”!

3. CARM Inerrancy: Conclusion
All we have extant are copies (and copies of copies) of the original documents.  So is Matt Slick stating the ridiculous claim that he believes in the inerrancy of something that no longer exists?  Or is he affirming the non- inerrant status of the copies (and copies of copies) thereby, eliminating “inerrancy” completely?
       

4. CARM Inerrancy: Conclusion
In this section Matt Slick has no mention of any of the differing definitions of “inerrancy” or “biblical infallibility”.  Is he aware of them?  Or is he ignoring them?
       

5. CARM Inerrancy: Conclusion
Once again, we have shown Matt Slick's incompetency in his shallow minded approach not only to apologetics, but to theology as well. 

6. For More information: WWW.MATTSLICKFALLACIES.COM WWW.CARMFALLACIES.COM