Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University (MSU), USA.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University (MSU), USA."— Presentation transcript:

1 Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University (MSU), USA.
Single-particle degrees of freedom in covariant density functional theory: the successes and challenges. Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University (MSU), USA. Motivation and introduction Impact of time-odd mean fields on single-particle states Comparison with experiment (at and beyond men field) Competition of particle-vibration coupling and tensor force Impact on nuclear extremes (neutron-drip line and superheavy nuclei) 6. Conclusions

2 For future ECT* workshops:
please, provide proper breakfast for nuclear physicists

3 1. Introduction

4 Covariant density functional theory (CDFT)
The nucleons interact via the exchange of effective mesons   effective Lagrangian Long-range attractive scalar field Short-range repulsive vector field Isovector field - meson fields Mean field Eigenfunctions

5 Densities Single-particle energies Klein-Gordon equations for bosons CDFT is the only nuclear structure theory with a potential of its connection to the low energy domain of QCD, the basic theory of the strong interaction !!!.

6 Non-relativistic Schrodinger
Approximations in the modelling of nuclear many-body problem. General approach (DFT level) Non-relativistic Schrodinger equation: Skyrme and Gogny DFT Relativistic Dirac equation: covariant DFT (CDFT) Range of interaction Zero range - point coupling models in CDFT (no mesons) - Skyrme DFT Finite range - meson exchange models in CDFT - Gogny DFT Effective density dependence CDFT : explicit (DD-ME2, DD-PC1) - non-linear (through the powers of mesons) (NL1, NL3*) Skyrme and Gogny DFTs: different prescriptions for density dependence

7 2. Impact of time-odd mean fields on the single-particle states

8 Nuclear magnetism (NM)=Time-odd (TO) mean fields
Pairing is neglected in the calculations Single-particle states are characterized by signature Abbreviations: NM – nuclear magnetism is included WNM – nuclear magnetism is neglected

9 the r-meson is very small in the majority of the cases
Dominance of the w-meson in time-odd mean fields isoscalar isovector The contribution of the r-meson is very small in the majority of the cases Weak dependence on the parametrization BT states: time-odd mean fields are defined with ~15% accuracy A.A., PRC 78, (08)

10 odd-mass nuclei: parametrization dependence
Impact of time-odd mean fields on binding energies of odd-mass nuclei: parametrization dependence W. Satula, Proceedings of Nuclear Structure'98 conference, Gatlinburg, Tenn., USA ENM-EWNM [MeV] Skyrme CDFT Ar-isotopes Additional binding due to NM (always attractive) only weakly depends on the covariant EDF. In Skyrme DFT calculations the time-odd mean fields can be both attractive and repulsive (sign even depends on mass region)

11 3-A. Different aspects of the single-particle motion

12 of two rotational bands
Relative (effective) alignments of two rotational bands depends both on the alignment properties of single-particle orbital(s) by which the two bands differ and on the polarization effects induced by the particles in these orbitals The impact of the particle(s) on kinematic and dynamic moments of inertia is well reproduced AA, G.A. Lalazissis, P. Ring, Nucl. Phys. A 634 (1998) 395. AA and P.Ring, Phys. Scripta, T88, 10 (2000)

13 Impact of particle(s) on charge quadrupole moments:
example of SD bands in the A~150 mass region Experimental and calculated relative charge quadrupole moments DQ0=Q0(Band)-Q0(152Dy(1)) of the 149Gd(1), 151Tb(1) and 151Dy(1). The detailed structure of the configurations of these bands relative to the doubly magic 152Dy core is given in column 2. AA, G.A. Lalazissis, P. Ring, Nucl. Phys. A 634 (1998) 395. This impact is rather well reproduced in non-relativistic and relativistic DFT Satula et al, PRL 88, 5182 (1996) M.Matev et al, PRC 76, (2007) R.W. Laird et al, PRL 88, (2002) On the contrary, the DQ0 quantity is not uniquely defined in phenomenological models based on the Nilsson or Woods-Saxon potentials

