Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Open Access: The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Open Access: The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly"— Presentation transcript:

1 Open Access: The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly
By Tim Bottorff, Head, Rosen Library With assistance from Sarah Norris, Scholarly Communication Librarian, John C. Hitt Library 18 November 2016

2 What is Open Access? "Open-access (OA) literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.“ ~ Peter Suber "OA is a kind of access, not a kind of business model, license, or content." ~ Peter Suber

3 Common OA Pathways Publish in a fully OA journal, such as:
Tourism & Management Studies Review of Economic Analysis International Review of Management and Marketing Publish in a traditional journal that allows you to unlock an OA option (through negotiation or fees) Publish in a traditional journal & later archive your work in an OA repository, such as: STARS ResearchGate Academia.edu

4 The Good Increases access Increases impact
Shares your work worldwide, without paywalls or other hindrances Increases impact Increases your likelihood to be read and cited Increases your reputation Good for the institution & academia OA may help solve the “pricing crisis” for scholarly journals

5 The Bad OA publishing still costs money
Article Processing Charges (APCs) Some fields are slower to adopt OA OA journals may have lower metrics than traditional journals Some restrictions if you self-archive later: May have to use a pre- or post-print version of your work May have to wait until an embargo period passes Sherpa Romeo site can help you navigate the policies of most journals

6 The Ugly OA also provides an opportunity for… predatory publishers, lower quality journals, and various nefarious practices Tactics may include: May provide little or no evidence of real peer review May list researchers on editorial boards without their consent May spam researchers with unsolicited s May surprise researchers with high fees to publish the work May never actually publish the article

7 Recommendations Trust your gut
Use a checklist, such as Think Check Submit Check standard sources, such as: Directory of Open Access Journals Beall's Scholarly Open Access UCF Library’s Online Journals lookup site Google Scholar’s journal metrics A book in the library titled The Source: A Guide to Academic Journals in Hospitality, Leisure, Tourism, & Travel

8 Removing Articles from Predatory Journals
If your work was published in a predatory journal, you may wish to: Remove the article from your CV File a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice, see e.g.: takedown-notice-demystified/ File a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC):

9 UCF Librarians Questions about Open Access, predatory publishers, and other aspects of scholarly communication: Sarah Norris, Scholarly Communication Librarian Shane Roopnarine, Rosen Public Services Librarian Tim Bottorff, Rosen Head Librarian Questions about STARS (UCF’s digital institutional repository): Kerri Bottorff, Digital Collections Project Coordinator Lee Dotson, Digital Initiatives Librarian

10 Additional Sources UCF Libraries Open Access Guide UCF Libraries Scholarly Communication department communication/ Open Access Overview by Peter Suber


Download ppt "Open Access: The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google