Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ENGM 742: Engineering Management and Labor Relations

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ENGM 742: Engineering Management and Labor Relations"— Presentation transcript:

1 ENGM 742: Engineering Management and Labor Relations
Decision Making

2 Categories of Decision Making Tools
Routine vs. Nonroutine Objective vs. Bounded Rationality Level of Certainty

3 Decision Making Under Certainty
Linear Program: Used to determine optimal allocation of an organization’s limited resources State the problem Decision Variables Objective function Constraints OR Web:

4 Sec. 3.1Alt. Prototype Problem
Determine the appropriate number of tractors and shakers to make so as to maximize total profit. Constraints Do not exceed demand for either product Do not exceed capacity of assembly area

5 Sec. 3.1Alt. Model Variables Profit
X1 = number of tractors to manufacture X2 = number of shakers to manufacture Profit Z = 3X1 + 5X2 (in $1,000’s)

6 Sec. 3.1Alt. Model Constraints Demand for tractors X1 < 8,000
Demand for shakers X2 < 6,000 Capacity of Assembly 3X1 + 4X2 < 36,000 Non-negativity X1 > 0 , X2 > 0

7 Sec. 3.1Alt. Model Max Z = 3X1 + 5X2 s.t. X1 < 8,000 X2 < 6,000

8 Sec. 3.2 Some Terminology Corner Point Feasible Sol. (CPF) (0,6) (4,6)
8 6 4 2 Corner Point Feasible Sol. (CPF) (0,6) (4,6) (8,3) (8,0) (0,0)

9 Decision Making Under Risk
Expected Value Sum: (probability of future * value of future) Decision Trees Graphical method for finding the expected value Queuing Simulation

10 K-Corp 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 No Competition (.8) New Design
Re-engineer New Design do nothing No Competition (.8) Competition (.2) Competition (.5) No Comp. (.5) New do no No Comp. (.3) Comp. (.7) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50

11 K-Corp (60) (38) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 No Competition (.8)
Re-engineer New Design do nothing No Competition (.8) Competition (.2) Competition (.5) No Comp. (.5) New do no No Comp. (.3) Comp. (.7) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 (60) (38)

12 K-Corp (60) [60] (38) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 No Competition (.8)
Re-engineer New Design do nothing No Competition (.8) Competition (.2) Competition (.5) No Comp. (.5) New do no No Comp. (.3) Comp. (.7) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 (60) [60] (38)

13 K-Corp (82) (50) (60) [60] (38) (-50) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50
Re-engineer New Design do nothing No Competition (.8) Competition (.2) Competition (.5) No Comp. (.5) New do no No Comp. (.3) Comp. (.7) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 (82) (50) (60) [60] (38) (-50)

14 K-Corp (82) [82] (50) (60) [60] (38) (-50) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50
Re-engineer New Design do nothing No Competition (.8) Competition (.2) Competition (.5) No Comp. (.5) New do no No Comp. (.3) Comp. (.7) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 (82) [82] (50) (60) [60] (38) (-50)

15 K-Corp (38) (60) [60] (82) (50) (-50) [82] 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50
Re-engineer New Design do nothing No Competition (.8) Competition (.2) Competition (.5) No Comp. (.5) New do no No Comp. (.3) Comp. (.7) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 (38) (60) [60] (82) (50) (-50) [82]

16 K-Corp (38) (60) [60] (82) (50) (-50) [82] 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50
Re-engineer New Design do nothing No Competition (.8) Competition (.2) Competition (.5) No Comp. (.5) New do no No Comp. (.3) Comp. (.7) 125 -90 40 60 80 20 -50 (38) (60) [60] (82) (50) (-50) [82]

17 Decision Making Under Uncertainty
Maximax Maximin Equally likely Aspiration-Level

18 Aspiration-Level Aspiration: max probability that payoff > 60,000
P{PA1 > 60,000} = 0.8 P{PA2 > 60,000} = 0.3 P{PA3 > 60,000} = 0.3 Choose A2 or A3

19 Maximin Select Aj: maxjminkV(jk)
e.g., Find the min payoff for each alternative. Find the maximum of minimums Sell Land Choose best alternative when comparing worst possible outcomes for each alternative.

20 Bayes’ Decision Rule E[A1] > E[A3] > E[A2] choose A1

21 Forecasting Essential preliminary to effective planning
Engineering manager must be concerned with both future markets and future technology

22 Why Forecasting? New facility planning Production planning
Work force scheduling Sensitivity analysis

23 Long Range Forecasts Design new products
Determine capacity for new product Long range supply of materials

24 Short Range Forecasts Amount of inventory for next month
Amount of product to produce next week How much raw material delivered next week Workers schedule next week

25 Sales Forecast

26 Sales Forecast

27 Sales Forecast

28 Sales Forecast

29 Forecasting Quantitative Methods
Time Series Methods Moving Average Weighted Moving Average Exponential Smoothing Association or Causal Method Multiple Regression

30 Forecasting Qualitative Methods
Judgment Methods Expert Opinion Delphi Historical Counting Methods Market Testing Market Survey

31 Delphi Method Eliminates effects of interactions between members
Experts do not need to know who other experts are Delphi coordinator asks for opinions, forecasts on subject

32 Which Method? Textbook authors suggest: Select a few methods
Make forecasts Take simple average

33 Forecasting New Products
First use judgmental Expert opinions Consumer intentions

34 Management Science Characteristics
Systems view of the problem Team approach Emphasis on use of formal mathematical models and statistical and quantitative techniques

35 Management Science Process
Formulate the Problem Construct a Mathematical Model Test the Model Derive a Solution from the Model Apply the Model’s Solution to the Real System

36

37 For Review Compare and contrast mission and vision statements. Provide an example of how each is used by middle managers. Which of the forces in Porter’s five forces model is the most important in making decisions? Why? What role do goals and objectives play in the strategic planning process? Provide one example of how a forecast can be used to help management decision making and one example of how a forecast can mislead a management decision.


Download ppt "ENGM 742: Engineering Management and Labor Relations"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google