Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Making World History Relevant to Engineers

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Making World History Relevant to Engineers"— Presentation transcript:

1 Making World History Relevant to Engineers
Keywords: General education, global competency, ABET Outcome h Making World History Relevant to Engineers Amber Genau, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham Materials Science and Engineering Dept.

2 Why? Objectives: Improve global competency in engineering graduates and address ABET Outcome h: Global competency: recognizing interconnectedness of society, politics, history, economics, the environment, and related topics ABET Outcome h: the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal But where? Engineering curriculum already jam packed and number of credits limited. Can’t sacrifice technical content. Solution: Re-envision required GenEd history classes! More than ¼ of credit hours for EGR degree (36/128) are GenEd, most entirely unrelated to students’ chosen area of study

3 Where? Setting: large, public research institution with state-mandated undergraduate Core Curriculum Current ways to meet history requirement severely limited U.S. History; World History; Western Civilizations Generic content similar to HS courses Often taken at community colleges or online to meet requirement with as little effort as possible Missed opportunity: students are not engaged

4 What? Proposed two-course sequence: world history through the lens of technological development HY 104E: From Homo Erectus to the Scientific Revolution HY 105E: The Industrial Revolution and the Creation of Technological Systems Team-taught by history and engineering faculty Focus on key concepts rather than broad chronological approach Examples: Materials, Water, Construction, Transportation, Power Some content borrowed from MSE 490: Evolution of Engineering Materials (my study abroad course)

5 When? Step 1: Institutional approval of Core Curriculum change
Students won’t take class unless it meets a requirement Step 2: Develop curriculum and materials Step 3: (Fall 2016?) Initial offering for high-ability first year pre-Engineering majors Build community and group identity Encourage students to think like engineers from very beginning of studies Meaningful case studies related to later classes Opportunity to wrestle with complex issues of professional responsibility and ethics Anticipated side benefit: improved retention! Step 4: Expand to multiple sections to meet demand

6 Prognosis? Hope to provide model for other team-taught classes between College of Arts and Sciences and professional schools Examples… Math Tools for Egr Problem Solving (math and engineering): Already exists! History of the Healing Arts (history and nursing) Machines in Literature (English and engineering) Technical writing (to replace English Composition) Current challenge: Institutional change is hard No mechanism to change Core curriculum for many years History chair and dean concerned about loss of CHP Help me! What kind of history of technology classes are offered on your campus? Textbook suggestions, syllabi, content modules, online resources, contact info all appreciated


Download ppt "Making World History Relevant to Engineers"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google