Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nosocomial Pneumonias

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nosocomial Pneumonias"— Presentation transcript:

1 Nosocomial Pneumonias
IDSA/ATS 2016 Guidelines José Luis González, MD Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine

2 Outline Intro - Definitions & Diagnosing VAP & HAP treatment
De-escalating empiric therapy

3 IDSA/ATS 2016 Guidelines Management of Adults with Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Use of Gradings of Recommendations Assessment, Development & Evaluation (GRADE) No more HCAP Encouraging development of hospital-specific antibiograms Replaces 2005 guidelines

4 Definitions No gold standard
Pneumonia: new lung infiltrate w/ clinical evidence of infectious origin: New onset fever Purulent sputum Leukocytosis Decline in oxygenation

5 Definitions Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia HAP: VAP:
pna not incubating at time of hospital admission and occurring 48° post admission VAP: pna occurring 48° post endotracheal intubation

6 Sputum Samples Non-invasive sampling > invasive sampling (wk, lq)
Hold abx if Cxs result < threshold CFUs (BALs (wk, vlq) Tx based on microbiologic evidence rather than empirically (wk, vlq) Only 30% of resp infections due to MRSA in pts w/ +MRSA screen Meta-analysis: poor concordance between gram stains and final cultures Invasive techniques: BAL, mini-BAL (blind bronchial sampling) and PSB (protected specimen brush) Non-invasive techniques: spontaneous expectoration, sputum induction, nasotracheal suctioning, endotracheal aspirate if intubated PSB < 103 CFUs BAL < 104 CFUs ETA < 106 CFUs (Semi-quant: light, moderate or heavy) vs (104 , 105 or 106) There is an association between +MRSA screens and MRSA infection, but usually only in skin and soft-tissue infections

7 LAC-USC Antibiogram

8 Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Empiric Treatment

9 Organisms Gram Negative Bacilli Staphylococcus Aureus: MRSA vs MSSA
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: single agent vs double-coverage

10 VAP: Gram negative bacilli & MSSA
Cefepime 2g IV q8h or Piperacillin-Tazobactam 4.5g IV q6h Levofloxacin 750 IV qDay / Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV q8h Meropenem 1g IV q8h / Imipenem 500mg IV q6h If sensitive to polymixins, use IV polymyxin (colistin or polyB) and adjunctive inhaled colistin Aminoglycosides have poor lung penetration so avoid: gentamycin or tobramycin - tigecycline and doripenem were associated w/ worse outcomes

11 VAP: When to treat for MRSA (sr, lq)
IV abx within 90 days prior >10-20% or unknown MRSA rate LAC) Renal replacement therapy Hospitalized 5d prior to intubation Septic time of intubation ARDS preceding intubation LAC 34% MRSA Septic shock: change in SOFA > 2 + pressors + lactate > 2

12 Treating for MRSA Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV q8-12h or
Linezolid 600 mg IV q12h Avoid aminoglycosides due to poor lung penetration and increased risk of nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity Avoid colistin

13 VAP: When to treat with 2 antibiotics for pseudomonas (wr, lq)
IV abx within 90 days prior >10% resistance rates to single agent being considered LAC) Renal replacement therapy Hospitalized 5d prior to intubation Septic time of intubation ARDS preceding intubation No diff in mortality, clinical response, adverse effects or acquired resistance rates between regimens with one antipseudomonal agent vs 2. but data do not apply to all pts bcz most studies excluded pts colonized with resistant pathogens and patients at increased risk for resistant pathogens. Lower threshold for dbl coverage for pseudomonas than for MRSA because gram negs are more frequently implicated in VAP = increased rate of inadequate coverage

14 Agents with activity against pseudomonas
Cefepime 2g IV q8h or Piperacillin-Tazobactam 4.5g IV q6h Levofloxacin 750 IV qDay / Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV q8h Meropenem 1g IV q8h / Imipenem 500mg IV q6h

15 100 100 34% LAC-USC Antibiogram 87 87 81 76 87

16 Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
Empiric Treatment

17 HAP: Gram negative bacilli & MSSA
Cefepime 2g IV q8h or Piperacillin-Tazobactam 4.5g IV q6h Levofloxacin 750 IV qDay / Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV q8h Meropenem 1g IV q8h / Imipenem 500mg IV q6h If sensitive to polymixins, use IV polymyxin (colistin or polyB) and adjunctive inhaled colistin Aminoglycosides have poor lung penetration so avoid: gentamycin or tobramycin - tigecycline and doripenem were associated w/ worse outcomes

18 HAP: When to treat for MRSA (sr, vlq)
IV abx within 90 days prior >20% or unknown MRSA rate LAC) Septic shock Need for vent support due to pna 10% of HAP is MRSA

19 Treating for MRSA Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV q8-12h or
Linezolid 600 mg IV q12h

20 HAP: When to treat with 2 antibiotics for pseudomonas (sr, vlq)
IV abx within 90 days prior Septic shock Need for vent support due to pna Structural lung disease (bronchiectasis or CF) High qual. Gram stain w/ numerous predominant GNB Pseudomonas is the cause of about 13% of HAPs Other GN orgs = 22% Overall = 35%

21 Agents with activity against pseudomonas
Cefepime 2g IV q8h or Piperacillin-Tazobactam 4.5g IV q6h Levofloxacin 750 IV qDay / Ciprofloxacin 400mg IV q8h Meropenem 1g IV q8h / Imipenem 500mg IV q6h