14 Effective mass of nucleon at the Fermi surface and
single-particle states (their energies and wave functions). Phenomenological potentials (Woods-Saxon, Nilsson) : m*(kF)/m=1.0 since they are fitted to experimental single-particle energies. However, The coupling of vibrations to nucleons moving in levels lying close to the Fermi energy of deformed nuclei is found to lead to a number of effects: (i) shifts of the single-particle levels of the order of 0.5 MeV towards the Fermi energy and thus to an increase of the level density (as a consequence m*(kF)/m ~ 1.4), (ii) fragmentation of the single-particle strength (spectroscopic factors S< 1) Non-rotating deformed nuclei: F. A. Gareev, S. P. Ivanova, V. G. Soloviev, S.I. Fedotov, Single—particle energies and wave functions of the Saxon—Woods potentials and nonrotational states of odd-mass nuclei in the region 150 < A < 190, Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei, v.4, issue 2 (1973) 357 (see table next page) Rotating deformed nuclei: P. Donati et al, PRL 84, 4317 (2000)

15 Phenomenological potentials (Woods-Saxon, Nilsson) : continuation
165Ho Skyrme DFT : m*(kF)/m = Inclusion of single-particle states into the fit of the force always leads to m*(kF)/m~1.0 Gogny DFT: m*(kF)/m = (D1S) Covariant DFT: mL*(kF)/m = (NL1) to 0.66 (NL3*) Landau effective mass M. Jaminon et al, PRC 40 (1989) 354

16 3-B. How do we extract the energies of the “single-particle” states:
“absolute” versus “relative” energies

17 How single-particle spectra are obtained in experiment
Core Binding energy Core - nucleon Core + nucleon Include polarization effects due to 1. deformation (def) and 2. time-odd (TO) mean fields as well as 3. energy corrections due to particle-vibration coupling (PVC)

18 is calculated fully self-
For each configuration (blocked solution) the binding energy Ei is calculated fully self- consistently (including also time-odd mean fields)

19 3-C. Review of the accuracy of the description of experimental data

20 particle-vibration coupling + TO, TE polarization effects
E. Litvinova, AA, PRC 84, (2011) NL3* parametrization particle-vibration coupling + TO, TE polarization effects

21 Statistical distribution of deviations of the energies of
one-quasiparticle states from experiment The description of deformed states at DFT level is better than spherical ones by a factor 2-3 (and by a factor ~1 (neutron) and ~2 (proton) as compared with spherical PVC calculations) Triaxial CRHB; fully self-consistent blocking, time-odd mean fields included, NL3*, Gogny D1S pairing, AA and S.Shawaqfeh, PLB 706 (2011) 177 Two sources of deviations: Low effective mass (stretching of the energy scale) Wrong relative energies of the states Similar problems in Skyrme and Gogny DFT

22 Deformed one-quasiparticle states: covariant and
non-relativistic DFT description versus experiment J.Dobaczewski, AA, M.Bender, L.M.Robledo, Yue Shi, NPA 944 (2015) 388

23 AA and O.Abdurazakov, PRC 88, (2013) AA, Phys. Scr. 89 (2014) 054001

24 proton or neutron pairing (b) Alignment properties of blocked
Increase of J(1) in odd-proton nucleus as compared with even-even 240Pu is due to blocking which includes: Decrease of proton or neutron pairing (b) Alignment properties of blocked proton or neutron state

25 3-D. Role of particle-vibration coupling: some important results.

26 The impact of particle-vibration coupling on spin-orbit splittings.
The inclusion of particle-vibration coupling decreases the accuracy of the description of spin-orbit splittings. E. Litvinova, AA, PRC 84, (2011) The absolute deviations per doublet are 0.34 MeV [0.50 MeV], 0.23 MeV [0.56 MeV] and 0.26 MeV [0.45 MeV] in the mean field (“def+TO”) [particle-vibration coupling (“def+TO+PVC”)] calculations in 56Ni, 132Sn and 208Pb, respectively.

