1. Quantitative Reasoning Task Force
Final Report
15 September 2016
Guiding Principle:
Educational Policy must balance access and opportunity to achieve equity.

2. Recommendation I
Define quantitative reasoning

3. Recommendation I
The Task Force proposes this general definition for quantitative reasoning: The ability to reason quantitatively is a stable combination of skills and practices involving: (i) the ability to read, comprehend, interpret, and communicate quantitative information in various contexts in a variety of formats; (ii) the ability to reason with and make inferences from quantitative information in order to solve problems arising in personal, civic, and professional contexts; (iii) the ability to use quantitative methods to assess the reasonableness of proposed solutions to quantitative problems; and (iv) the ability to recognize the limits of quantitative methods. Quantitative reasoning depends on the methods of computation, logic, mathematics, and statistics.

4. Recommendation II
Revise quantitative reasoning requirements

5. Recommendation II - Perspective
Task Force took the view that quantitative reasoning is more than just a single course taken to satisfy a general education requirement. It is the sum total of quantitative work necessary to support a student’s major, interests, career and civic responsibilities.

6. Recommendation IIA
Separate foundational and baccalaureate quantitative reasoning requirements. The Task Force recommends ending the use of prerequisite language to impose a de facto foundational quantitative reasoning requirement. Instead it recommends defining separate foundational and baccalaureate requirements that are reasonable and equitable.

7. Recommendation IIB
Define baccalaureate quantitative reasoning. To earn a baccalaureate degree from the California State University, students shall: (i) develop and demonstrate a proficient and fluent ability to reason quantitatively in a broad spectrum of the contexts defined by California State Standards for High School; (ii) develop and demonstrate a general understanding of how practitioners and scholars solve problems quantitatively in a range of disciplines; (iii) develop and demonstrate an in-depth understanding of how practitioners and scholars solve problems quantitatively in a specialized area (e.g., the major); and (iv) be prepared to develop their ability to reason quantitatively after graduation in the various contexts defined by personal, civic, and professional responsibilities.

8. Recommendation IIC
Upon entering the California State University in pursuit of a baccalaureate degree, students will be prepared to develop their ability to reason quantitatively in the broad spectrum of courses involving quantitative reasoning offered within the CSU (including, but not limited to, B4 courses). In particular, a student who has satisfied the foundational quantitative reasoning requirement shall have:
Demonstrated proficiency and fluency in the combined skills found in the California State Standards for K– 8, Algebra 1, and Integrated Math 1;
Practiced the skills in the K-12 California State Standards for Mathematics in a variety of contexts that broaden, deepen or extend K-8, Algebra 1 and Integrated Math 1 skills,
Continued

9. Recommendation IIC continued
Developed the eight Common Core mathematical practices, which are the abilities to:
  Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them
  Reason abstractly and quantitatively
  Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others
  Model with mathematics
  Use appropriate tools strategically
  Attend to precision
  Look for and make use of structure
  Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

10. Recommendation III
Ensure equitable access and opportunity to all CSU students

11. Recommendation IIIA
Promote equity, access and opportunity. The Task Force recommends that equitable policies be established to provide transfer and developmental math students with increased access to quantitative reasoning courses that can open up opportunities in these students’ majors, interests, careers, and civic lives.

12. Recommendation IIIB
Require four years of high school quantitative reasoning. The Quantitative Reasoning Task Force recommends that four years of high school quantitative reasoning coursework be required as part of the CSU admissions criteria (per ASCSU Resolution AS /APEP).

13. Recommendation IIIC
Ensure early and appropriate quantitative reasoning courses for CSU first-time freshmen. The Task Force recommends reevaluating quantitative reasoning requirements in the context of the student’s educational goals and proficiency at entry. For first-time freshmen in the CSU, it therefore recommends:
Foundational quantitative reasoning proficient students shall take a baccalaureate quantitative reasoning class within the first two terms at the CSU. Options shall exist in the context of the student’s major and interests.
Foundational quantitative reasoning not proficient students shall demonstrate proficiency within two terms of enrollment via a CSU-approved method. They shall take a baccalaureate quantitative reasoning class within two semesters of demonstrating proficiency. Options shall exist in the context of the student’s major and interests. This recommendation is intended to accommodate corequisite remediation, at the option of the institution providing the instruction.

14. Recommendation IIID
Establish equitable articulation of quantitative reasoning credit for transfer students. Community college students should be assessed by the community colleges as proficient or not proficient in foundational quantitative reasoning in alignment with the standards above. Prior to transfer, they should demonstrate foundational quantitative reasoning proficiency and earn the appropriate minimum grade in a course that transfers for B4 credit. Such students will not necessarily be considered proficient in baccalaureate quantitative reasoning, as certain campuses may require upper division work for this designation. Articulation for foundational quantitative reasoning proficiency will follow the existing approval process for B4 transfer approval. The Task Force supports the creation of options for both foundational and baccalaureate quantitative reasoning that teach skills and practices in the context of the student’s major and interests.

15. Recommendation IV
Create a CSU “Center for the advancement of instruction in quantitative reasoning”.

16. Recommendation IV
As soon as possible, the CSU should create a Center for Advancement of Instruction in Quantitative Reasoning to act on the Task Force’s current and subsequent findings, and to support the high-quality instruction in high schools, community colleges, and public universities that will better serve the state.