Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Safe Loading and Cargo Securing

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Safe Loading and Cargo Securing"— Presentation transcript:

1 Safe Loading and Cargo Securing
Zagreb, 11th November 2010 Patrick Philipp Head – IRU Academy

2 Unsecure cargo is a major risk
Euro Contrôle Route (ECR) an association of 14 European countries for the inspection of road transport, notes that: 25% of all commercial vehicle accidents in Europe are caused by poorly secured loads. Over 2300 accidents per year are due to poor cargo securing.

3 Unsecure cargo is a major cost
Overloading is a key concern! Source: Europol

4 Comparison of Cargo Securing according to:
IMO/ILO/UN ECE (2001) Rev prEN (Jan 2009) EN (Dec 2003)

5 Different requirements in guidelines and standards

6 Guidelines and Standards for Cargo Securing
European Best Practice Guidelines on Cargo Securing for Road Transport IMO/ILO/UN ECE Guidelines for packing of cargo transport units (CTU’s) with IMO Model Course 3.18 Standard EN Load restraint assemblies on road vehicles – Safety – Part 1: Calculation of lashing forces Updated version Standard prEN (rev: ) Load restraining on road vehicles – Safety – Part 1 Calculation of securing forces

7 Cargo securing guidelines
IMO/ILO/UN ECE 2001 EN Dec 2003 Rev prEN Jan 2009

8 Differences in the basic principles in the guidelines and standards
Cargo Securing Differences in the basic principles in the guidelines and standards Item IMO/ILO/UN ECE EN Rev prEN Acceleration coefficients (road transport) - Forward - Sliding sideways - Tipping sideways + Direct lashings + Frictional lashings cx = 1.0 cy = 0.5 cy = 0.5 (FT=LC) cy = 0.5 (FT=STF) cx = 0.8 cy = 0.7 (FT=LC) cy = 0.7 (FT=STF) cy = 0.6 (FT=LC) cy = 0.5 (FT=STF) or cy = 0.6 (FT=LC/2) Safety factor in calculations of frictional (top over) lashings - Sideways and backward fs = 1.0 fs = 1.25 fs = 1.1

9 Differences in the basic principles in the guidelines and standards
Cargo Securing Differences in the basic principles in the guidelines and standards Item IMO/ILO/UN ECE EN Rev prEN Friction factor established by friction test - Frictional lashings - Direct lashings Static friction µs Dynamic friction µd = µs  fµ µd = µs  0.70 µ =µs  0.925 µ  fµ Conversion factor fµ for direct lashings fµ = 0,70 fµ = µd/µs 0.75 < fµ < 1.0 Internal friction Included Not included Coefficient of transmission (k-factor) k = 2 k =1.5

10 Differences in the basic principles in the guidelines and standards
Cargo Securing Differences in the basic principles in the guidelines and standards Item IMO/ILO/UN ECE EN Rev prEN Some differences in table of friction factors, e.g: - sawn wood against fabric base laminate/plywood - sawn wood against steel sheet - steel crate against fabric base laminate/plywood µ = 0.50 µ = 0.40 Not included µ = 0.45 µ = 0.30 Verification of the efficiency of securing arrangement by Calculations Static inclining test Dynamic driving test (road transport) Lashing protocol Included

11 Cargo securing examples

12 Cargo Securing example 1
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding Curtain sided trailer, aluminium floor and strong headboard Wooden boxes L B H Length = 13.6 m Height = 2.55 m Breadth = 2.48 m Quantity = 8 pieces H × B × L = 2 × 2 × 1.7 m Weight = kg/box Total cargo weight: 24.0 tonnes Web lashings LC = daN = 1.6 tonnes = 16 kN STF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN Friction between floor and cargo  = static = 0.4

13 Cargo Securing example 1
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding Rev prEN IMO/ILO/UN ECE where m = 3 tons g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 (table 2) cz = 1.0 (table 2) µd = µs × 0.7 = 0.28 (section 6.1) k = 1.5 (section 6.2) FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN α = 84.3º Answer EN n = 3.9 m = 3 tons g = 9.81 m/s2 µ = µest= 0.4 (table B.1) fs = 1.1 n = 1.02 n = 0.9 Equation (10) Equation (6) EU Best Practice Guidelines - Cargo Securing (p.108)