27 The impact of particle-vibration coupling on pseudospin doublets.
Exp (protons) Exp (neutrons) def+TO def+TO+PVC PVC substantially improves the description of splitting energies in pseudospin doublets as compared with mean field calculations. Observed similarity of the splitting energies of proton and neutron pseudospin doublets with the same single-particle structure in medium and heavy mass nuclei can only be reproduced when the particle-vibration coupling is taken into account. E. Litvinova, AA, PRC 84, (2011)

28 Spectroscopic factors
The absolute values of experimental spectroscopic factors are characterized by large ambiguities and depend strongly on the reaction employed in experiment and the reaction model used in the analysis

29 Competion of quasi-particle vibration coupling with tensor force
4. Single-particle degrees of freedom: Competion of quasi-particle vibration coupling with tensor force AA, E.Litvinova, PRC 92, (2015)

30 Tensor force Schematic picture of the expectation values of the tensor operator S12 when the spins are either aligned with (prolate configuration) or perpendicular to (oblate configuration) the relative distance vector . The function f(r) is negative, favoring a prolate shape for the deuteron. Deuteron: S12=-1 less binding, unbound S12=+2, more binding, assumes prolate configuration

31 Tensor interaction in Skyrme DFT
Recent extensive review on effective tensor interaction – H.Sagawa and G. Colo, PPNP 76, 76 (2014). Sb (Z=51) isotopes e(ph11/2) – e(pg7/2) [MeV] Strongest “evidence” for effective tensor interaction from the energy splitting of spherical states Skyrme DFT - G. Colo et al, PLB 646 (2007) 227 e(ni13/2) – e(nh9/2) N=83 isotones

32 Other examples: CDFT and Gogny DFT
Relativistic Hartree-Fock - pion tensor coupling G. A. Lalazissis et al, PRC 80, (2009) Gogny D1S GT2 = D1S + plus tensor force - T. Otsuka et al, PRL 97, (2006)

33 The excitation energies of the lowest 2+ and 3- collective states
Sn nuclei in Skyrme QRPA B.G. Carlsson et al, PRC 86, (2012) Relativistic QRPA Neutron number N

34 Impact of quasiparticle-vibration coupling on the spectra
AA, E.Litvinova, PRC 92, (2015) NL3* covariant energy density functional

35 Relativistic quasiparticle-vibration coupling calculations:
(1) the NL3* functional and (2) no tensor interaction Our analysis clearly indicates that both QVC and tensor interaction act in the same direction and reduce the discrepancies between theory and experiment for the splittings of interest. As a consequence of this competition, the effective tensor force has to be weaker as compared with earlier estimates.

36 Fragmentation of the single-particle strength
J. P. Schiffer et al, PRL 92, (2004) – the states of interest are single-particle ones (S=1) J. Mitchell, PhD thesis, University of Manchester, (2012) – strong fragmentation of the single-particle strength (cannot be accounted at the DFT level) M. Conjeaud et al, NPA 117, 449 (1968) and O. Sorlin Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61, 602 (2008) also support low S~0.5 for ph11/2 state in mid-shell Sb isotopes B.P.Kay et al, PRC 84, (2011) PLB 658, 216 (2008)

37 Example of generic problems of many functionals: Deformed shell gaps at N=152 and Z=100 Towards spectroscopic quality DFT: Improvement of the functionals at the DFT level Accounting of (quasi)particle- vibration coupling 3. Inclusion of tensor interaction (not clear at this point)

38 4-A. Impact on nuclear extremes (neutron-drip line)
AA, S. Agbemava, D. Ray and P. Ring, PLB 726, 680 (2013) S. Agbemava, AA, D. Ray and P. Ring, PRC 89, (2014) AA, S.E. Agbemava, D. Ray, P. Ring ,PRC 91, (2015)

39 How to minimize the uncertainties in theoretical predictions?
AA, S. Agbemava, D. Ray and P. Ring, PLB 726, 680 (2013) S. Agbemava, AA, D. Ray and P. Ring, PRC 89, (2014) J.Erler et al et al, Nature 486 (2012) 509 How to minimize the uncertainties in theoretical predictions?

