Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Catastrophes Insurable vs. Non-Insurable Catastrophes

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Catastrophes Insurable vs. Non-Insurable Catastrophes"— Presentation transcript:

1 Catastrophes Insurable vs. Non-Insurable Catastrophes
History of Insured Losses from Catastrophes Reasons for Growth in Catastrophe Exposure How Insurers Deal with Catastrophe Exposure What Is Being Done to Help Industry Cope with Catastrophes Securitization of Catastrophe Risk

2 Insurable vs. Non-Insurable Catastrophes
Ideal Criteria for an Insurable Exposure 1 Large Number of Similar Exposure Units 2 Fortuitous Losses 3 Catastrophe Unlikely 4 Definite Losses 5 Determinable Probability Distribution 6 Economic Feasibility

3 What Makes a Loss Uninsurable?
1 Large Number of Similar Exposure Units If losses are concentrated in a particular area Earthquakes, Floods 2 Fortuitous Losses If location and timing of losses can be predicted Flooding downstream after upstream area affected Catastrophe Unlikely If potential loss could hurt financial condition of industry Tornadoes, riots can be covered War, nuclear disaster cannot be covered

4 History of Insured Losses from Catastrophes - 1

5 History of Insured Losses from Catastrophes - 2

6 History of Insured Losses from Catastrophes - 3
Significant change in size of catastrophes occurred starting in 1989 The ten largest insured losses have all occurred since 1989 Taking inflation into account, eight of the ten largest losses have occurred since 1989 Current estimates of possible losses New Madrid Fault Earthquake $116 billion California Earthquake $77 billion Florida Hurricane $76 billion Northeast Hurricane $21 billion

7 Reasons for Growth in Catastrophe Exposure
Weather Pattern Change Period of Unusually Good Weather (?) Recent Return to the Long Term Norm Population Growth in At Risk Areas for Hurricanes Southeastern seacoast Lowered Building Standards Lulled by Reduced Storm Activity Overwhelmed by Population Growth Mandates to Cover Earthquakes Impact of Catastrophe on Repair/Rebuilding Costs

8 How Insurers Deal with Catastrophe Exposure
Reinsurance Managing Exposures Sophisticated catastrophe modeling Limiting concentration of exposures Monitoring by zip code Higher deductibles Premium Increases Withdrawals from Some Markets

9 What Is Being Done to Help Industry Cope with Catastrophes
California Earthquake Authority Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (Floods) Homeowners Insurance Availability Act (1999) Not enacted yet Would provide catastrophe reinsurance Tax Deferred Catastrophe Reserves Proposals under consideration in Congress

10 New Developments Securitization of Catastrophe Risk
Exchange-traded catastrophe options Contingent capital Risk capital

11 Insurance Securitization
Impetus Insurance Markets $ Billion in Capital Financial Markets $10-15 Trillion in Capital Catastrophe Potential $ Billion Too Large for Insurance Markets Less than a 1% Impact on Financial Markets Need to Develop Mechanisms to Spread Catastrophe Risk More Widely 2

12 Securitization of Catastrophe Risk
Three Basic Approaches Exchange Traded Derivatives CBOT Cat Insurance Futures and Options Bermuda Commodities Exchange Cat Options Contingent Capital Line of Credit Contingent Surplus Notes Catastrophe Equity Puts Risk Capital Catastrophe Bonds 3

13 Contingent Capital Insurer Could Buy Put Options on Its Own Stock
Moral Hazard Puts Not Traded for Most Insurers Cat-Equity-Puts At least 17 trades to date for $4.7 billion of contingent capital 12

14 Cat-E-Puts Written by AON
Prenegotiated Option on a Firm’s Own Securities Triggered by a Catastrophic Event Buyer Pays Premium to Option Writer Option Writer Provides Post-event Equity Normally Written for 3 years 13

15 Benefits of Cat-E-Puts
Allows the buyer to protect its balance sheet Rating agencies view this approach favorably Cost compares favorably with reinsurance 14

16 Risk Capital Over $1.5 billion of risk capital raised since 1995
Typical case - pre-funded, fully collateralized Provides insurance company with additional capital and multiyear coverage for catastrophes Provides investors with diversification and high yields Investors include: Mutual funds Hedge funds Reinsurers Life insurers Money managers 19

17 Examples of Risk Capital
USAA raised $477 million in June, 1997 and $450 million in June, 1998 Created Residential Re, Ltd. Covers East Coast Hurricane Risk Swiss Re raised $137 million in July, 1997 Created SR Earthquake Fund, Ltd. Covers California Earthquake Risk 20

18 Pricing of Risk Capital
Comparison of interest rate differential between risky capital and risk free rate with the expected losses USAA Initial offer 9 times Later trading 6 times Swiss Re 6 times BB rated debt 2.2 times Emerging markets times Problem: This approach ignores the loss distribution. Catastrophe coverage has greater chance of total loss of principal than other debt. 25

19 Additional Points Concerning Risk Capital
Offshore subsidiary (Special Purpose Vehicle) used to avoid taxation of interest Insurers using this approach should expect litigation after a loss. This is common practice after a default on high yield debt. 26

20 Summary Catastrophes can be so large that the insurance industry may be unable to handle them under traditional method Securitization can be an effective way to handle catastrophe and other insurance risks This field is just beginning to develop Expertise needed in both insurance and finance 27


Download ppt "Catastrophes Insurable vs. Non-Insurable Catastrophes"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google