1. Social Security Works
Findings from an Election Eve/Night Survey of 1,200 Likely Voters Nationwide

2. Survey Methodology
Lake Research Partners designed and administered this pre-election and election night omnibus survey, which was conducted by phone using professional interviewers. The survey reached a total of 1,200 likely, registered voters nationwide. The sample consisted of 1,000 interviews among voters who were reached on landline phones and an oversample of 200 interviews among voters reached on cell phones. The survey was conducted October 31st through November 2nd, 2010.
Telephone numbers for the base sample were drawn from a listed voter sample and the cell phone oversample was drawn from a listed sample. The sample was stratified geographically based on the proportion of likely voters in each region. Data were weighted to reflect the aggregated "national" Congressional vote as reported in the 2010 exit polls, as well as by gender, party identification, ideology, marital status, race, region, and probability of selection and phone usage.

3. Strategic Summary
In the November mid-terms, Democrats lost seniors by historic proportions—21 points. Even in 1994, Democrats only lost seniors by 2 points.
The survey reveals Democrats no longer have the advantage they traditionally have enjoyed on Social Security. However, candidates who made Social Security an issue often saved their seats and voters who say Social Security was a top voting issue voted more for Democratic candidates.
As we have seen in previous work, voters see little relationship between the deficit and Social Security.
Voters strongly oppose cutting Social Security benefits, even under the rationales of reducing the deficit or making the program more solvent in the long run. They oppose cutting benefits for those earning above $60,000 and they oppose raising the retirement age, especially when the specific retirement age of 69 is referenced. This includes voters of all ages and partisan groups, including Republicans and Tea Party supporters.
The issue of taxes is more mixed and shows partisan polarization, triggered sometimes more by views on taxes rather than views on Social Security.
There is strong bipartisan support, however, on lifting the cap to impose Social Security taxes on all wages above $106, 800. Support for this is stronger when both employers and employees are taxed. 3

4. Credibility on Social Security
Democrats do not enjoy their traditional advantage when it comes to who would be better on Social Security. Yet, among voters who say Social Security and retirement security was the most important issue in their vote in the mid-term elections, more than half voted for a Democratic Congressional candidate.

5. The economy dominated voters’ concerns in this election, followed by jobs, health care, Social Security and retirement security, the federal budget deficit, and education. The economy became the umbrella concern for voters in this election, with retirement security being an important component of retirement concerns.
Among voters who say Social Security was their most important election issue:
--55% voted for a Democratic Congressional candidate
--42% voted for a Republican candidate
Democrats lost among voters who said the economy was the most important issue: 55% voted for a Republican candidate; 42% for a Democratic candidate. 5

6. Social Security was a particularly important voting issue for independents who voted for a Democrat in this election, voters aged 65 to 74, and older voters who are women, independent, moderate, white and African American.
Most likely to say Social Security and Retirement Security the Most Important Issue in Deciding for Whom to Vote in 2010:
Voters (17%)
Voters 70-74* (16%)
Women 55+ (15%)
Independent women (14%)
Moderates age 55+ (21%)
Whites 55+ (14%)
African Americans 55+* (17%)
Independents who voted for a Democratic candidate (13%) 6
*Note small sample size

7. Who Will Better Handle Social Security
In terms of which political leaders will better handle Social Security, Congressional Republicans have a seven-point lead over President Obama, but Congressional Republicans and Congressional Democrats run about even among voters overall.
Who Will Better Handle Social Security
Total
Dems
Inds
Reps
Tea Party
Republicans in Congress
31% 3%
26%
59%
57%
Democrats in Congress
28%
64%
23% 1% 2%
Both the same
34%
29%
41%
Neither 4% 5%
33%
25%
65%
61%
President Obama
18% 6%
27%
40%
11%
+3R
+3R
+7R
+7R 7
Split sampled questions

8. Who Will Better Handle Social Security
Over the last six months, Congressional Republicans have gained credibility over President Obama on Social Security among voters overall, while the margin between Congressional Democrats and Republicans remains about the same. Independent voters are now more likely to think both parties in Congress will handle the issue similarly. When considering Obama versus Congressional Republicans, however, the number of independents who look to Republicans has risen 16 points.
Who Will Better Handle Social Security
Total
Dems
Inds
Reps
Tea Party
Nov.
Change from May
Republicans in Congress
31% +1 3% -4
26% +8
59% -2
57%
Democrats in Congress
28% +2
64%
23% 1% -1 2% -3
Both the same
34%
+14
29%
+12
41%
+18
+13
+19
Neither 4%
-14 -8
-27
-10 5%
33% +6
25%
+16
65% +4
61% +5
President Obama
18% 6%
27%
40%
+15 -9
11%
-22 -6 8
Split sampled questions