40 Single-particle states as the sources of uncertainties
AA, S.E. Agbemava, D. Ray, P. Ring PLB 726 (2013) 680 DD-ME2 DD-ME2 Rn (Z=86) NL3* drip line-diamonds

41 The shell structure still survives in neutron-rich nuclei

42 The SHE and two-neutron drip line – the common
source of uncertainties (single-particle states) DD-ME2 Rn (Z=86) NL3* drip diamonds Predictions of two-neutron drip line for DD-Med and DD-PC1 are closer to DD-ME2 than to NL3*

43 Neutron single-particle energies for the ground-state
Two-neutron drip lines: the impact of uncertainties in single-particle energies Neutron single-particle energies for the ground-state configurations of the Rn isotopes calculated at their equilibrium deformations as a function of neutron number N. Note that the transition to deformation removes the 2j + 1 degeneracy of the spherical orbitals. AA, S.E. Agbemava, D. Ray, P. Ring ,PRC 91, (2015) calculational scheme “B”

44 Reducing uncertainties for two-neutron drip line
Known nuclei Two-neutron drip line nuclei Thin lines – 10 CEDF, thick – 4 CEDF Solid–10 CEDF, dashed– 4 CEDF

45 Theoretical uncertainties are most pronounced for
transitional nuclei (due to soft potential energy surfaces) and in the regions of transition between prolate and oblate shapes. Details depend of the description of single-particle states

46 4. An extreme of superheavy nuclei
Detailed results in S. Agbemava et al, PRC 92, (2015) Covariant density functional theory: Reexamining the structure of superheavy nuclei

47 Theoretical uncertainties in the prediction of the
sizes of shell gaps. Thin lines – all 10 CEDF’s, thick – 4 CEDF (NL3*,DD-ME2, DD-MEd,DD-PC1) Mass dependence of single-particle level density (~A1/3) is taken into account

48

49 DD-PC1: Experimental Z=116, 118 nuclei are oblate PC-PK1: Experimental
Z=118 nucleus is spherical Other experimental SHE are prolate Open circles – experimentally observed nuclei

50 Potential energy surfaces in axially symmetric RHB calculations with separable pairing

51 The source of oblate shapes – the low density of s-p states

52

53 Why I never ventured for two-quasiparticle states?

54 2-quasi-particle states:
how they are important? Exp. Theory Setup: each theoretical single-particle level deviates from experimental one by 0.5 MeV a a Energies of 2-quasiparticle states can either be close to experiment or to deviate from experiment by ~ 1 MeV Single-particle energies b c b c However, even this picture is considerably simplified, see next slide

55 2-quasi-particle states:
Continuation 1 The 1-qp (odd nuclei) and 2-qp (even-even and odd-odd) spectra will be stretched as compared with experiment in self-consistent approaches based on low-effective mass of nucleon (see A.V.Afanasjev et al, PRC 67 (2003) for 1-qp spectra) 2. Time-odd effects have to be included. There is considerable uncertainty in their definition in Skyrme type models 3. There are the cases of the mixing of 2-neutron qp and 2-proton qp states. This type of mixture have to be included in the calculations or only the cases where such mixing is not important are considered. 4. The admixtures of vibrational states to some 2-qp states cannot be neglected

56 2-quasi-particle states:
Continuation 2: Gallagher-Moszkowski splitting Intrinsic states of 2 protons in 2-qp proton state - the projections of the single-quasiparticle angular momentum on the symmetry axis due to residual p-p (or n-n) interaction of unpaired particles typically several hundreds keV’s but could reach 0.5 MeV in rare earth region (A.Goel et al, PRC 45, 221 (1992)) Cannot be treated in the 1D-cranking models since no projections K+, K- on the symmetry axis are considered no residual interaction of unpaired nucleons is included UNRESOLVED PUZZLE: the parameters of the residual interaction of unpaired nucleons are completely different in even-even and odd-odd nuclei