22 VAP HAP Pseudomonas MRSA IV abx within 90 days prior
>10-20% or unknown MRSA rate Renal replacement therapy Hospitalized 5d prior to intubation Septic time of intubation ARDS preceding intubation >10% resistance rate to single agent being considered IV abx within 90 days prior >20% or unknown MRSA rate Septic shock Need for vent support due to pna Structural lung dz (bronchiectasis or CF) Gram stain w/ +++ predominant GNB Pseudomonas MRSA HAP pts tend to be less sick than VAP pts, thus pt w/ HAP and pseudomonal pna (13% of cases) means that if you guess wrong and don’t double cover, these pts are less sick and no evidence that this increases mortality

23 Use Pharmakokinetic Data for Dosing (wk, vlq)
3 RCTs and 4 observational trials: improved clinical cure rate Reduced mortality Reduced length of ICU stay Esp due to comorbidities of patients in the ICU

24 Duration of treatment VAP: 7 days (st, mq) HAP: 7 days (st, vlq)
1 meta-analysis 508pts (7-8d) showed no diff in: Mortality, recurrent pna, duration of vent, hosp stay Another 883pts (7-8d vs 10-15d) showed no diff in: Mortality, recurrent pna, duration of vent, length of ICU stay Subgroup of pseudomonas & Acinetobacter = slight increase in recurrence HAP: 7 days (st, vlq) No studies on HAP duration of therapy; recs based on VAP Increased recurrence in subgroup analysis (OR, 2.18; 95% CI ) Authors own meta-analysis including the two studies above showed no diff in subgroup analysis recommendation was not altered for these pt bcz mortality and clinical cure were not affected

25 Empiric vs Targeted therapy
Targeted > Empiric (st, lq) For pts w/ confirmed pseudomonas w/ known susceptibilities; ok to use monotherapy unless pt is: (wk, vlq) In septic shock At high risk of death No def of high risk of death: previously mentioned necessitating vent support High risk > 25% Low risk < 15% Consider pts w/ high SOFA score The exception is based on (a single) observational trial(s) For Acinetobacter species: tx w/ either carbapenem or ampicillin/sublactam

26 HAP & VAP: Should therapy be de-escalated? (wk, vlq)
6 trials: 1 RCTs, 5 observational trials When pooled, no diff in mortality 2nd RCT: some worse outcomes but pna subgroup = no diff Reasonable to de-escalate to single broad spectrum agent in pts who: Have negative cultures Are clinically improving 2nd RCT showed increase antimicrobial days and increased risk of superinfection, but in a subgroup of the pna patients, no difference was found

27 Ventilator Associated Tracheobronchitis
Ventilated patient with: Fever New/increased sputum production + endotrach aspirate cx (ETA ≥ 106 CFUs) And no radiographic evidence of pneumonia Do not treat (wk, lq)

28 Biomarkers: Procalcitonin (PCT)
Initiation LAC says: yes IDSA/ATS says: no (st, mq)  no studies comparing patient outcomes 6 studies w/ significant sources of bias: 67% sens, 83% spec Discontinuation Meta-analysis of 14 trials: no diff in mortality or tx failure 3 other RCTs: shorter duration of abx tx (9 vs 12d) w/o diff in outcomes Endotoxin mediated release stimulated by K-cells in the lung Also stimulated from inflammation or viral illness, but to a lesser extent 6 studies w/ 665 pts, 50% ultimately diagnosed w/ HAP/VAP AUROC = 0.76 most studies showed positive predictive value however varying methods for assay different cut-offs pts enrolled did not have legitimate diagnostic uncertainty A-priori cutoff: 90% sens and spec if 1000pts, this cutoff would result in 5% (50pts) pts incorrectly diagnosed w/ a pna and 5% of pts incorrectly diagnosed as not having one with current cutoffs: 8.5% (85pts) incorrectly with one and 16.5% (165pts) = incorrectly diagnosed w no pna Other outcomes measured in DC trials: vent, length of ICU stay, recurrence or resistance

29 Procalcitonin Algorithm @ LAC-USC
8.5% (85pts) incorrectly with a PNA and 16.5% (165pts) = incorrectly diagnosed without a PNA In pts at high likelihood for infection, I would NOT use procalcitonin. Also, if pt remains septic, I would not de-escalate therapy as per IDSA/ATS guidelines Finally, studies decreased abx use from 12d to 9 days. Guidelines recommend only tx x 7days If using this guide, I would omit pts w/ a diagnosis of pneumonia. (although most of the data on PCT is in PNAs) Procalcitonin Algorithm @ LAC-USC

30 Biomarkers Don’t use procalcitonin (PCT) to initiate therapy (st, mq)
PCT better than clinical criteria alone for de-escalation (wk, vlq) Don’t use sTREM-1, CRP, CPIS to guide therapy Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells: TREm-1 is a member of the Ig family and has been shown to be strongly expressed on neutrophils and monocytes infiltrating tissues invaded by bacteria for fungi. Recent studies show that it is elevated in non-infectious causes of inflammation too CPIS Modified clinical pulmonary infection score: temp, wbc, character of resp secretions, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and CXR findings

31 Summary HAP & VAP occur 2 days post inciting event
Obtain non-invasive cultures Use antibiogram Use pharmacokinetic data De-escalate if pt improves, once sensitivities result. Ok to use PCT

32 References Kalil AC, Metersky ML, et al. Management of adults with hospital- acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(5):e61–111. LAC + USC Antibiogram; accessed 12/5/2016 Holtom P, Spellberg B. PCT Algorithm for Initiating and Stopping Antibiotics in Adult Patients with Sepsis in the ICU; accessed 12/5/2016


Download ppt "Nosocomial Pneumonias"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google