9. Reactions to Cutting Social Security Benefits
There is strong, widespread opposition to cutting Social Security benefits in order to reduce the federal deficit. This carries across Democratic, Republican and independent voters, as well as Tea Party supporters. Opposition to cutting benefits in order to make the program solvent is less intense, but majorities of voters across parties still oppose benefit cuts under this rationale. Robust majorities oppose cutting retirement benefits for people earning more than $60,000.

10. Majorities of voters across party lines are strongly opposed to cutting benefits in order to reduce the federal deficit.
A majority of voters across demographic and political subgroups oppose cutting Social Security benefits. Opposition is particularly strong among: women (74% strongly oppose), voters age 55 and older (80%), voters with a high school education or less (79%), independent women (77%)*, unmarried women (82%), and Northeasterners (77%) *Note small n size.
Split sampled question

11. Intense opposition to cutting Social Security Benefits is stronger among senior citizens and voters aged 50-64, but, still nearly two-thirds of voters under age 50 are strongly opposed to benefit cuts.
Split sampled question

12. Cutting Social Security Benefits in Order to Reduce the Deficit
In the past six months, independents and Republicans both have increased slightly in their strong opposition to cutting benefits. Independents are up six points in strong opposition, as are Republicans.
Cutting Social Security Benefits in Order to Reduce the Deficit
Total
Dems
Inds
Reps
Tea Party
Nov ‘10
May ‘10
% oppose
(% strongly oppose)
82% (72%)
81%
(71%)
83%
(73%)
89%
(79%)
78%
(72%)
76%
(66%)
82%
77%
74%
(61%)
(64%)
Change in opposition
(Change in strong opposition) +1
(+1) -6
(-6) +2
(+6) +5 -2
(-3) 12

13. Majorities of Democrats, independents, and Republicans oppose cutting benefits to make the program solvent. Just over half of Tea Party supporters also oppose cuts under this rationale. Intense opposition is lower, however, among Republicans and Tea Party supporters.
Split sampled question 13

14. Voters under age 50 are more willing to cut benefits in the name of long-term solvency, but still six in ten oppose cuts.
Split sampled question 14

15. Across political affiliations, six in ten voters oppose reducing benefits, upon their retirement, for people earning over $60,000 today. Intense opposition is highest among Republicans, independents, and Tea Partiers.
A majority of voters across all demographic and political subgroups oppose reducing benefits for people earning above $60,000. 15

16. Raising the Retirement Age
There is broad opposition to raising the retirement age, with intense opposition much higher across party lines when the proposal is specifically described as raising the retirement age to 69, rather than giving no specific age. Early retirement is received somewhat differently, with a slim majority in support of raising the early retirement age from 62 to 65.

17. Sixty-two percent of voters oppose raising the retirement age and nearly half strongly oppose this. Opposition to raising the retirement age is more intense when the proposal is described as “raising the retirement age to 69.” With this added description, nearly seven in ten voters oppose raising the retirement age, and nearly six in ten strongly oppose.
Split sampled questions 17

18. NEXT 3 slides will only use the Raise the retirement age to 69 data not the generic raise the retirement age. The Fiscal Commissioner Co-Chairs’ proposals is to raise the age to 69.
Split sampled questions 18

19. Raising the Retirement Age to make Social Security More Solvent
Opposition to raising the retirement age is at six in ten across party lines, with independent voters showing the most intense opposition to raising the retirement age. When “age 69” is included, intense opposition is stronger across party lines. Strong opposition jumps most dramatically among Democrats and Tea Partiers with the specific age reference.
Raising the Retirement Age to make Social Security More Solvent
% opposed (% strongly opposed)
Total
Dems
Inds
Reps
Tea Party
Raise the retirement age
62%
(48%)
63%
(55%)
59%
(41%)
57%
(39%)
Raise the retirement age to age 69
69%
(58%)
76%
(62%)
77%
(63%)
(50%)
(56%)
General description minus
Specific description
+7 opp.
(+10 strg opp.)
+13 (+14)
+14 (+8)
-2 (+9)
+5 (+17)
Split sampled questions 19