14 Cargo Securing example 1
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding 16 top over lashings (Two lashing / section) Rev prEN IMO/ILO/UN ECE EN 9 top over lashings (with supporting beam) Friction factor µ = 0.4 Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs = 1.1 Rev prEN 8 top over lashings (One lashing / section) 32 top over lashings (Four lashings / section) Reasons for the difference: Static friction s = 0.4 Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs = 1.0 Dynamic friction µd = 0.7  s= 0.28 Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 1.5 Safety factor fs = 1.0

15 Cargo Securing example 2
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping Curtain sided trailer with strong headboard Steel crates B H Side bottom blocking Blocking Length = 13.6 m Height = 2.55 m Breadth = 2.48 m Quantity = 99 pcs in 11 sections Cargo section dimensions: H × B × L = 2.4 × 2.4 × 1.2 m Weight = kg/section Total cargo weight: 22.0 tonnes H/B = (2.4/2.4) =1 Number of rows = 3 Web lashings LC = daN = 1.6 tonnes = 16 kN STF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN

16 Cargo Securing example 2
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping IMO/ILO/UN ECE EN Rev prEN EU Best Practice Guidelines - Cargo Securing (p.108) Equation (11) Equation (16) where m = 2 tons/section g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 or 0.6 (table 2) cz = 1.0 (table 2) d = 1.2 b = 0.4 w = 0.8 FT = STF or LC/2 ≈ 4 kN or 8kN N = 3 fs = 1.1 α = 90º where m = 2 tons/section g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.7 (table 2) cz = 1.0 (table 2) h = 2.4 w = 2.4 k = 1.5 (section 6.2) FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kn α = 90º Answer n = 0.9/section n = 5.4/section n = 0.9/section

17 Cargo Securing example 2
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping IMO/ILO/UN ECE 11 top over lashings (One lashing / section) Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs = 1.0 Internal friction considered EN Acceleration factor cy = 0.7 Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 1.5 Safety factor fs = 1.0 No instructions for internal friction 66 top over lashings (Six lashings / section) 11 top over lashings (One lashing / section) Rev prEN Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 or cy = 0.6 Lashing force FT = STF or FT = 0.5  LC K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs = 1.1 Internal friction considered Reasons for the difference:

18 Cargo Securing example 3
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping Curtain sided trailer with strong headboard Paper reels H2 H1 B1 B2 One layer Two layers Quantity = 36 reels in 12 sections H × B = 1.3 × 1.1 m / reel Weight = 650 kg / reel Total cargo weight: 23.4 tonnes H1/B1= (1.3/2.2)  0.6 H2/B2= (2.6/2.2)  1.2 Number of rows = 2 Static friction between floor and reel and between reels, static = 0.5 Friction factor = 0.46 (0.5  0.925) Length = 13.6 m Height = 2.55 m Breadth = 2.48 m Web lashings LC = daN = 1.6 tonnes = 16 kN STF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN

19 Cargo Securing example 3
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding where m1 = 1.3 tons (one layer) m 2 = 2.6 tons (two layers) g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) µ = µest= (Annex B) α1 = 85.6º α2 = 87.8º FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN fs = 1.1 Rev prEN IMO/ILO/UN ECE m1 = 1.3 tons (one layer) m2 = 2.6 tons (two layers) g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) µd = µs × 0.7 = 0.35 (section 6.1) k = 1.5 (section 6.2) α1 = 85.6º α2 = 87.8º EN n1 = 0.91/section n2 = 1.82/section No sliding Equation (10) Equation (6) EU Best Practice Guidelines - Cargo Securing (p.108) n1 = 0.20/section n2 = 0.39/section Answer

20 Cargo Securing example 3
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping - one layer Rev prEN IMO/ILO/UN ECE where m = 1.3 tons/section g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.7 g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) h = 1.3 w = 1.1 k = 1.5 (section 6.2) FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN α = 85.6º EN m = 1.3 tons/section g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 g or 0.6g (table 2) cy = 1.0 g (table 2) d = 0.65 b = 0.55 FT = STF or LC/2 ≈ 4 kN or 8 kN N = 2 fs = 1.1 α =85.6º Equation (16) Equation (11) EU Best Practice Guidelines - Cargo Securing (p.108) No tipping Answer

21 Cargo Securing example 3
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping - two layers Rev prEN IMO/ILO/UN ECE where m = 2.6 tons/section g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.7 g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) h = 2.6 w = 1.1 k = 1.5 (section 6.2) FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN α = 87.8º EN m = 2.6 tons/section g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 g or 0.6g (table 2) d = 1.3 b = 0.55 FT = STF or LC/2 ≈ 4 kN or 8 kN N = 2 fs = 1.1 Equation (16) Equation (11) EU Best Practice Guidelines - Cargo Securing (p.108) n2 = 0.5/section n2 = 4.6/section n2 = 0.7/section Answer