57 Conclusions: Different nuclear phenomena are well described in the
CDFT framework at and beyond the mean field level. 2. At present stage, we can also estimate theoretical uncertainties and their propagation beyond the known region of nuclei 3. Many theoretical uncertainties emerge from inaccuracies in the description of the single-particle states. At present, this is a real bottleneck of the DFT models (both relativistic and non-relativitic ones). 4. Note that different phenomena/observables or regions of nuclear chart are differently affected by the uncertainties in the single-particle energies. For example, the descriptive/predictive power for rotational systems is not strongly affected by them.

58

59 Spectroscopic factors

60 to the single-particle energies
The danger of the fit of the model parameters on the DFT level to the single-particle energies M. Zalewski et al, PRC 80, (2009) and PRC 77, (2008). Skyrme DFT A direct fit of the isoscalar spin-orbit (SO) and both isoscalar and isovector tensor coupling constants to the f5/2-f7/2 SO splittings in 40Ca, 56Ni, and 48Ca nuclei requires a drastic reduction of the isoscalar SO strength and strong attractive tensor coupling constants. The PVC changes SO splitting in the f5/2-f7/2 doublet by 1.5 MeV

61 Systematic theoretical uncertainties are defined by the spread
(the difference between maximum and minimum values of physical observable obtained with employed set of CEDF’s). NL3*, DD-ME2, DD-MEd, DD-PC1 [ also PC-PK1 in superheavy nuclei ]

62 Theoretical errors/uncertainties in description/predictions
of physical observables Systematic errors/uncertainties apply to a set of the functionals - related to the choice of the basic physics behind the functional Statistical errors/uncertainties - apply only to a given functional - due to choice of experimental data and the selection of adopted errors in the fitting protocol (the latter is to a degree subjective especially for the quantities of different dimensions) S. Brandt, Data analysis. Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers. (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014). 2. J. Dobaczewski et al, J. Phys. G 41 (2014)

63 These values are comparable or somewhat better than the
ones obtained in systematic Hartree–Fock+BCS calculations of deformed nuclei with SIII, SkM* and SLy5 Skyrme forces and FRDM calculations employing phenomenological folded-Yukawa potential [L. Bonneau et al, PRC 76 (2007) ], which show the agreement with experiment at about 40% level.

64 DFT calculations suggest that band 1 in 158Er is observed up to spin around 75
AA, Yue Shi, W.Nazarewicz, PRC 86, (R) (2012)

65 The impact of particle-vibration coupling on spin-orbit splittings:
the comparison with Skyrme PVC for neutron subsystem of 208Pb The change of spin-orbit splitting induced by PVC Covariant PVC Skyrme PVC doublet 3d5/2-3d3/2 +0.14 +0.15 3p3/2-3p1/2 -0.16 -0.15 2g9/2-2g7/2 +0.32 -0.1 2f7/2-2f5/2 -1.0 -0.6 2i13/2-1i11/2 -0.75 Skyrme PVC G.Colo et al, PRC 82, (2010)

66 to the single-particle energies
The danger of the fit of the model parameters on the DFT level to the single-particle energies M. Zalewski et al, PRC 80, (2009) and PRC 77, (2008). Skyrme DFT A direct fit of the isoscalar spin-orbit (SO) and both isoscalar and isovector tensor coupling constants to the f5/2-f7/2 SO splittings in 40Ca, 56Ni, and 48Ca nuclei requires a drastic reduction of the isoscalar SO strength and strong attractive tensor coupling constants. The PVC changes SO splitting in the f5/2-f7/2 doublet by 1.5 MeV


Download ppt "Anatoli Afanasjev Mississippi State University (MSU), USA."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google