20. Raising the Retirement Age to make Social Security More Solvent
Majorities of voters across age groups oppose raising the retirement age generally, as well as with a specific age reference. Opposition is stronger among voters under age 65.
Raising the Retirement Age to make Social Security More Solvent
% opposed (% strongly opposed)
Total
<50
50-64
65+
Raise the retirement age
62%
(48%)
70%
(52%)
60%
(49%)
54%
(40%)
Raise the retirement age to age 69
69%
(58%)
75%
(61%)
58%
General description minus
Specific description
+7 opp.
(+10 strong opp)
+5 (+9)
+10 (+12)
+4 (+8)
Split sampled questions 20

21. Raising the Retirement Age to make Social Security More Solvent
Opposition to raising the retirement age is especially robust among blue collar voters. When the specific age of 69 is referenced, intense opposition jumps dramatically among college-educated men and both blue collar and college-educated women.
Raising the Retirement Age to make Social Security More Solvent
% opposed (% strongly opposed)
Total
Non-college men
Non-college women
College men
College women
Raise the retirement age
62%
(48%)
70% (56%)
67% (55%)
45% (36%)
(42%)
Raise the retirement age to age 69
69%
(58%)
71% (58%)
76% (68%)
66% (49%)
61% (53%)
General description minus
Specific description
+7 opp.
(+10 strong opp)
+1 (+2)
+9 (+13)
+21 (+13)
-1 (+11)
Split sampled questions 21

22. Enacting Social Security Taxes on Wages above $106,800
Around two-thirds of voters favor, and nearly half strongly favor, a proposal to gradually require employees and employers to pay Social Security taxes on all wages above $106,800. Intense support is slightly higher for requiring both employees and employers to pay taxes on all wages above $106,800, rather than just employers. There are surprisingly few partisan divisions.

23. Two-thirds of voters favor, and nearly half strongly favor, a proposal to gradually require employees and employers to pay Social Security taxes on all wages above $106,800, which they do not do now. Slightly fewer voters support the same proposal that would only apply to employers.
Split sampled questions 23

24. Both versions of the proposal earn a majority in support across political affiliations. Yet, support is weaker among independents, Republicans and Tea Party supporters, especially when taxes are just required of employers.
Gradually Requiring Social Security Taxes be Paid on All Wages above $106,800 in order to make Social Security More Solvent
% favor
(% strongly favor)
Total
Dems
Inds
Reps
Tea Party
Requiring employers
63%
(44%)
76%
(55%)
58%
(46%)
56%
(36%)
51%
(29%)
Requiring employers and employees
66%
(49%)
73%
(59%)
(47%)
59%
(43%)
60%
(42%)
Employers & Employees
margin over
Employers alone
+3 favor
(+5 strg favor)
-3 (+4)
+8 (+1)
+3 (+7)
+9 (+13)
Split sampled questions 24

25. Voters under age 50 are slightly more likely than their older counterparts to favor lifting the wage cap for employers and employees alike, but strong majorities across age groups favor the proposals.
Gradually Requiring Social Security Taxes be Paid on All Wages above $106,800 in order to make Social Security More Solvent
% favor
(% strongly favor)
Total
<50
50-64
65+
Requiring employers
63%
(44%)
67%
(47%)
58%
(40%)
Requiring employers and employees
66%
(49%)
65%
70%
(52%)
60%
(46%)
Employers & Employees
margin over
Employers alone
+3 favor
(+5 strg favor)
-2 (+5)
+7 (+5)
+2 (+6)
Split sampled questions 25

26. Using Taxes to Protect or Guarantee Social Security Benefits
Partisan divisions emerge when voters consider raising taxes to help pay for Social Security, or ending the Bush tax cuts for the richest, top two percent of Americans in order to generate more revenue for Social Security.

27. Voters divide along party lines on a proposal to prevent the extension of the tax cuts for the top two percent of Americans and dedicating those additional taxes to guarantee Social Security benefits for the next 75 years. Among voters overall, half favor this proposal, while one-third opposes. Seven in ten Democrats and just over half of independents support this, while half or more Republicans and Tea Party supporters oppose the proposal.
Unsure/ DK
Margin
+18
19%
+57
17%
+27
22%
-19
19%
-28
16%