Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tumwikirize WA., Ekwaru JP, Mohammed K., Ogwal-Okeng JW, Aupont O.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Tumwikirize WA., Ekwaru JP, Mohammed K., Ogwal-Okeng JW, Aupont O."— Presentation transcript:

1 Tumwikirize WA., Ekwaru JP, Mohammed K., Ogwal-Okeng JW, Aupont O.
IMPACT OF FACE-TO-FACE EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION ON IMPROVING THE MANAGEMENT OF ARI IN PRIVATE PHARMACIES AND DRUG SHOPS IN UGANDA: Tumwikirize WA., Ekwaru JP, Mohammed K., Ogwal-Okeng JW, Aupont O. INRUD Uganda and Makerere University Project supported as part of the Joint Initiative on Improving Use of Medicine under a grant from ARCH

2 BACKGROUND Private pharmacies and drug shops important sources of drugs in Uganda Outlets characterized by high level of inappropriate dispensing practices. Inadequate knowledge of outlet staff identified as a major contributor to such practice Face-to face educational interaction with counter attendants (C/A) believed to be amongst strategies capable of improving the practices at outlets.

3 OBJECTIVES General objective: Specific Objectives:
To assess the impact of an educational intervention aimed at improving the management of ARI in children under-five by counter attendants at private pharmacies and drug shops in Uganda. Specific Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the intervention on:- . C/As’ assessment of child’s illness. . Their Prescribing and dispensing practices . C/As’ advices given on home care management of ARI

4 METHODS Quasi-experimental research design with comparison groups Survey of 191 drug outlets in Kampala District: 27 pharmacies & 164 drug shops Use of simulated clients and case scenarios of a children with either mild or severe ARI An educational intervention targeting counter attendants at the drug outlets

5 Practices asking about specific questions
RESULTS Changes in the assessment of children with ARI at the drug outlets Types of ARI Types of questions Intervention (n=84) Control (n= 87) Group Comparison Practices asking about specific questions Pre Post Difference Sig.* MILD ARI Age of child 98.8% 93.2% 95.5% -2.3% 0.79 Duration of illness 20.2% 25% 62.2% 74.8% -7.8% 0.62 Previous medical visits 22.6% 10.7% 17.2% 19.7% -14.4% 0.08 Previous medication 50% 53.6% 41.3% 48.5% -3.6% 0.77 Presence of fever 26.2% 16.7% 13.8% 19.6% -15.3% Difficulty in breathing 4.8% 1.1% 5.7% -9.4% n/a Nature of cough 21.4% 13.1% 26.6% 27.7% 0.27 SEVERE ARI 96.5% 100% 93.8% -1.5% 75.3% 67.1% 71.6% 77.8% 0.15 11.7% 16.5% 7.4% -7.5% 0.26 54.1% 48.2% 53.1% -17.9% 0.10 28.2% 35.3% 23.5% 35.8% -5.2% 0.58 4.7% 7.1% 6.2% 3.6% 0.49 21.2% 24.7% 12.4% 32.1% -16.2% 0.04 * Significance level estimated at p-value less than 0.05

6 Practices dispensing a particular drug
RESULTS (cont.) Changes in dispensing patterns of drugs used for ARI at the drug outlets Types of ARI Drug type Intervention (n=84) Control (n= 87) Group Comparison Practices dispensing a particular drug Pre Post Difference Sig.* MILD ARI An antibiotic 40.5% 36.9% 52.9% 47.1% 2.2% 0.75 Co-trimoxazole 23.8% 17.9% 31% 23% 2.1% 0.82 Amoxycillin 10.7% 21.4% 10.3% 18.4% 2.6% 0.65 Ampicillin 7.1% 2.4% 11.5% 3.4% 0.90 Cough syrup 59.5% 58.3% 49.4% 58.6% -10.4% 0.28 SEVERE ARI 58.8% 70.6% 55.6 79% -11.6% 0.21 17.6% 36.5% 28.4 29.6% 17.7% 0.06 25.6% 18.8% 13.6 35.8% -29% 0.00 9.4% 8.2% 11.1 7.4% 2.5% 0.70 40% 48.2% 50.6 37% 21.8% 0.05 * Significance level estimated at p-value less than 0.05

7 RESULTS (Cont.) Information on dispensed drugs: daily dose the only instruction. Advice for home: plenty of oral fluids was the commonest instruction for both categories of ARI, higher in the intervention gp. Advice on referral: for mild ARI more in the comparison gp., for severe ARI decreased in both gps.

8 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Assessment of the child’s illness:Inadequate for both mild and severe ARI. Treatment of ARI: not follow recommended treatment guidelines. Intervention did not result in improvement in management of ARI. Private drug outlets will remain a major source of care in Uganda. Policy implication: Combination of regulatory & educational interventions.

9 THANK YOU FOR LISTENING


Download ppt "Tumwikirize WA., Ekwaru JP, Mohammed K., Ogwal-Okeng JW, Aupont O."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google