Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve–guided.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve–guided."— Presentation transcript:

1 Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease  Frederik M. Zimmermann, MD, Bernard De Bruyne, MD, PhD, Nico H.J. Pijls, MD, PhD, Manisha Desai, PhD, Keith G. Oldroyd, MD, Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD, Michael J. Reardon, MD, Olaf Wendler, MD, PhD, Joseph Woo, MD, Alan C. Yeung, MD, William F. Fearon, MD  American Heart Journal  Volume 170, Issue 4, Pages e2 (October 2015) DOI: /j.ahj Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

2 Figure FAME 3 flowchart. American Heart Journal  , e2DOI: ( /j.ahj ) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve–guided."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google