22 Cargo Securing example 3 Reasons for the difference:
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping IMO/ILO/UN ECE 9 top over lashings (One lashing / 4 tonnes of cargo to prevent tipping and wandering) Static friction s = 0.5 Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs = 1.0 Internal friction considered EN Dynamic friction µd = 0.7s= 0.35 Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 (sliding) and cy = 0.7 (tipping) Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 1.5 Safety factor fs = 1.0 No instructions for internal friction 36 top over lashings (five lashings/section when loaded in two layers to prevent sliding and tipping, and one lashing/section when loaded in one layer to prevent sliding) Rev prEN Friction factor µ = 0.45 Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 or cy = 0.6 Lashing force FT = STF or FT = 0.5  LC K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs= 1.1 Internal friction considered 10 top over lashings (five lashings / six sections loaded in two layers to prevent tipping, and one lashing / 1-2 sections of cargo loaded in one layer to prevent sliding) Reasons for the difference:

23 Cargo Securing example 4 Heat exchanger with steel feet
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping Truck with plyfa floor Heat exchanger with steel feet The heat exchanger is blocked in forward direction. H × B × L = 2.0 × 0.9 × 2.1 m Centre of gravity: h × b × l = 1.35 × 0.45 × 1.05 m Weight = 2000 kg = 2 tonnes h/b= (1.35/0.45) = 3.0 Number of rows = 1 Static friction µstatic = 0.4 and friction factor µ = 0.45 Length = 8. m Height = 2.55 m Breadth = 2.48 m Breadth between lashing points = 2.36 m Web lashings LC = daN = 1,6 tonnes = 16 kN STF = 400 daN = 0.4 tonnes = 4 kN

24 Cargo Securing example 4
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding IMO/ILO/UN ECE EN Rev prEN Equation (6) Equation (10) EU Best Practice Guidelines - Cargo Securing (p.108) where m = 2 tons g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) µd = µs × 0.7 = 0.28 (section 6.1) k = 1.5 (section 6.2) FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN α = 70º where m = 2 tons g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) µ = µest= 0.46 (Annex B) α = 70º FT = 0.4 ton ≈ 4 kN fs = 1.1 Answer n = 0.6 n = 2.7 n = 0.7

25 Cargo Securing example 4
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways tipping IMO/ILO/UN ECE EN Rev prEN EU Best Practice Guidelines - Cargo Securing (p.108) Equation (11) modified for centre of gravity off centre Equation (16) where m = 2 tons g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.7 g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) d = 1.35 b = 0.45 h = 2.0 w = 0.9 k = 1.5 (section 6.2) FT = 0.4 ton = 4 kN α = 70º where m = 2 tons/section g = 9.81 m/s2 cy = 0.5 g or 0.6g (table 2) cz = 1.0 g (table 2) d = 1.35 b = 0.45 w = 0.9 FT = STF or LC/2 = 4 kN or 6.5kN N = 2 fs = 1.1 α = 70º Answer n = 1.25 n = 30.0 n = 1.9

26 Cargo Securing example 4 Reasons for the difference:
Required number of top over lashings to prevent sideways sliding and tipping IMO/ILO/UN ECE 2 top over lashings Static friction s = 0.4 Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 Lashing force FT = STF K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs = 1.0 EN Dynamic friction µd = 0.7  s= 0.28 Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 (sliding) and cy = 0.7 (tipping) Lashing force FT = STF K-factor 1.5 Safety factor fs = 1.0 30 top over lashings 2 top over lashings Rev prEN Friction factor µ = 0.45 Acceleration factor cy = 0.5 or cy = 0.6 Lashing force FT = STF or FT = 0.5  LC K-factor k = 2 Safety factor fs = 1.1 Reasons for the difference:

27 Comparison between the different guidelines for road transport
Cargo Securing Comparison between the different guidelines for road transport

28 Comparison between the different guidelines for road transport
Cargo Securing Comparison between the different guidelines for road transport

29 SAFE ENOUGH! Cargo Securing IMO/ILO/UN EN 12195-1 ECE (Dec 2003)
(2001) EN (Dec 2003) Rev prEN (Jan 2009)

30 IRU Academy Checklist on Safe Loading and Cargo Securing
New!

31 IRU Academy Interactive Programme on Safe Loading and Cargo Securing
Coming soon!

32 Worldwide Excellence in Road Transport Training


Download ppt "Safe Loading and Cargo Securing"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google